Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

997 Depreciation compared to 996?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2007, 10:20 AM
  #1  
eunsulover
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
eunsulover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 997 Depreciation compared to 996?

Porsche has been known to hold values quite well (look at 911/964/993). The abundance of 996 in the market, however, has caused the used car market of 996 to be unfavorable. It is truly amazing to see many 996 C2s in mid-$20K range.

What do you think about the used 997 market??
Old 04-11-2007, 10:41 AM
  #2  
RonCT
Moderator
Rennlist Member
 
RonCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,993
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Well, as a 997S owner I don't think anything about the resale markets. I bought the car I want, plan to keep it for many years. Whether the paper value holds or drops is irrelevant to my enjoyment of the car.

I will say I got 9.3% off MSRP on an ordered 2007 car, which put it in the same general price range of a used 2006 at the time - so it was an easy decision.
Old 04-11-2007, 12:03 PM
  #3  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,703
Received 238 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Depreciation of Porsche automobiles or appreciation of Porsche automobiles. Which concerns you the most? I think they're mutually exclusive. Many people think more about the economics of buying a Porsche than the pure experience of owning one. Which are you? The accountant? Or the enthusiast? For every year taht Porsches have been made they were always more expensive than a reasonable car. Always. What can we do about it? Porsche AG is on a campaign today of making as many as there is a demand for, unlike Ferrari which builds 5 less than the demand. Porsche is making the 997 with two shifts working a day. There is considerable demand for these cars,--globally. As a result, there will be many of these cars around in the future. Much as many don't want to be reminded, the 996 and the Cayenne have been two of the most successful Porsches ever made.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:14 PM
  #4  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,299
Received 298 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Desireable 911s have historically skipped generations, the 996 being a low point between the 993 and 997. I foresee the 997 holding its value much better than the 996, regardless of sales volume.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:20 PM
  #5  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,815
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Desireable 911s have historically skipped generations, the 996 being a low point between the 993 and 997. I foresee the 997 holding its value much better than the 996, regardless of sales volume.
Where do you get this crap? Its a mass produced car... the 997 is going to depreciate just like the 996.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:33 PM
  #6  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,299
Received 298 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

I didn't say it was going to appreciate...I said it would hold its value better than the 996. Where do I "get this crap", as you so rudely put it? I stated it as my opinion for the following reasons: (1) It's universally heralded as superior in terms of design, performance, and reliability, (2) even with the improvements, the price new did not increase, and (3) a look at the current used market shows that resale is indeed strong.

Edit: Just noticed in your profile that you're a 996 owner. No wonder the sour grapes.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:43 PM
  #7  
2ndof2
Three Wheelin'
 
2ndof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Westlake Village, CA
Posts: 1,915
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

There are very few cars that won't depreciate. 997, 996 are not among those few.

The fact that far less 928's were built compared with 996s or 997s did not save them from a disgraceful plummet in values. Demand was the issue.

The more 997s that roll off the line the greater the chance of value dropping because demand is being satisfied. Simple Econ 101.

I thought that buying a 993 that was 7 years old would have already experienced the bulk of its depreciation given what seemed like strong demand for a car no longer being built. Trouble is most 993 owners eventually wound up putting their cars on the market to probably buy a newer porsche. Guess what that lower demand has done and is doing to 993 prices? Same will happen to the 997s except there will be alot more of them hitting the market at the same time. Just hope for steady wage increases in the economy and greater world population that desires used 997's and maybe prices won't totally implode on you. I'm looking forward to the big drop so I can pick one up cheap in a couple of years when my 993 is getting a little long in the tooth.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:43 PM
  #8  
nkhalidi
Rennlist Member
 
nkhalidi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC / FL
Posts: 1,314
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcg412
the 997 is going to depreciate just like the 996.
I think RCG means the 997 will depreciate at the same rate as the 996, and that there's no objective evidence to the contrary. Correct me if I'm wrong, RCG.

Just because magazines commend the 997 as a strong evolutionary step from the 996 doesn't mean 997 owners all have instant classics in our garages. I think a lot of the reason the 993 holds values so well is the - warranted or unwarranted - romance and mystique surrounding its air-cooled motor.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:49 PM
  #9  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,815
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
I didn't say it was going to appreciate...I said it would hold its value better than the 996. Where do I "get this crap", as you so rudely put it? I stated it as my opinion for the following reasons: (1) It's universally heralded as superior in terms of design, performance, and reliability, (2) even with the improvements, the price new did not increase, and (3) a look at the current used market shows that resale is indeed strong.

Edit: Just noticed in your profile that you're a 996 owner. No wonder the sour grapes.
Haha - it doesnt matter if I had a 996, 993, 356 or whatever. Your comment was clearly made to make you feel better about your car, as evidenced that you have a more "desirable" model.

Why would I be sour about owning a 996? I love the car.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:50 PM
  #10  
Leader
Rennlist Member
 
Leader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,298
Received 532 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

I've always had the feeling that the 996's close resemblance to the 986 (front view) played a role in its less-than-stellar resale prices.

Perhaps the facelift of the 997 may help its value as the years go by.

Even with the 987's restyle, the Carrera and Boxster are not as close as were the 996 and 986.

(How come there's so much "contention" on this Forum lately?)
Old 04-11-2007, 04:51 PM
  #11  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,299
Received 298 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2ndof2
The more 997s that roll off the line the greater the chance of value dropping because demand is being satisfied. Simple Econ 101.
Not really...if used demand is stronger than the 996 for the reasons stated (and supply is assumed equal), values will be higher. That's how "simple econ 101" works.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:52 PM
  #12  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,815
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nkhalidi
I think RCG means the 997 will depreciate at the same rate as the 996, and that there's no objective evidence to the contrary. Correct me if I'm wrong, RCG.

Just because magazines commend the 997 as a strong evolutionary step from the 996 doesn't mean 997 owners all have instant classics in our garages. I think a lot of the reason the 993 holds values so well is the - warranted or unwarranted - romance and mystique surrounding its air-cooled motor.
You are correct - the 997 will depreciate at the same rate as the 996.
Old 04-11-2007, 05:07 PM
  #13  
OCBen
Banned
 
OCBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back in the OC
Posts: 15,022
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Not really...if used demand is stronger than the 996 for the reasons stated (and supply is assumed equal), values will be higher. That's how "simple econ 101" works.
And the reason why demand for the 997 will likely be higher than for the 996 is probably summed up here:

Originally Posted by Leader
I've always had the feeling that the 996's close resemblance to the 986 (front view) played a role in its less-than-stellar resale prices.

Perhaps the facelift of the 997 may help its value as the years go by.

Originally Posted by rcg412
You are correct - the 997 will depreciate at the same rate as the 996.
Are you just making a clarification of your previously stated opinion, as there is really no sound basis to support your position compared to the valid reasons stated by Smithee and Leader to support theirs?
Old 04-11-2007, 05:22 PM
  #14  
MrBonus
Three Wheelin'
 
MrBonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 1,796
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Perhaps I'm a bit jaded by my 997-colored glasses but I think demand for the 997 will be higher simply because it has brought back a portion of the audience it had previously alienated by the 996's departure from the classic 911 design.
Old 04-11-2007, 05:33 PM
  #15  
rcg412
Rennlist Member
 
rcg412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back-Country Greenwich, CT
Posts: 1,815
Received 122 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OCBen
And the reason why demand for the 997 will likely be higher than for the 996 is probably summed up here:

Are you just making a clarification of your previously stated opinion, as there is really no sound basis to support your position compared to the valid reasons stated by Smithee and Leader to support theirs?
no - i was clarifying per nkhalidis post. My point is quite clear, 996s and 997s are mass produced at levels never seen before in Porsches history - as a result, they should depreciate similairly. Leader has a valid point - but I would argue the differences would be negligible.


Quick Reply: 997 Depreciation compared to 996?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:36 PM.