Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

X51 impact on 0-60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2006, 04:33 PM
  #16  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

There is a range in which the engine output must fall to leave the factory. I have seen plus/minus 3% (about 10 hp, a lot) but maybe another can verify this. Also, some say they check every engine, some say not. At any rate the article is a comparison and is on their website under roadtests. I'd post a link for you but I suck at the internets.
Old 06-26-2006, 05:13 PM
  #17  
JFScheck
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JFScheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dynoed at 2,100 miles at 407 horses with it 87 degrees outside and 78% humidty...

997S with X-51 engine package - I was told that as the engine breaks in more it might even improve some (as would if it were a cooler day or less humid)...
Old 06-26-2006, 05:19 PM
  #18  
robbonds
Three Wheelin'
 
robbonds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Saint Petersburg
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

what was it to the wheels? only way you are getting 407 is if you pulled the engine and dynoed just the block
Old 06-26-2006, 05:46 PM
  #19  
Vancouver83LTD
Nordschleife Master
 
Vancouver83LTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

0-60 in 3.9seconds downhill, maybe
Old 06-27-2006, 03:14 AM
  #20  
jj99c2
Rennlist Member
 
jj99c2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 264
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I believe the 3.9 was for the C2S and they called out having to abuse the car with massive wheel hop to get the great 0-60 time. That is outrageously fast for 355 HP.

The C4S article was the one they mentioned not having any wheel hop -- but the 0-60 times were not as good.
Old 06-27-2006, 06:05 AM
  #21  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

R&T, 3/05 said of Carrera S Coupe "The rear...tires hook up immediately at launch (none of that axle tramp that beseiged past 911's)" Read comparo at www.roadand track.com. It is there for all to see! Others tests have cited wheel hop which is why I have suggested that launch conditions were favorable here for whatever reason.
Old 06-27-2006, 10:46 AM
  #22  
MJones
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
MJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gpjli2
There is a range in which the engine output must fall to leave the factory. I have seen plus/minus 3% (about 10 hp, a lot) but maybe another can verify this. Also, some say they check every engine, some say not. At any rate the article is a comparison and is on their website under roadtests. I'd post a link for you but I suck at the internets.
On my factory vist:
Each engine is assembled for the that particular ordered car, across the model range, Boxster, Cayman, 997, Cayenne, and when they were in production CGT.

The last stage of the engine assemnly line is a visit to the dyno for every engine assembled. This is to assure that each engine meets its minimum advertised HP ratings.
Also interesting is smewhere at PAG is a dossier for each car assembled that contains the dyno results, as well as all other assembly details.

Old 06-27-2006, 11:51 AM
  #23  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Thank you, M, for the clarification. Now, if we can get James to lift those dossiers for us......
Old 06-27-2006, 11:54 AM
  #24  
meaker
Three Wheelin'
 
meaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 1,749
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

http://www.weissach.net/996-997_RoadTestSummary.html This is where I came up with a avg. of 4.3
Old 06-27-2006, 04:53 PM
  #25  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Interesting stuff Meaker. Haven't seen it before. Now the car I wished I had bought is the standard Carrera that Car and Driver tested in 04. Look at the money I could have saved The only thing I have read on the x51 was the Excellence article earlier this year where they found: It (x51) pulled away from CS slowly but surely in 3rd and 4th gears. They felt sound was biggest selling feature.
Old 06-27-2006, 09:04 PM
  #26  
1AS
Rennlist Member
 
1AS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: dune acres, Indiana
Posts: 4,084
Received 52 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I don't think the published figures mean anything at all. In your own car, you will probably turn 5.0-5.2, even if your car was that car. None of us will brutalize the driveline just to get a few more tenths off a theoretical clock. 5-100 is more meaningful. AS
Old 06-28-2006, 01:24 AM
  #27  
gpjli2
Three Wheelin'
 
gpjli2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

While not an absolute, the 0-60 or 0-100 times are a basis of comparison between automobiles. If under controlled circumstances car X does a 4.8 and car Y does a 4.5 we can probably say the second car is faster. What I do on the street in that car is a different issue. I have yet (2600miles) to drop the clutch with revs up. Without practice you cannot be fast. Btw, can I borrow your car for a few days while mine is in the shop?
Old 06-28-2006, 10:11 PM
  #28  
JFScheck
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JFScheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Meaker - Great Link!



Quick Reply: X51 impact on 0-60?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:16 AM.