Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Advice 2006 4S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2020, 06:45 AM
  #1  
ermed911
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
ermed911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Advice 2006 4S

Looking to purchase a 2006 Tagra 4S.
How much concern for IMS issue in this model.
Any other issues regarding this model.
TIA
Old 03-13-2020, 07:08 AM
  #2  
cwheeler
Rennlist Member
 
cwheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,633
Received 382 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

Couple things to check out. IMS and bore scoring. Read through the buyers guide. It's there for a reason. But def get and invasive PPI.

cw
Old 03-13-2020, 08:26 AM
  #3  
mjposner
Rennlist Member
 
mjposner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: South West Florida
Posts: 784
Received 206 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

S models have the 3.8 liter engine that does not suffer ims issues except for the very earliest models:“S” Engine (3.8) has designation “M97”, can have the smaller IMS or revised larger IMS bearing:

Engine (3.8) number up to M97/01 68509790 has the older IMS bearing and Engine number from M97/01 68509791 has the larger revised IMS.
Bore scoring can be an issue. If its a cold weather car or one exhaust pipe side is much dirtier it is more likely.
The following users liked this post:
ermed911 (03-13-2020)
Old 03-13-2020, 08:44 AM
  #4  
ermed911
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
ermed911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks mate.
Larger revised IMS = less prone to failure?
Old 03-13-2020, 10:07 AM
  #5  
TopKatz
Racer
 
TopKatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 349
Received 144 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ermed911
Thanks mate.
Larger revised IMS = less prone to failure?
yes
Old 03-13-2020, 11:16 AM
  #6  
cosm3os
Burning Brakes
 
cosm3os's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 982
Received 96 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

None.
Old 03-14-2020, 02:39 AM
  #7  
sandwedge
Nordschleife Master
 
sandwedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,493
Received 1,041 Likes on 736 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ermed911
Thanks mate.
Larger revised IMS = less prone to failure?
Much less prone to failure than the original smaller bearing BUT not fail proof as some here still keep saying. There are documented IMS failures of all 997 models 2005-2008. The larger bearing introduced mid or late 2005 greatly reduced the failure rate but not by 100%. Close to it though. Didn't reach the 100% fail proof distinction until 2009 when the new DFI engine was introduced which didn't have an IMS bearing to begin with.

Old 03-14-2020, 08:39 AM
  #8  
mjposner
Rennlist Member
 
mjposner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: South West Florida
Posts: 784
Received 206 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Or on the gen 1 turbo..
Old 03-14-2020, 08:42 AM
  #9  
mjposner
Rennlist Member
 
mjposner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: South West Florida
Posts: 784
Received 206 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

On a S model I would be most concerned about over revs. If you plan on a ppi make sure they check for this. If you aren't (or can't) get one of these and do it yourself:
Foxwell 530 NT Foxwell 530 NT
Old 03-14-2020, 06:52 PM
  #10  
niacin
Track Day
 
niacin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: 94110
Posts: 16
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For a 4S, it'd also be good to make sure the PPI checks out the inner and outer CV boots on the front axles. It's a bit of a job to replace them.



Quick Reply: Advice 2006 4S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:27 AM.