Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

996 turbo investment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2016 | 06:21 PM
  #76  
Sveach756's Avatar
Sveach756
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 503
Likes: 51
From: Schertz, TX
Default

I'd agree, I love my interior. Maybe I'll add a little silver trim and color match the back of the seats when I paint but that's it. I updated the steering wheel which is the only part that shows the age of the car. Ps my interior has 99,000 miles
Shawn
Attached Images   
Old 06-07-2016 | 06:22 PM
  #77  
"02996ttx50's Avatar
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by José Ferreira

They all look like Beetles, except ours.
abSOlutely!

i think they were goin for something like this? 907 917 one of em lol how about THESE lamps!
Attached Images  
Old 06-09-2016 | 02:23 AM
  #78  
996SPECticle's Avatar
996SPECticle
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 523
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Barking Mad
Me too, as it left the factory



in the future it will be that S and the sport seats that sell your car and the interior only matters if it begins deteriorating. Those seats seem uber rare in many of 996 cars on the market, what are those called? Was '05 an intro year for those. I wonder if the NAV will really matter 2 cents in 20 years.
You have a trifecta plus. MT coupe, a last of and a best of model. If it were an odd color you'd have to bar the door someday. One that should exceed the market for sure.
Old 06-09-2016 | 06:31 PM
  #79  
su_maverick's Avatar
su_maverick
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Hardbacked sport seats with color match were available back in 2001 models. That was the deciding factor when I purchased mine.
Old 06-11-2016 | 12:37 PM
  #80  
rsh's Avatar
rsh
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

As a wannabe x50 owner (any available, please let me know), I'm LOVING this thread. Thanks for the education and entertainment, fellas.
Old 06-13-2016 | 05:30 PM
  #81  
tdrimer's Avatar
tdrimer
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rsh
As a wannabe x50 owner (any available, please let me know), I'm LOVING this thread. Thanks for the education and entertainment, fellas.
i am an x50
Owner...with pccb, with now 14,600 miles and would be hard pressed to sell! But man is this car something else!
Old 06-13-2016 | 10:42 PM
  #82  
911mhawk's Avatar
911mhawk
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 190
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by rsh
As a wannabe x50 owner (any available, please let me know), I'm LOVING this thread. Thanks for the education and entertainment, fellas.
I'll sell you my 15k mile K24's and intercoolers, then you'll have the X50 part resolved and can focus on finding the best overall car?
Old 06-14-2016 | 09:24 AM
  #83  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,716
Likes: 1,451
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

my goodness, the delusion is strong in this thread.
Old 06-14-2016 | 12:23 PM
  #84  
Macster's Avatar
Macster
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,034
Likes: 255
From: Centerton, AR
Default

Better enjoy the Turbo as an "investment" while you can.

Just picked up an issue of 911 & Porsche World magazine (a UK published indy Porsche car mag) and there's an article "Market Watch" (on page 138) that begins with: "The latest Porsches, with their myriad of digital systems may be brilliant on fuel and emissions, but many buyers prefer the simpler, previous generation models, it seem".

The article goes on to tout how boring the more recent Porsche models are and how they have lost their "soul" and there is an "upswing in affection for the ``analogue`` Porsches."

Seems the 2nd generation 911s first introduced in 2008 are "lauded" for their new engines which "banished the cylinder bore wear issues that dogged previous water cooled 911s and Boxsters, but they are now being increasingly viewed as the last of the ``simple`` Porsche 911s and that, it is widely reckoned, will not only ensure they hold their value strongly but will soon make appreciating assets if well preserved by their owners."

And so it begins.

I can recall and used to have the old issues with the articles around that then touted the 996's and the 996 Turbo as the next hot thing in used Porsches.
Old 06-14-2016 | 01:44 PM
  #85  
Rustler's Avatar
Rustler
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 246
Likes: 146
From: Bozeman, MT
Default

Originally Posted by rsabeebe
as with many others, i wouldn't view a 996tt as an investment as much as i would an undervalued model that can't go anywhere but up. we're not talking 993tt action, just a nice place to put some money into a car and not worry about depreciation. enjoy it, drive it and don't hassle the money.
I think this sums it up pretty well. Great performance value now, and outside of putting huge miles on I think it's fair to say 996tts will at least hover around their present value.

After getting shredded by depreciation on a new BMW, and having no desire to fret over putting miles on a garage queen, I really like the model of buying good middling mileage cars at the bottom of their depreciation curve and enjoying them. Sell for anything near what you put into it, and you got a GREAT value compared to a new car.
Old 06-14-2016 | 01:49 PM
  #86  
Th Dude's Avatar
Th Dude
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 5
From: Ojai, CA.
Default

At $47K, this is the highest asking price I've seen for a 100k mile example....
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ack-black.html

Delusional seller or sign of the times?

Being produced from 2001-2005, with an original sticker price between $120K-$150K, these cars were one of the many victims of the Great Recession. As a result, they suffered a depreciation rate that was disproportional to historical values.

Universally praised upon their initial release by every automotive journalist, (including Porsche hater Jeremy Clarkson) it should come as no surprise that these cars are being re-discovered for the performance gems that they are.

The undeniable creeping up of asking prices, as evidenced above, is merely reflective of the increasing demand. In my opinion, it is a sign of the times.
Old 06-14-2016 | 02:32 PM
  #87  
911mhawk's Avatar
911mhawk
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 190
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Th Dude
At $47K, this is the highest asking price I've seen for a 100k mile example....
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ack-black.html

Delusional seller or sign of the times?

Being produced from 2001-2005, with an original sticker price between $120K-$150K, these cars were one of the many victims of the Great Recession. As a result, they suffered a depreciation rate that was disproportional to historical values.

Universally praised upon their initial release by every automotive journalist, (including Porsche hater Jeremy Clarkson) it should come as no surprise that these cars are being re-discovered for the performance gems that they are.

The undeniable creeping up of asking prices, as evidenced above, is merely reflective of the increasing demand. In my opinion, it is a sign of the times.
+1
Another factor is the $100-200k 991. For a $50k savings you can overlook a lot of headlights from the drivers seat.
Old 06-14-2016 | 06:42 PM
  #88  
rsabeebe's Avatar
rsabeebe
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 1,016
From: Plano/DFW
Default

personally, i think the black, 100k mile tt is overpriced. certainly a nice car, but $47k should get you a similar example in the 50k mile range, if not below. i'm just not seeing that price at that mileage - too many other tts out there.
Old 06-14-2016 | 07:05 PM
  #89  
Th Dude's Avatar
Th Dude
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 5
From: Ojai, CA.
Default

Be careful shopping based on price and mileage alone.

Last edited by Th Dude; 06-14-2016 at 07:35 PM.
Old 06-14-2016 | 07:50 PM
  #90  
Bloose993TT's Avatar
Bloose993TT
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 131
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by Th Dude
At $47K, this is the highest asking price I've seen for a 100k mile example....
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ack-black.html

Delusional seller or sign of the times?

Being produced from 2001-2005, with an original sticker price between $120K-$150K, these cars were one of the many victims of the Great Recession. As a result, they suffered a depreciation rate that was disproportional to historical values.

Universally praised upon their initial release by every automotive journalist, (including Porsche hater Jeremy Clarkson) it should come as no surprise that these cars are being re-discovered for the performance gems that they are.

The undeniable creeping up of asking prices, as evidenced above, is merely reflective of the increasing demand. In my opinion, it is a sign of the times.
Fair asking price since the car isn't modded/original. If everything checks out he should get around $40k since its a X50.


Quick Reply: 996 turbo investment?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:44 PM.