Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How to my X50 less laggy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2018, 10:30 PM
  #16  
bugeyemilo
Racer
 
bugeyemilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 442
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Get a tune and an exhaust, and keep the revs up.
Old 12-21-2018, 10:49 PM
  #17  
jdexter
Instructor
 
jdexter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 160
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Don't forget the intake side. The new fender intakes with mafless tunes seem to be what everyone is doing now. I have flexible intakes and removed all the heavy restrictive bends in the oem intake. Big difference in spool!
Old 12-22-2018, 01:27 AM
  #18  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,582
Received 2,722 Likes on 1,463 Posts
Default

Checking for boost leaks should be #1 before ANY consideration of upgrades IMHO.. The turbos have enough headroom that they can overcome small and medium leaks and still provide "full boost" on the boost gauge, but spool time will definitely be affected, not to mention your making the Turbos work much harder than they should have to. When I pressure tested for leaks, I really didn't expect to find any leaks as my boost pressure was good and the car didn't seem excessively laggy (non X-50), but there were several that had likely been there since I purchased the car. Once fixed, it made a HUGE difference and the car spooled much faster.

That said, the X50's do have a fair bit more lag. And while you don't mention transmission, if X50 and Tiptronic, it can havequite an unpleasant amount of lag even with zero boost leaks.
Old 12-22-2018, 09:58 PM
  #19  
jayzbird
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jayzbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040
Received 252 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

It’s a manual. Best advice so far is to check for boost leaks before starting to throw $$, so today I finally started that process. Fabricated these, but have only done from the top side so far


The only obvious leak I could find was from this hose that connects to the diverter valve.


I tried re-seating the clamp to no avail. Other than the air bleeding from the oil filler cap, it would take it would take a couple minutes to bleed off 10-15psi. So it seems there are no gross leaks?
Old 12-22-2018, 10:21 PM
  #20  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,582
Received 2,722 Likes on 1,463 Posts
Default

Disclaimer: I'm no expert, my experience is from boost checking my own car and a couple of others, plus all the great advice I've read from some of the tuners who offer their advice on Rennlist...
---------
1. Where are you pressurizing from? My best results when pressure testing was to connect to the intercooler inlet pipes underneath the car. Pretty easy to get to with a jack/jackstand or ramps.. Anyplace else and I was chasing phantom leaks like the oil cap. The turbos themselves will bleed air into the crankcase if you pressurize anywhere upstream of the turbos themselves.

2. The F-pipe(where your arrow is pointing) is a pretty common place to have leaks. I've seen them split on the bottom where you can't see it unless removed. Running your hand along the bottom of the F-pipe and listen for changes in the leak sound.

3. Looks like you have some aftermarket diverter valves? I've seen several threads where they also have caused some boost leaks...

4. If you are really holding 15 psi pressure for 30-60 seconds, thats pretty good. Even small leaks will bleed off pressure pretty quickly.

5. These are the test plugs I built and used... Super simple and effective, but the correct size PVC plugs were not available at the typical lowes/homeDepot. A well equipped ACE hardware had them. These babies, some soapy water in a spray bottle, and careful listening found all my leaks pretty quickly. A couple of guys make much nicer ones out of metal that are less likely to "pop out" under pressure, but if your in a hurry and don't want to wait, these worked fine.



Old 12-22-2018, 10:54 PM
  #21  
jayzbird
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jayzbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040
Received 252 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Thanks for the advice! The air definitely is coming out of the junction of the hose and the dv, so I’m at a bit of a loss since re-seating it didn’t seem to help, I have no spare parts, and all this stuff is right up against the top of the engine compartment. Does motor need to be lowered to replace these? No leaks from the top of the dv which seems to be where they usually fail.

I don’t know if my bottom side plugs will work. Got the specs from another post. I did have one explosive event when the manifold side of the short ribbed air box connector hose blew out. Remember to tighten down the hose clamps on both ends!
Old 12-22-2018, 11:26 PM
  #22  
pfbz
Rennlist Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: US
Posts: 7,582
Received 2,722 Likes on 1,463 Posts
Default

The air definitely is coming out of the junction of the hose and the dv, so I’m at a bit of a loss since re-seating it didn’t seem to help,
Maybe there is a split in the hose right where the clamp is? You could also try using a worm-drive hose clamp instead of the spring clamp and see if it's just a matter of how tight it is, but my guess is that your f-pipe has a small split in it that you wont be able to spot until you pull it off completely. Or perhaps your aftermarket diverter has a small crack in it.

Personally, I'd just swap in new diverter valves (710N diverter valves, about $40 each) and a new F-pipe (I used a Forge silicon F pipe, about $68). These parts are known failure points and it sounds like there is a good chance one of them has a failure rather than just not seating properly...

I did have one explosive event when the manifold side of the short ribbed air box connector hose blew out. Remember to tighten down the hose clamps on both ends!
You are pressurizing pre-turbo, and you probably don't have the correct size plugs to pressurize from below, but IMHO it's well worth the effort to find some 2.5" pvc plugs shown above and test from the intercooler inlet. You will save a ton of time chasing down issues that are not relevant as otherwise you are pressurizing areas that do not see boost pressure.

...all this stuff is right up against the top of the engine compartment. Does motor need to be lowered to replace these?
.

If I recall, the f-pipe can usually be worked off without lowering the engine, but your aftermarket diverter valves might be making it more difficult. It's quite easy to lower the engine slightly once you know how... Put a jack under the engine to support it, loosen the lower engine mount bolts, but keep them threaded on the mounts at least a few turns, then gently lower the engine.

It's often easier to spend a few minutes slightly lowering the engine than dealing with the cursing and knuckle-scraping often required without lowering...
Old 12-23-2018, 01:19 AM
  #23  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

don't underestimate the possibility of having a leak at the #16 check valve at the plenum. pressurize on your test to about 20 psi and might even hear the leak.
Old 12-23-2018, 10:57 AM
  #24  
32krazy!
Drifting
 
32krazy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

if you testing at 15 psi thats not enough. leaks show up ay higher pressures that you dont see at lower ones. also test from the compressor side of the turbo so you can see if theres any leaks from the turbos themselves.

fwiw i test at 40 psi but my car runs max at 35 psi
Old 12-23-2018, 08:44 PM
  #25  
jayzbird
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jayzbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040
Received 252 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

There’s no risk to blowing seals at these higher pressures? Or is it ok on the turbo side but not on the intake?

The project is going on hiatus for Christmas, but wanted to thank all for the great advice.
Old 12-23-2018, 09:08 PM
  #26  
32krazy!
Drifting
 
32krazy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayzbird
There’s no risk to blowing seals at these higher pressures? Or is it ok on the turbo side but not on the intake?

The project is going on hiatus for Christmas, but wanted to thank all for the great advice.
Just watch it doesn't take your head off at the t/b if testing there!
Old 12-23-2018, 09:16 PM
  #27  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,308
Received 308 Likes on 214 Posts
Default

Over the years, the number one request for UMW is.. How can I lower the lag on my X50.. And yes tuning and a exhaust will help. But a similar rated tuned K16 fitted with the K24 X50 compressor wheel will out accelerate and develop more torque/power vs the "STOCK" K24 (earlier in the RPM curve) and match it to redline.
For the street the K16 and K16 hybrids are better suited vs the X50 K24's.. If you have the road and high speeds (well over 130 mph) the K24's begin to shine.
The new 991.1TS has "tiny" turbine wheels KO4 sizing.. 3/8" smaller diameter vs the K16 turbine wheel. And develop 580HP with a LARGER engine.
The 997.1TT has the very same 991 turbine wheel and shares are same basic engine and is 480HP out of the box with the TINY turbine. Massive engine torque is generated and limited by the ECU with this arrangement.
I am not ******* the K24's.. They have there place.. But for day to day street driving where you can't get over 100mph the K16 hybrids in my opinion make more sense.
FYI, the worst is a X50 Tippy configured as CAB (extra 300lbs)..

A little 996TT folklore. I designed a new K24 turbine wheel that didn't have the turbine wheel blade clipping. I see 300 RPM lag reduction (w/all stock exhaust/tuning) 600 to 700 RPM lag reduction tuned with exhaust. On one of my 996TT, I am running this combination in machined K24 cartridge in a machined/ported K16 turbine housing (nice lag reduction)...
The following users liked this post:
svpreme (02-01-2023)
Old 12-23-2018, 10:31 PM
  #28  
Dock
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Dock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 12,131
Received 766 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
A little 996TT folklore. I designed a new K24 turbine wheel that didn't have the turbine wheel blade clipping. I see 300 RPM lag reduction (w/all stock exhaust/tuning) 600 to 700 RPM lag reduction tuned with exhaust. On one of my 996TT, I am running this combination in machined K24 cartridge in a machined/ported K16 turbine housing (nice lag reduction)...
You're a Wizard.
Old 12-23-2018, 11:56 PM
  #29  
jayzbird
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
jayzbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,040
Received 252 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 32krazy!
Just watch it doesn't take your head off at the t/b if testing there!
Ha! Dang close— my head was was about a foot away when the hose blew out.
Old 12-24-2018, 12:13 AM
  #30  
"02996ttx50
Banned
 
"02996ttx50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,522
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

16/24 is the optimal turbo configuration for a street driven dual duty car.


Quick Reply: How to my X50 less laggy?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:42 PM.