996 RS Suspension Parts?
#16
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The inner attachment points are common across all the 996 with the exception of the RS that uses a different rear subframe. The outer attachment points are model dependent.
The outer front attachment for the control arm and the steering link on the 996 GT3 RS sits lower, to reduce bump steer. Bump steer is not that critical at the front, but it bothers.
At the rear, the 996 GT3 really needs a bump steer fix, and a solution to avoid unwanted toe changes. The rear toe eccentrics wear-out, the toe arms will move in and out causing a dangerous handling, and damage to the subframe.
Depending on the desired ride height, tuning is necessary using GT3 Cup toe links and spacers, or the expensive 996 GT3 RS rear subframe and uprights, and additional tuning with spacers.
There are three different rear uprights for the 996 series with the same attachment points: an early 996, a later 996 (including 996 C2, C4, Turbo, C4S, GT2, GT3), and the unique 996 GT3 RS uprights with lower outside attachment point for the control arm and toe link.
The outer front attachment for the control arm and the steering link on the 996 GT3 RS sits lower, to reduce bump steer. Bump steer is not that critical at the front, but it bothers.
At the rear, the 996 GT3 really needs a bump steer fix, and a solution to avoid unwanted toe changes. The rear toe eccentrics wear-out, the toe arms will move in and out causing a dangerous handling, and damage to the subframe.
Depending on the desired ride height, tuning is necessary using GT3 Cup toe links and spacers, or the expensive 996 GT3 RS rear subframe and uprights, and additional tuning with spacers.
There are three different rear uprights for the 996 series with the same attachment points: an early 996, a later 996 (including 996 C2, C4, Turbo, C4S, GT2, GT3), and the unique 996 GT3 RS uprights with lower outside attachment point for the control arm and toe link.
#17
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Cupcar
GT3 front wheel bearing is 10 mm larger diameter than 996
Originally Posted by Cupcar
The GT3 rear side sections have no rubber(solid) mounts and are raised 7 mm compared to 996
thx for the info. now i know what to upgrade
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
#18
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
According to my factory RS book, the only differerence between the RS side member and the normal GT3 side member is at the adjuster eccentric which is designed for more stroke and more negative camber adjustment. No mention is made of changing the height of the installation in the car.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SF bay area, CA
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Cupcar
According to my factory RS book, the only differerence between the RS side member and the normal GT3 side member is at the adjuster eccentric which is designed for more stroke and more negative camber adjustment. No mention is made of changing the height of the installation in the car.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
ok enough of my rambling.
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Cupcar
According to my factory RS book, the only differerence between the RS side member and the normal GT3 side member is at the adjuster eccentric which is designed for more stroke and more negative camber adjustment. No mention is made of changing the height of the installation in the car.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
Personally, I would think twice about adding the RS side members, they are expensive and a lot of work to replace just for more negative camber adjustment.
IMHO, the rear RS uprights and RS subframes are not worth it, other than the 8 lbs weight reduction. The rear geometry is fixed better with the Cup toe links (plus spacer rings), two pieces RS control arms, and a street height (anything over 105mm on stock tires).
At the front, the rear GT3 Cup links can be installed instead of the stock steering links. Adding spacers will remove the bump steer.
#22
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Another difference with the C2 uupright over the GT3 is that the C2 has a narrower bolt spacing for the brake caliper. You can not simply bolt on a 996TT or GT3 caliper.
#23
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here are just some of the suspension part numbers for a GT-3 RS. I bought two RS suspension kits from Gert @ Carnewal; I think there were over 60 separate parts. Price was no where near $11k.
996-343-041-97 (2) shock absorber
996-343-531-97-504 (1) coil spring set
996-343-070-93 (2) swaybar droplink
996-331-111-90 (1) rear wheel carrier (L)
996-331-112-90 (1) rear wheel carrier (R)
996-341-121-90 (1) control arm (L)
996-341-122-90 (1) control arm (R)
996-341-441-90 (2) bearing flange control arm
996-331-551-90 (1) support
996-331-051-92 (1) rear axle side section bracket (L)
996-331-052-92 (1) rear axle side section bracket (R)
See http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/s...655#post626655 for complete parts listing.
996-343-041-97 (2) shock absorber
996-343-531-97-504 (1) coil spring set
996-343-070-93 (2) swaybar droplink
996-331-111-90 (1) rear wheel carrier (L)
996-331-112-90 (1) rear wheel carrier (R)
996-341-121-90 (1) control arm (L)
996-341-122-90 (1) control arm (R)
996-341-441-90 (2) bearing flange control arm
996-331-551-90 (1) support
996-331-051-92 (1) rear axle side section bracket (L)
996-331-052-92 (1) rear axle side section bracket (R)
See http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/s...655#post626655 for complete parts listing.
#24
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just won the auction for the rear subframe, what a deal.
It should work nicely with my JRZ's and 6 bolt front RS wheel carriers.
It should work nicely with my JRZ's and 6 bolt front RS wheel carriers.
#25
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Correct, but the longer stroke goes on a 30 degrees angle. So, the less negative camber obtained by moving the control arm in, the better reduction in bump steer. After that re-adjust for more negative camber with shims on the two pieces RS control arm (and this increases track), then re-adjust toe, because adding rear camber shims increases toe out (opposite to the front that increases toe-in)
IMHO, the rear RS uprights and RS subframes are not worth it, other than the 8 lbs weight reduction. The rear geometry is fixed better with the Cup toe links (plus spacer rings), two pieces RS control arms, and a street height (anything over 105mm on stock tires).
At the front, the rear GT3 Cup links can be installed instead of the stock steering links. Adding spacers will remove the bump steer.
IMHO, the rear RS uprights and RS subframes are not worth it, other than the 8 lbs weight reduction. The rear geometry is fixed better with the Cup toe links (plus spacer rings), two pieces RS control arms, and a street height (anything over 105mm on stock tires).
At the front, the rear GT3 Cup links can be installed instead of the stock steering links. Adding spacers will remove the bump steer.
Also, if I understand you correctly, you feel the bumpsteer in a street height car does not benefit from the RS change in upright mounting points at either the front or the rear.
The conclusion would then be, unless you are going below street height significantly, the RS parts are a waste of time, since the bumpsteer can be solved with Cup parts. correct?
This would actually make a lot of sense, since I would think if the bumpsteer is a real problem with the Cup racing cars they would have the RS parts installed.
BTW, when you say an 8 pound weight reduction for the RS rear parts, is that 4 pounds each upright or are the side frames lighter as well?
Thanks for sharing your great experience with these RS parts.
![](http://forums.rennlist.com/upload/rs_medium.jpg)
#26
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Kevin
I just won the auction for the rear subframe, what a deal.
It should work nicely with my JRZ's and 6 bolt front RS wheel carriers.
It should work nicely with my JRZ's and 6 bolt front RS wheel carriers.
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Z06
What's special with this subframe compared to the original GT3 piece?
The 997 GT3 Cup (the two cars from Jon Groom) came with different rear subframes compared to the 996 GT3 Cup (he had two of those as well). The 997 Cup has the eccentric hole eliminated as well.
#28
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Cupcar
Below is a picture from the RS book I quoted. I drew in the red arrow. Do you mean the eccentric slot is at an angle as shown by my red arrow (or an arrow going the other direction), rather than just being parallel to the ground?
Also, if I understand you correctly, you feel the bumpsteer in a street height car does not benefit from the RS change in upright mounting points at either the front or the rear.
The conclusion would then be, unless you are going below street height significantly, the RS parts are a waste of time, since the bumpsteer can be solved with Cup parts. correct?
This would actually make a lot of sense, since I would think if the bumpsteer is a real problem with the Cup racing cars they would have the RS parts installed.
BTW, when you say an 8 pound weight reduction for the RS rear parts, is that 4 pounds each upright or are the side frames lighter as well?
Thanks for sharing your great experience with these RS parts.
![](http://forums.rennlist.com/upload/rs_medium.jpg)
Also, if I understand you correctly, you feel the bumpsteer in a street height car does not benefit from the RS change in upright mounting points at either the front or the rear.
The conclusion would then be, unless you are going below street height significantly, the RS parts are a waste of time, since the bumpsteer can be solved with Cup parts. correct?
This would actually make a lot of sense, since I would think if the bumpsteer is a real problem with the Cup racing cars they would have the RS parts installed.
BTW, when you say an 8 pound weight reduction for the RS rear parts, is that 4 pounds each upright or are the side frames lighter as well?
Thanks for sharing your great experience with these RS parts.
![](http://forums.rennlist.com/upload/rs_medium.jpg)
There is bump steer at both ends. The RS uprights fix the bump steer at the front axle, but not at the rear axle. There is a 4 lbs unsprung weight saving per rear upright, but no benefit on geometry. For a street GT3, the rear bump steer is easily dialed-out once you install the GT3 Cup toe links, and adjust the angle of the link with the spacers.
Once the rear bump steer is reduced, this car becomes much faster out of turns. Basically, while the stock car goes towards toe-out at the rear end when you hit the gas out of the turn (due to rear compression and toe link stock angle), the adjusted car stays planted and allows more gas and faster exit speeds as a consequence.
The RS uprights are a benefit because of the weight saving, but their geometry improvement can be achieved and optimized much better with alternate parts.
For the front axle, the GT3 Cup rear toe link can be adapted, and with the spacers, the bump steer can be reduced.
I don't have the weight specs for the RS subframes, but they don't look any lighter than the stock street GT3 hollow subframes.
#29
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So if you already own a stock GT3 RS, is there any benefit to changing any of the parts to cup parts for example?
Also what uprights etc does the 997 GT3 RS use?
Also what uprights etc does the 997 GT3 RS use?
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by DanH
So if you already own a stock GT3 RS, is there any benefit to changing any of the parts to cup parts for example?
Also what uprights etc does the 997 GT3 RS use?
Also what uprights etc does the 997 GT3 RS use?
GT-3 RSR > GT-3 (with RS uprights, monoballs, links) > GT-3 RS (race) > GT-3 R > GT-3 Cup > GT-3 street