Notices
996 GT2/GT3 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Update on 997GT3 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2005, 03:19 PM
  #76  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
My dyno run was done in a DynoJet Research @ TurboTrix Racing, but it's uncorrected. I will stop by the place, to get the corrected figures.
LOL , you win the stupidity award of the year , claiming uncorrected whp on the POS dynojet to be true hp, uninformed internet braging at it's best.

Newsflash :

dynojet = most inaccurate ( dyno operator " how much hp do you want ?")
mustang = ok but still optimistic
dynapack = same as mustang
MAHA = most accurate , that what the factory uses , put's some real stress on marginal tuned cars because of a 45 - 60 sec run, however the #'s are not good for bragging because there are real.

I recommend you stick to waxing your priced car.
Old 05-07-2005, 03:54 PM
  #77  
///Mous3
Burning Brakes
 
///Mous3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by pole position
LOL , ... [-cut-]
I also have wondered what NJ wrote...

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
For the non believers. If you have a GT3, bring it to a dyno.
Originally Posted by ///Mous3
Why would PAG allow such discrepancy between the stated HP at the crank and the RWHP? You are talking about 40 HP difference here not to mention the RWHP is higher than at the crank. That is ALOT and very "backwards"!

Are you sure the dyno was set up correctly?
Old 05-08-2005, 08:00 AM
  #78  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pole position
LOL , you win the stupidity award of the year , claiming uncorrected whp on the POS dynojet to be true hp, uninformed internet braging at it's best.

Newsflash :

dynojet = most inaccurate ( dyno operator " how much hp do you want ?")
mustang = ok but still optimistic
dynapack = same as mustang
MAHA = most accurate , that what the factory uses , put's some real stress on marginal tuned cars because of a 45 - 60 sec run, however the #'s are not good for bragging because there are real.

I recommend you stick to waxing your priced car.
I got the corrected numbers from that dyno run. On the same dyno the S2000 ran 198rwhp, 147lbs/ft (SAE corrected).

SAE: 366.09 rwhp, Torque 284.81 lbs/ft

So, if the dynapack is optimistic, then the 997S is running 300hp? probably the S2000 came with a Civic engine?

You can keep the award regardless.
Old 05-08-2005, 02:42 PM
  #79  
///Mous3
Burning Brakes
 
///Mous3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps this is an old news...
http://www.onlyporsche.net/News/Pors...y-Hans-Lehmann



Quick Reply: Update on 997GT3 engine



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:16 PM.