Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

She died doing what she loved. RIP 996 @ 166k miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2016 | 03:49 PM
  #46  
Rennlist Editor's Avatar
Rennlist Editor
Editor
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 2
Default Front page coverage

This deserves a front page tribute as well...
https://rennlist.com/articles/watchi...tic-swan-song/
Old 03-22-2016 | 05:39 PM
  #47  
Howaboutthat's Avatar
Howaboutthat
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 241
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by fpena944
I wonder if it would be easier and more inexpensive to just have Flat 6 build you a track-oriented 3.8 using an M96 block. Sure it won't have the race-proven components but I'm sure it would be a lot more reliable than a stock M96 and wouldn't need such extensive modification to make it work.
Not a racer, here, but did an LN-based re-sleeve and bore out from 3.4l to 3.8l (MY2000). Any residual interest in a turbo disappeared (the Fister exhaust helping a great deal). Seems that the Raby-based or similar professional effort (inclusive of better oil pressure management and top-end work) would provide all you would need for tracking - the cylinders, forged pistons, forged con rods (and ceramic IMS) are impressive stuff. The result (even absent the oil pressure upgrade for one not intending to track the car) is the essence of a 911 -- elemental, analogue, simple, lightweight and robust. Fast, too.
Old 03-22-2016 | 06:30 PM
  #48  
Bobster996's Avatar
Bobster996
Track Day
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Northampton, England
Default

My thoughts are to get it re built, but not by Jake Raby, not after those sarcastic comments. He sure knows how to alienate potential customers. Telling a customer they got a good one, when he makes his living out of re building the engines is beyond belief. What a plonker.
Old 03-22-2016 | 06:37 PM
  #49  
FRUNKenstein's Avatar
FRUNKenstein
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,015
Likes: 303
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Barn996
There was an article in Excellence magazine awhile back about a Boxster with a GT3 engine transplant in New Zealand I believe, and at the end of the article, it was concluded that he had more into the conversion than if he bought a GT3. And it took about 2 years to complete.
Apt description of a project car. Never again will I be foolish enough to own another.
Old 03-22-2016 | 08:14 PM
  #50  
jumper5836's Avatar
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,539
Likes: 72
From: great white north
Default

Originally Posted by Bobster996
My thoughts are to get it re built, but not by Jake Raby, not after those sarcastic comments. He sure knows how to alienate potential customers. Telling a customer they got a good one, when he makes his living out of re building the engines is beyond belief. What a plonker.
If the truth hurts then just bury your head in the sand. I have seen plenty of m96 and m97 engines end life prematurely. He did get a good one.
Old 03-22-2016 | 09:30 PM
  #51  
ejdoherty911's Avatar
ejdoherty911
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 14
From: Philadelphia
Default

166k miles, more track days than the owner could count, the majority of shifts over 4k rpm....you sir got everything this car had to offer... you should not feel one bit of loss, you got everything and more out of this car. So it cost a small fortune, greatness ALWAYS comes at a high cost. You drove this beast 166 THOUSAND MILES.
Old 03-23-2016 | 11:26 AM
  #52  
fpena944's Avatar
fpena944
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,379
Likes: 89
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Howaboutthat
Not a racer, here, but did an LN-based re-sleeve and bore out from 3.4l to 3.8l (MY2000). Any residual interest in a turbo disappeared (the Fister exhaust helping a great deal). Seems that the Raby-based or similar professional effort (inclusive of better oil pressure management and top-end work) would provide all you would need for tracking - the cylinders, forged pistons, forged con rods (and ceramic IMS) are impressive stuff. The result (even absent the oil pressure upgrade for one not intending to track the car) is the essence of a 911 -- elemental, analogue, simple, lightweight and robust. Fast, too.
So I take it you're satisfied with the end result?

I'm really interested because I too have about 167k miles on my car. So inevitably I'm going to need a rebuild or refresh in the near future. I've always been a proponent of upgrading when given the chance instead of just rebuilding.

How much of a bump in power did you realize with the upgrade? Still usable on the street I assume?
Old 03-23-2016 | 11:40 AM
  #53  
alpine003's Avatar
alpine003
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 29
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by fpena944
I'm really interested because I too have about 167k miles on my car. So inevitably I'm going to need a rebuild or refresh in the near future.
What makes you think that? I take it that you never saw the guy with 250k+?

We should all have the mindset of OP and try to drive our cars as much as possible til the death. I would really like to see other cars in the 200k+ mile club.
Old 03-23-2016 | 11:41 AM
  #54  
TJ993's Avatar
TJ993
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 31
From: Toronto, Ontario
Default

Thank goodness its not NA 13 Year Old Garbage - it would be in a Scrap Yard RUSTED downn to Zero

Rebuild it to what u think it should have been From the Beginning!!
F Porsche Approach
Build it the way you want it to be from this day forward ..call it a Tribute.
New day. New Oppurtunity!!
pm sent
TJ
Old 03-23-2016 | 12:44 PM
  #55  
fpena944's Avatar
fpena944
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,379
Likes: 89
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by alpine003
What makes you think that? I take it that you never saw the guy with 250k+?

We should all have the mindset of OP and try to drive our cars as much as possible til the death. I would really like to see other cars in the 200k+ mile club.
Oh trust me I still drive my car every day and I don't exactly baby it. But I'm cautiously optimistic. I'd love for my car to hit 200k+ without any issues but I'm also preparing for what could be a major refresh in the near future.

So far so good though!
Old 03-23-2016 | 01:01 PM
  #56  
AA717driver's Avatar
AA717driver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 39
From: Naples, FL/Sapphire, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Bobster996
My thoughts are to get it re built, but not by Jake Raby, not after those sarcastic comments. He sure knows how to alienate potential customers. Telling a customer they got a good one, when he makes his living out of re building the engines is beyond belief. What a plonker.
I didn't take it that way. It's like asking an Oncologist about how robust the human body is. He sees the hard cases.

TC
Old 03-23-2016 | 07:44 PM
  #57  
KC-CarGuy's Avatar
KC-CarGuy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 818
Likes: 128
From: Kansas
Default

166,000 miles and died doing what you enjoyed, ... well done my friend. Well done.
Old 03-23-2016 | 08:12 PM
  #58  
Howaboutthat's Avatar
Howaboutthat
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 241
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by fpena944
So I take it you're satisfied with the end result?

I'm really interested because I too have about 167k miles on my car. So inevitably I'm going to need a rebuild or refresh in the near future. I've always been a proponent of upgrading when given the chance instead of just rebuilding.

How much of a bump in power did you realize with the upgrade? Still usable on the street I assume?
Love it -- very noticeable increase in torque, though I have not dyno'd the car. It is extremely rev happy and linear clear up to the redline -- just a blast to drive. Not an inexpensive proposition, but for someone interested in a throwback, dyed-in-the wool, fast sports car, it suits the bill perfectly (certainly much cheaper than a GT4, if one were even available). I will leave the grand touring cars to others.
Old 03-23-2016 | 08:21 PM
  #59  
TT Surgeon's Avatar
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 17
From: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Default

Originally Posted by fpena944
I wonder if it would be easier and more inexpensive to just have Flat 6 build you a track-oriented 3.8 using an M96 block. Sure it won't have the race-proven components but I'm sure it would be a lot more reliable than a stock M96 and wouldn't need such extensive modification to make it work.
That's what I would do.....I seem to recall a guy who put a gt3 engine into a 996 c4s without too much trouble, I think he was on 6speed.
C
Old 03-25-2016 | 12:25 AM
  #60  
thxbuff2001's Avatar
thxbuff2001
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 62
From: Dallas
Default

Ill pitch in $100 bucks to bring her back. let me know if you have a paypal acct.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:32 PM.