New paperweight - IMSB
#16
Former Vendor
Wait, so do we know how many different origin of manufacturers exists for the IMS, and out of those which ones made the dual vs the single row?
It would be interesting to see if there is some correlation to IMS failures to a certain origin of manufacture.
Or it could be possible that the rubber seals themselves were made in various places but the bearings and related parts themselves were all made from the same manufacturer?
Lots of information concerning these bearings has been posted over the years, but 2-3X more has never been divulged publicly.
#17
Yes, "we" do. Its part of our development and gathering of trend data. I touch on this in my book. We closely guard this information.
Trend data continues to be gathered; however the units that fail completely and lead to catastrophic events are too destroyed to conclusively determine which source provided the bearing. We can only gather the data from the hundreds that have been caught during failure and by taking apart the thousands that have been returned to us and LN that were replaced electively. This is ongoing and always will be.
Absolutely.
Lots of information concerning these bearings has been posted over the years, but 2-3X more has never been divulged publicly.
Trend data continues to be gathered; however the units that fail completely and lead to catastrophic events are too destroyed to conclusively determine which source provided the bearing. We can only gather the data from the hundreds that have been caught during failure and by taking apart the thousands that have been returned to us and LN that were replaced electively. This is ongoing and always will be.
Absolutely.
Lots of information concerning these bearings has been posted over the years, but 2-3X more has never been divulged publicly.
"Hundreds" I believe but I'm having a hard time swallowing your "thousands" of returned IMS. 1k-2k range I can see but your post makes it sound like quite a bit more outside this range. Is there really more than 2k of returned IMS to date? Not expecting you to answer it and even if you did, I'm sure you'll have a lot of skeptics.
#18
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#20
Former Vendor
So we have to buy your book to find out the info I guess.
The book is on the topic of the assembly of the M96 engine, but includes a few extra chapters, one of which shares IMSB info that has never been shared before. That section of the book will also be released as an E book, available as an individual offering.
"Hundreds" I believe but I'm having a hard time swallowing your "thousands" of returned IMS. 1k-2k range I can see but your post makes it sound like quite a bit more outside this range.
Is there really more than 2k of returned IMS to date?
Not expecting you to answer it and even if you did, I'm sure you'll have a lot of skeptics.
The people that don't believe this is a problem are only being unfair to themselves.
Here are a few we pulled over the summer.. We have them logged into the system and now we just need to cut them open and gather the trend data from them Vs mileage and etc. Pardon the mess, I just dumped these out of a bin and took the picture :-)
#21
Just like the flu shot. It's amazing how much hype and marketing has made the flu shot manufacturers a bit richer.(not a slam to you but just tryng to make an analogy that fear can sell a lot of things)
#22
Former Vendor
Wow, that's a number I would've never expected since the bearing hasn't been out a very long time, relatively speaking.
But fear does play a pivotal role so I guess it's not really 100% surprising.
When I started working with these engines there were no options. If the IMS bearing even STARTED to fail, there was no way to remove it and was no replacement bearing, or flange or extraction tools. Then many engines were trashed that could have been saved with just a retrofit today.
Just like the flu shot. It's amazing how much hype and marketing has made the flu shot manufacturers a bit richer.(not a slam to you but just tryng to make an analogy that fear can sell a lot of things)
#23
Yes I've heard all your marketing before in several posts so nothing new except to the newcomers that might've not heard your speech yet.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
#24
Former Vendor
Yes I've heard all your marketing before in several posts so nothing new except to the newcomers that might've not heard your speech yet.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
#25
To backup Jake,
You have to admin that when someone like Jake Raby sees porsche engine blown up by the dozen each week. You can't expect him to have any other attitude than paranoid about the 996 engine. Sales tactics or not, there is no denying that a bunch of those engine are blowing up. And for cars that are babied most of the time, it is even more of a fact to consider.
Personally I would not own one without extended warranty.
You have to admin that when someone like Jake Raby sees porsche engine blown up by the dozen each week. You can't expect him to have any other attitude than paranoid about the 996 engine. Sales tactics or not, there is no denying that a bunch of those engine are blowing up. And for cars that are babied most of the time, it is even more of a fact to consider.
Personally I would not own one without extended warranty.
#26
Race Director
Fair enough
Wow, that's a number I would've never expected since the bearing hasn't been out a very long time, relatively speaking. But fear does play a pivotal role so I guess it's not really 100% surprising.
Just like the flu shot. It's amazing how much hype and marketing has made the flu shot manufacturers a bit richer.(not a slam to you but just tryng to make an analogy that fear can sell a lot of things)
Wow, that's a number I would've never expected since the bearing hasn't been out a very long time, relatively speaking. But fear does play a pivotal role so I guess it's not really 100% surprising.
Just like the flu shot. It's amazing how much hype and marketing has made the flu shot manufacturers a bit richer.(not a slam to you but just tryng to make an analogy that fear can sell a lot of things)
Yes I've heard all your marketing before in several posts so nothing new except to the newcomers that might've not heard your speech yet.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
The "Requests" are partially driven by fear and you have done a great job at it.
There is nothing wrong with Capitalism and you have been great at marketing, developing, and researching your product and audience. And whether one decides to do the IMS retrofit or not, it's great that there is that option out there for the ones that do. It must be great for your business that Porsche has produced so many 996 and 997's.
A 996 owner with fear of an IMSB failure are completely rational. While the overall percentage is likely low, the financial damage if you are one of the unlucky ones is huge.
Jake has made it a point to provide the information, and from what I've seen he is factual, albeit a bit biased given that all he sees are broken cars every day.
That said, a lot of 996 owners would rather stick fingers in their ears or cover their eyes and scream "la la la la la" than admit that there ARE legitimate issues with the M96/7 engines.
Why you want to keep poking the bear on this I'm not sure. No one is forced to buy, but some people seem to see the value, for peace of mind or otherwise.
#27
I've heard it all before in your other posts yet you can't just walk away. You always find yourself back in the same spot. Face it, you've got the patents, knowledge, and unique product that is one of the few if not only product like it in the marketplace. You've got the marketing skills clearly and you probably need to support your family or need money for something else.
If you are going to have more of a distributor's model and let resellers deal with people, are you also not going to be posting here as well then since you don't want to deal with "people"?
I don't really understand why you are being so defensive and maybe you are assuming some things or reading into things more. Oh well... The Jake legacy shall live on....
If you are going to have more of a distributor's model and let resellers deal with people, are you also not going to be posting here as well then since you don't want to deal with "people"?
I don't really understand why you are being so defensive and maybe you are assuming some things or reading into things more. Oh well... The Jake legacy shall live on....
#28
what a douche.
A 996 owner with fear of an IMSB failure are completely rational. While the overall percentage is likely low, the financial damage if you are one of the unlucky ones is huge.
Jake has made it a point to provide the information, and from what I've seen he is factual, albeit a bit biased given that all he sees are broken cars every day.
That said, a lot of 996 owners would rather stick fingers in their ears or cover their eyes and scream "la la la la la" than admit that there ARE legitimate issues with the M96/7 engines.
Why you want to keep poking the bear on this I'm not sure. No one is forced to buy, but some people seem to see the value, for peace of mind or otherwise.
A 996 owner with fear of an IMSB failure are completely rational. While the overall percentage is likely low, the financial damage if you are one of the unlucky ones is huge.
Jake has made it a point to provide the information, and from what I've seen he is factual, albeit a bit biased given that all he sees are broken cars every day.
That said, a lot of 996 owners would rather stick fingers in their ears or cover their eyes and scream "la la la la la" than admit that there ARE legitimate issues with the M96/7 engines.
Why you want to keep poking the bear on this I'm not sure. No one is forced to buy, but some people seem to see the value, for peace of mind or otherwise.
Here's the breakdown on how I see it just to clarify.
- Jake is VERY knowledgable about the M series engines
- He has contributed greatly to the Porsche community by offering a solution to a potential IMS failures
- He has gone above and beyond that by not resting on his initial design but taking it further(we shall see what that is).
- There is that potential artificial fear that some feel is generated by him
- We have no conclusive proof on pinpointing exactly what makes the IMS fail(bad batch, manufacturing, different manufacturers, etc) and if it will fail in all engines.
- In the mean time, it is a highly individual decision by each owner to elect to have this done or not. We shouldn't criticize owners for doing or not doing the procedure.
- Fan boys will always come to Jakes defense regardless.
- I've observed a bit of ego boost in his statements lately compared to when he first started posting about this subject which frankly makes hims sound a bit high and mighty.
#29
Former Vendor
you probably need to support your family or need money for something else.
We do this work because we love the challenges, the problem solving and helping those who desperately need us; generally when no one else can help them. I just like to work on things, no matter what they are and honestly the more problematic and misunderstood they are, the more I love it.
Marketing skills? They didn't teach us those in Special Ed.
#30
Three Wheelin'
Completely non-sequitur, but a book on DIY rebuilding of the motors is a great idea. As these cares are getting more and more into the DIY price range, I can see a ton of demand for such publication.
Hell I'd bundle that with special tool sales / rental program.
Hell I'd bundle that with special tool sales / rental program.