Short Shift Decision - 997 or 997 SSK
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Short Shift Decision - 997 or 997 SSK
Ok, been avoiding it, but drove a friends 05 997S the other day. Very nice car, really liked the way it shifted - a lot. It has the 997 SSK installed, very smooth, not notchy at all, effortless to shift.
I have a B&M SSK that I installed about 5 years ago. Very notchy, 1st can be a pain when cold. Never really warmed up to it.
What I would like are opinions on the 997 shifter upgrade and the 997 SSK that anyone has installed in a 996. Have searched and found a lot of info, I know, I know, everyone has different tastes, but wanted some more recent info, especially if someone has driven both.
Thanks!
I have a B&M SSK that I installed about 5 years ago. Very notchy, 1st can be a pain when cold. Never really warmed up to it.
What I would like are opinions on the 997 shifter upgrade and the 997 SSK that anyone has installed in a 996. Have searched and found a lot of info, I know, I know, everyone has different tastes, but wanted some more recent info, especially if someone has driven both.
Thanks!
#3
I have a SSK in my 09 Carrera S. Had a chance to drive a 997 GT3 at the track and knew that the standard long throw shifter in my car had to go. Huge improvement...but the feel does not replicate the feel of the GT3. The GT3 throw feels shorter and less delicate. The SSK is a great investment... but even with that improvement... the mechanism is inferior to an S-2000 Honda or short shifter on the Mazda MX5 in my opinion.
#4
I've had the B&M SSK before I swapped out to the regular 997 shifter.
If you're coming from the B&M and have grown accustom to the short shifting action, I would go with the 997 SSK and get the best of both worlds in terms of shorter shifts and great feel.
An SSK has been a prerequisite for all my cars I've driven in the last 20 years, however starting last year it hasn't been a priority for some reason to have one. Maybe I'm getting older or the fact that I moved to the suburbs and commute via public transportation. I dunno...
I've been ok with the slightly reduced throw of the regular 997 shifter for the price I paid. However with everyone talking about how great the 997 ssk feels, I might have to cough up the extra dough and upgrade soon. I might also upgrade the stock plastic shift linkage with a billet one like Agency has or something like it while I'm in there.
my $.02
If you're coming from the B&M and have grown accustom to the short shifting action, I would go with the 997 SSK and get the best of both worlds in terms of shorter shifts and great feel.
An SSK has been a prerequisite for all my cars I've driven in the last 20 years, however starting last year it hasn't been a priority for some reason to have one. Maybe I'm getting older or the fact that I moved to the suburbs and commute via public transportation. I dunno...
I've been ok with the slightly reduced throw of the regular 997 shifter for the price I paid. However with everyone talking about how great the 997 ssk feels, I might have to cough up the extra dough and upgrade soon. I might also upgrade the stock plastic shift linkage with a billet one like Agency has or something like it while I'm in there.
my $.02
#5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys for the replies, much appreciated.
I am fairly convinced I am going the 997 SSK route, would like to hear of anyone that has this installed in a 996.
NZ951 - I think from what I have read that the GT3 is identical to the 997 shift console upgrade (throw length 15% shorter than stock), except for billet aluminum bushings instead of plastic. Don't know if that changes the feel or not.
Not4Off - Duplicating the feel from the 997 to the 996 is what I am after (at least similar). Want to get rid of the notchy feel. I had a miata a long time ago, great shifting car and a lot of fun.
alpine003 - drove the 997 with ssk and the throws seemed longer than the B&M, which I am fine with (still shorter than stock), and there was zero notchy-ness which is what I liked. Shifting was very smooth. I grew up in the Chicago area, loved it, miss it.
I am fairly convinced I am going the 997 SSK route, would like to hear of anyone that has this installed in a 996.
NZ951 - I think from what I have read that the GT3 is identical to the 997 shift console upgrade (throw length 15% shorter than stock), except for billet aluminum bushings instead of plastic. Don't know if that changes the feel or not.
Not4Off - Duplicating the feel from the 997 to the 996 is what I am after (at least similar). Want to get rid of the notchy feel. I had a miata a long time ago, great shifting car and a lot of fun.
alpine003 - drove the 997 with ssk and the throws seemed longer than the B&M, which I am fine with (still shorter than stock), and there was zero notchy-ness which is what I liked. Shifting was very smooth. I grew up in the Chicago area, loved it, miss it.
#7
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding is that B&M does make some Porsche oem sport shifters (not sure exactly all that are included), however, I have the B&M in a 996 box/frame/cradle and don't like it due to the notchiness. Drove a 997 ssk, no notchiness. Also, from everything I have read, this is the common consensus.
Comparing a pic of the 997 ssk (see below, courtesy of Suncoast Porsche) and the B&M (other pic below), they do not look exactly the same, I am assuming that the standalone B&M ssk is a slightly different design, even if it may be the same manufacturer (which again, not sure). Also, after owning the B&M for 5 years, the 997 ssk is a world of difference, I like it better, some don't. Maybe it's all the metal in the B&M version, don't know.
B&M is $240-$285 and is the shifter only, the 997 ssk is shifter and cradle assembly for $429, I would spend the extra $190 for dramatic change in shift feel (to my preference) and the added bonus of a cradle I can easily swap out.
Comparing a pic of the 997 ssk (see below, courtesy of Suncoast Porsche) and the B&M (other pic below), they do not look exactly the same, I am assuming that the standalone B&M ssk is a slightly different design, even if it may be the same manufacturer (which again, not sure). Also, after owning the B&M for 5 years, the 997 ssk is a world of difference, I like it better, some don't. Maybe it's all the metal in the B&M version, don't know.
B&M is $240-$285 and is the shifter only, the 997 ssk is shifter and cradle assembly for $429, I would spend the extra $190 for dramatic change in shift feel (to my preference) and the added bonus of a cradle I can easily swap out.
Trending Topics
#10
#11
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
Rennlist Member
No notchiness at all. And I drove a car with the "other" non-Porsche shifter and hated it. The 997 SSK bolts right in and provides a nice tight controlled shift. One of my better upgrades...
#14
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Decision made, 997ssk it is. Thanks for everyone's input!