Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Why are 996's so cheap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2009, 07:29 PM
  #46  
Ahmet
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ahmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 3,520
Received 32 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

The 996s that are pampered, garaged and well taken care of will be just fine.

I've owned many older Porsches, and I for one certainly would not argue that older Porsches were built "better". I am personally only interested in the "classic" 911, the 996 and vaguely the 997, and would not own a 993 or 964. To each his own...
Ahmet is offline  
Old 09-26-2009, 08:20 PM
  #47  
Franklin229
Rennlist Member
 
Franklin229's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 2,686
Received 89 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ahmet
I've owned many older Porsches, and I for one certainly would not argue that older Porsches were built "better".
Agree-
Franklin229 is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 05:50 AM
  #48  
j-no
Intermediate
 
j-no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Franklin229, wow, where did you go to school. I went to CCS is Detroit.
When going through the buying process I drove both 993 and 996 as they were roughly close in price at the time.
In researching the faults of both models I came across the engine port clogging issues of the 993(please forgive my lack of precise terminology, it's been a while). I live in CA with strict smog testing. The ports clog, you fail smog, can't drive car. It seems the issue is with soft valve guides if I remember correctly. Correct me if I'm wrong. In research it seems the probability of this happening was very high, between 50-80%. The only countermeasure is an expensive head rebuild.
In 996's the spectre of catastrophic engine fail looms large, noone knows the exact numbers, but I figured, with all of the cars produced, it has to be relatively uncommon. Probably no more than 20%.
I figured the better bet was with the 996 in that scenario.
I drive my 996 everyday. It's perfect for that. I had a coworker buy a 993 C4S the same time I bought my car. He's since sold his car. I still have mine. The word on the street was it was unsuitable for daily use eventually.
Congrats on not having any mechanical faults with your car. That's awesome. I have to believe that is more the exception than the norm.
We have a saying in our studio,...an old car is just an old car. My 996 is @10 yrs old now! I had a loaner Cayman S for a weekend a few months ago, and I have to say it drove better than my car in almost every way possible. It was phenomenal.
j-no is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 06:53 AM
  #49  
Franklin229
Rennlist Member
 
Franklin229's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 2,686
Received 89 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by j-no
Franklin229, wow, where did you go to school. I went to CCS is Detroit.
When going through the buying process I drove both 993 and 996 as they were roughly close in price at the time.
In researching the faults of both models I came across the engine port clogging issues of the 993(please forgive my lack of precise terminology, it's been a while). I live in CA with strict smog testing. The ports clog, you fail smog, can't drive car. It seems the issue is with soft valve guides if I remember correctly. Correct me if I'm wrong. In research it seems the probability of this happening was very high, between 50-80%. The only countermeasure is an expensive head rebuild.
In 996's the spectre of catastrophic engine fail looms large, noone knows the exact numbers, but I figured, with all of the cars produced, it has to be relatively uncommon. Probably no more than 20%.
I figured the better bet was with the 996 in that scenario.
I drive my 996 everyday. It's perfect for that. I had a coworker buy a 993 C4S the same time I bought my car. He's since sold his car. I still have mine. The word on the street was it was unsuitable for daily use eventually.
Congrats on not having any mechanical faults with your car. That's awesome. I have to believe that is more the exception than the norm.
We have a saying in our studio,...an old car is just an old car. My 996 is @10 yrs old now! I had a loaner Cayman S for a weekend a few months ago, and I have to say it drove better than my car in almost every way possible. It was phenomenal.
I went to SU for Industrial Design, '84. You are correct with regards to both 993 and 996. They all have issues-maybe I have been lucky but I firmly believe the internet happens to draw out the most extreme scenarios re: mechanical issues. I have never personally met a 993 owner with the SAI issue, nor have I met a 996 owner with RMS. Also note that X% of 996's with issues vs X% of 993's is apples to oranges due to differences in production numbers- who knows. The combo of build quality, design details drew me to the purchase of my car. I think all 911's are somewhat reliable-just made/designed differently. I like the Cayman S as well-got to drive a buddy's loaner. It was fun but a little too cramped for me.
Franklin229 is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 11:20 AM
  #50  
salayc
Rennlist Member
 
salayc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Montreal
Posts: 803
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

J-No, first, let me congratulate you on your posts. We need more of this on these board. Your opinions are solidly grounded in logic and backed up appropriately. Most of the rest argue in circles using terms and opinions like "better" or "worse" without first defining what those terms mean in context, so thanks.

As far as pricing goes, it all falls downhill from the auctions. The reality is: a MK1 996 is selling for $10-$15k at auction. (Yes, an '01 996 is $15k right now) That's a verifiable number that is a good indicator of demand and street price. Those of you who want $20K plus for a '99 are bucking the trend. I think the reasons are a bit of everything previously mentioned and a bit more, but the end result is people don't want these cars in the same way they want other models. A good case study might be the 928 where a shift in design direction made the car a tough sell a few years later. Sound a bit like the 996?
salayc is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 04:18 PM
  #51  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

If anyone claims the older 911's are built better than the 996, they must have limited knowledge of these cars IMO.

They both have their strengths and weaknesses.

I would take the entire suspension/steering system from a 996 over any previous 911 just like I would take the engine externals of an older 911 over a 996.

Carpet in the 996 is far superior to previous years.

Sheetmetal is a toss up.

Interior IMO is nicer in the 996 except the dash, the older ones were friggin' robust!

Layout of wiring and pedal assembly under the dash of a 996 is better than older ones. I almost crashed at >120 MPH due to the design of the older pedal assemblies "over Engineering"
Tippy is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 05:23 PM
  #52  
BlueRiver86
Nordschleife Master
 
BlueRiver86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tippy
If anyone claims the older 911's are built better than the 996, they must have limited knowledge of these cars IMO.

They both have their strengths and weaknesses.

I would take the entire suspension/steering system from a 996 over any previous 911 just like I would take the engine externals of an older 911 over a 996.

Carpet in the 996 is far superior to previous years.

Sheetmetal is a toss up.

Interior IMO is nicer in the 996 except the dash, the older ones were friggin' robust!

Layout of wiring and pedal assembly under the dash of a 996 is better than older ones. I almost crashed at >120 MPH due to the design of the older pedal assemblies "over Engineering"
These types of advances in technology over time have happened in every model line. Quality of construction is another issue.
BlueRiver86 is offline  
Old 09-27-2009, 06:06 PM
  #53  
salayc
Rennlist Member
 
salayc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Montreal
Posts: 803
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Clean looking car Cory.
salayc is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 04:07 AM
  #54  
j-no
Intermediate
 
j-no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the compliment salayc! I'm really an artist at heart, but having gone through the feasibility process a few times (making a sketch(what I do) into a real car(what the engineers do)) and having to explain/rationalize my designs to the engineers I've been forced to learn a little logic over the years.
Franklin229! Are you still designing? The interior of a 993 is more spacious than a Cayman?...I guess you have the back seat. Technically, I think the 993 is a better looking car. The surfacing/ highlighting of the 993 is perfect. The 996 doors, the highlights are just atrocious. According to a conversation I had at a beach party with the exterior designer of the Cayman, he said BMW did the stampings(made the tools maybe?) for the 996 ext, and both companies blame the other for the poor stampings.
As a designer I love that the 996 is the first all new 911 since the 60's. The exterior shape is just so new and unusual for Porsche, so full of vitality. I'm sure the 997 is a better car, but man, did they take a giant step back into the old. The surfacing is almost frumpy.
To get back on topic, I am a little dissapointed in my resale value trajectory. A lot of it is supply and demand I think. The 993 market definitely has a collectors slant to it, almost a closed market, Porsche's for Porsche people only. The 996 is still more of mass consumer car market at the moment. Maybe after 10 yrs or so, and a sizeable portion of the 996 population is destroyed the remaining good cars will stand out and stabilize the market. I can only hope.
j-no is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 09:35 AM
  #55  
wellcraft290
Three Wheelin'
 
wellcraft290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,779
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I find thsi very funny talk about why the 996 is so cheap. Well is is due to the percieved isssues of the RMS etc and then on top of that the 996 is really a boring looking car in the base form. Plus there prices are down because noone wants them for these reasons. Ask anyone and if they tell you they are dying for a 996 [unch him.

the 993 and 964 are just as fast have a/c, heat and all the other features. Ok no memory seats.
when you drive your 996 does anyone even look at the car? I know in my 964 I get looks thumb ups people screaming that they love my car. That is why my value is higher
wellcraft290 is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:17 AM
  #56  
deckman
Burning Brakes
 
deckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wellcraft, when you come to the forum with the intent to insult all the 996 owners, perhaps you should consider making your points in a manner that don't make you sound like a twelve year old. Did you type your post on your phone?
deckman is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:26 AM
  #57  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wellcraft290
the 993 and 964 are just as fast have a/c, heat and all the other features.
^^ Proof that you have no idea what you are talking about...
Ray S is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:44 AM
  #58  
Marc Gelefsky
Super Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Gelefsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 16,142
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wellcraft290
I find thsi very funny talk about why the 996 is so cheap. Well is is due to the percieved isssues of the RMS etc and then on top of that the 996 is really a boring looking car in the base form. Plus there prices are down because noone wants them for these reasons. Ask anyone and if they tell you they are dying for a 996 [unch him.

the 993 and 964 are just as fast have a/c, heat and all the other features. Ok no memory seats.
when you drive your 996 does anyone even look at the car? I know in my 964 I get looks thumb ups people screaming that they love my car. That is why my value is higher
Well, this post sure is usefull.
Marc Gelefsky is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:50 AM
  #59  
Phil G.
Race Car
 
Phil G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suburban Philly
Posts: 3,897
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wellcraft290
When you drive your 996 does anyone even look at the car?
Yeah, they looked at it - mainly because they couldn't believe it was out of the garage and I was actually driving it!!

But seriously, have a peek at this 4S - do you think anyone looked at this car? Did you take just a quick look, Champ??
Attached Images  
Phil G. is offline  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:52 AM
  #60  
ivangene
Parts Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
ivangene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,326
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wellcraft290
people screaming that they love my car. That is why my value is higher

yea baby - when I drive I get people screaming too, not sure what they are screaming though sometimes I back up and ask them...

I liked one that screamed "slow down!" when I was going 20 in a 25 zone ? actually that happened twice now ?

I think the 996 just looks SO much faster than the 993












hahahhahahahha!!
ivangene is offline  


Quick Reply: Why are 996's so cheap?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:34 PM.