X-51 dyno graph...for no particular reason.
#18
#21
#23
Instructor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 1
From: Where the Smokies meet the Blue Ridge mountains
I have a replacement 3.6L in my 2002 with about 10k miles since replacement - it pulls noticeably better than the former engine. I generally can hold my own with any 3.8L C2S on the track in the straights.
These cars are awesome....
#24
I doubt that, but who really cares what it is at the crank? People always say silly things like "add 20% drivetrain loss" I have no idea where they get those stats from. Unless you pull the motor out of the car and run it on a motor dyno, it's irrelevant.
#25
Instructor
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 1
From: Where the Smokies meet the Blue Ridge mountains
Thanks for the thoughts.
#26
I have had many engines on either of my engine dynos in the lab then applied them directly into a vehicle and tested them on my dynojet. The consistent number is 17-22% based on brakes, tires and camber/toe variations...
I test engines both at the flywheel and at the rear wheels when possible, but lots of what we do is shipped far, far away... One is coming in from Russia right now!
I test engines both at the flywheel and at the rear wheels when possible, but lots of what we do is shipped far, far away... One is coming in from Russia right now!