Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Tire ratings from PORSCHEUSA.COM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2009, 12:45 AM
  #1  
Michael-Dallas
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 600
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Tire ratings from PORSCHEUSA.COM

I don't know if this has been posted before, but PORSCHEUSA.COM has tire ratings for the 986 / 996 for Summer and Winter.

Of particular interest are the Summer ratings. Given all the internet hooplah on the M3 forums and Porsche forums, I would have thought the Michelin Pilot Sport [PS2] N3 to have the God-like ratings, but they only got 2 star (very good) for both dry and wet handling. The Pirelli P-Zero Rosso N4 got the top marks, 3 star (excellent), for both dry and wet handling, while the Continental ContiSportContact N2 got 3 star for dry and 2 star for wet. Then again, these ratings are for the 8x18/11x18 wheels... check the tire ratings for your wheel size.

Personally, I'm a Continental man myself. They were excellent value for my M3.

///Michael
Old 02-02-2009, 09:29 AM
  #2  
Ubermensch
Rennlist Member
 
Ubermensch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,106
Received 160 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Nice find, thanks.
Old 02-02-2009, 10:17 AM
  #3  
DCP
Burning Brakes
 
DCP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,176
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes, nice find.

I am totally amused that they list the performance rating separately for the front and rear tires.
Old 02-02-2009, 10:27 AM
  #4  
Thundertub
Rennlist Member
 
Thundertub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,288
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Excellent posting. Thank you!
Lots of folks are always asking which replacement tires they should pick. This will help them decide much better that 122 responses from folks with opinions rather than facts.
Old 02-02-2009, 11:05 AM
  #5  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Michael,

I don't disagree with the Pirelli P-Zero Rosso rating. I had them on my car originally and I loved the grip they provided. However, I got only about 9K to 11K miles on each set of rears so I was replacing them every 9 to 10 months. When I switched to PS2s I had 14K on them when I returned the car to the leasing company and still had about 60% tire tread remaining. I think they would have gotten about 25K miles on them.
Old 02-02-2009, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Michael-Dallas
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 600
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

No problem guys; there's been big debate in the past on the M3 forums on which OEM-supplied tire is better, the Michelin PS or Contis and almost every time, it's deadlocked between the crowd that can tell a difference w/ the Michelins and the crowd that can't. One thread even got one professional engineer, that did all the physics (and was against the Michelins), banned. It seemed that some felt that since the Michelins were significantly more expensive than the Contis, then it had to be equally more good over the Contis.

It seems that the tire debate goes on here as well so I figured I'd post the "official" PCNA "statement."

And Tim, 14k on the PS2's and you still had 60% tread left? I hope you are referring to the Honda...

///Michael
Old 02-02-2009, 12:19 PM
  #7  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The PS2's did well in the Tire Rack survey. Number 1

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey...ay.jsp?type=MP
Old 02-02-2009, 12:29 PM
  #8  
Michael-Dallas
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 600
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

A few of things to consider:

1- Those ratings are based on owners that buy them... which goes back to what I said regarding the M3 forum threads... some people think that since they cost $$$$, then it must be sliced bread.

2- If I had some seriously crappy tires that were also worn, then went to Michelin PS2, then I would be raving about the PS2 as well. Just like claims that people can feel smoothness after they replace the transmission fluid w/ Redline fluid... well, yeah, you're gonna notice a difference, especially if the old fluid has many miles on it. The real test is to replace w/ OEM for xxx miles, then replace w/ Redline for xxx milies, then compare, but I digress...

3- Last but not least, a Michelin PS2 isn't necessarily the exact same tire as a Porsche N-rated Michelin PS2. Personally, w/ my M3, I couldn't tell a difference on the street (and even on the track) between the OEM Michelin PS and OEM Contis, except that the Michelins made my wallet significantly lighter.

YMMV.

///Michael
Old 02-02-2009, 12:31 PM
  #9  
Chuck Jones
Drifting
 
Chuck Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Elk Grove, California
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Tim: You know I never doubt your word, BUT...in this instance it appears that your memory might be getting a bit hazy.....60% left after 14K miles ?? Your car must have spent a lot of time on the back of a flatbed for most of those miles. You know that being towed on a flatbed doesn't count right??.....I drove conservatively, and never managed to get more than 14K out of a set of rears...no launches etc.
Old 02-02-2009, 12:31 PM
  #10  
Chuck Jones
Drifting
 
Chuck Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Elk Grove, California
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Tim: You know I never doubt your word, BUT...in this instance it appears that your memory might be getting a bit hazy.....60% left after 14K miles ?? Your car must have spent a lot of time on the back of a flatbed for most of those miles. You know that being towed on a flatbed doesn't count right??.....I drove conservatively, and never managed to get more than 14K out of a set of rear Michelin's...no launches etc.
Old 02-02-2009, 12:51 PM
  #11  
zroadhouse
Racer
 
zroadhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mmm, good thing my S-02As are getting worn out. Looks like they got the crap rating here.
Old 02-02-2009, 01:33 PM
  #12  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,084
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Jones
Tim: You know I never doubt your word, BUT...in this instance it appears that your memory might be getting a bit hazy.....60% left after 14K miles ?? Your car must have spent a lot of time on the back of a flatbed for most of those miles. You know that being towed on a flatbed doesn't count right??.....I drove conservatively, and never managed to get more than 14K out of a set of rear Michelin's...no launches etc.
Chuck,

Maybe I got better mileage from my tires because maybe my *** is lighter than yours!

Seriously, the only reason I remember the 60% is because the inspector for the leasing company came out and took pics of the car and measured the tread depth and wrote something like "60% tread remaining" in the inspection form. However, the tread wear bar is probably 2/32nd above the bottom of the groves so I guess, technecally, there was only 40% tread remaining on the tires. I am pretty certain I could have gotten at least another 6K miles out of the rears.
Old 02-02-2009, 01:56 PM
  #13  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael-Dallas
A few of things to consider:

1- Those ratings are based on owners that buy them... which goes back to what I said regarding the M3 forum threads... some people think that since they cost $$$$, then it must be sliced bread.
True, and that's what makes ratings like this so useful. They represent the opinions of those that have actually purchased and used the tires. I'm not sure why you think $$ factor into peoples opinions. If anything I'd imagine people would rate them more stringently because they are expensive. If something cost me more I have even higher expectations for that product (not lower).

Originally Posted by Michael-Dallas
2- If I had some seriously crappy tires that were also worn, then went to Michelin PS2, then I would be raving about the PS2 as well. Just like claims that people can feel smoothness after they replace the transmission fluid w/ Redline fluid... well, yeah, you're gonna notice a difference, especially if the old fluid has many miles on it. The real test is to replace w/ OEM for xxx miles, then replace w/ Redline for xxx milies, then compare, but I digress...
All of the tires reviewed would be subject to this potential bias

Originally Posted by Michael-Dallas
3- Last but not least, a Michelin PS2 isn't necessarily the exact same tire as a Porsche N-rated Michelin PS2. Personally, w/ my M3, I couldn't tell a difference on the street (and even on the track) between the OEM Michelin PS and OEM Contis, except that the Michelins made my wallet significantly lighter.
True not all of the PS2's reviewed will be N-Spec. However, the same holds true for the Conti's and the Pirelli's.

I certainly wouldn't consider a survey like this to be in any way statistically significant. However the user comments are interesting to look at.

Personally, I have used the P-zero's, Conti's, and MPS's on my cars. I think the MPS is the best of the bunch. The Conti's weren't bad, but you couldn't pay me to put the P-Zero's back on. Their grip levels are good, but after they get some wear into them they get super noisy.
Old 02-02-2009, 06:17 PM
  #14  
Michael-Dallas
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 600
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray S
True, and that's what makes ratings like this so useful. They represent the opinions of those that have actually purchased and used the tires. I'm not sure why you think $$ factor into peoples opinions. If anything I'd imagine people would rate them more stringently because they are expensive. If something cost me more I have even higher expectations for that product (not lower).
I'm going to more weight on the ratings provided by a company that is built on and backed by years and years of racing. But that's not to say that I'm going to discount owner reviews.

The money thing -- it's the psychology of it. Spending big money on a big brand, it's got to be the best, right? When the Nissan 350z first came out, quite a few people ordered the most expensive model, the Track model, which had lightweight wheels and Brembo brakes. What's the first thing those owners did? Replace the lightweight wheels w/ aftermarket wheels and the brakes w/ a BBK. When asked why they bought a Track model if they were going to bling it out, the popular answer was... because it was the top of the line model.

///Michael
Old 02-09-2009, 08:40 PM
  #15  
chago996
Racer
 
chago996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I thought Michelin didn't make a 285 30 18 on the PS2 (N-rated nor non N-rated). But in checking the tire rack, its a new tire that's available in N-spec ($420-ouch). But its the first time I've seen Porsche do its N-rating on a tire for a car that is out of production (996.2) Interesting


Quick Reply: Tire ratings from PORSCHEUSA.COM



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:32 AM.