Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Talk me out of it.. Considering trade for M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2008, 05:42 PM
  #106  
arr0gant
Drifting
 
arr0gant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Saint Louis.
Posts: 2,129
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wellardmac
I'm sure I would love it. I need to replace one of my sedans in the next couple of years and I want a sedan version of my 911 in terms of being fun to drive on the road. The Panamera is my first choice, but if the price is unreasonable, then I'll make the M3 my second choice.
Right on, man. I very much look forward to hearing your thoughts after a drive.
Old 09-07-2008, 05:47 PM
  #107  
Wellardmac
Nordschleife Master
 
Wellardmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,279
Received 135 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arr0gant
Right on, man. I very much look forward to hearing your thoughts after a drive.
I expect to enjoy it, but I'm not expecting it to be like my 911 for the simple reasons of it being a bigger, heavier, and higher center of gravity. The laws of physics usually win.
Old 09-07-2008, 07:08 PM
  #108  
arr0gant
Drifting
 
arr0gant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Saint Louis.
Posts: 2,129
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

My car CONTINUES to defy laws of physics, I'm tellin' ya!

...or maybe I'm just justifying my purchase!!
Old 09-07-2008, 07:14 PM
  #109  
othomasjr
Racer
 
othomasjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cheraw, SC
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not ruling out a 2003 M3 I've come across. Are there any major problems that can happen? Like a motor failure in a Porsche?
Old 09-07-2008, 08:33 PM
  #110  
SC996
Instructor
 
SC996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got a aging 328i that I consider eplacing every now and then. The new sedans are too much for me with the 996, so would love to have an older couple.
Old 09-07-2008, 08:34 PM
  #111  
htny
Three Wheelin'
 
htny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY/LA
Posts: 1,558
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by othomasjr
I'm not ruling out a 2003 M3 I've come across. Are there any major problems that can happen? Like a motor failure in a Porsche?
Just buy CPO, no matter what you do, buy CPO.
Old 09-07-2008, 08:41 PM
  #112  
Wellardmac
Nordschleife Master
 
Wellardmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,279
Received 135 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arr0gant
My car CONTINUES to defy laws of physics, I'm tellin' ya!

...or maybe I'm just justifying my purchase!!

Old 09-08-2008, 12:05 AM
  #113  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Gant,

You crack me up. Now the M3 is a sports car?!?! Come on.....

I think you really need to look up the definitions of a "Sports Car", "Sports Sedan" and "GT". Here's a first hint for you, it is not determined by how quickly a car can circle a race track. I'm quite sure that a M5 can get around just about any track quicker than my Boxster, but I'm also sure that doesn't make it a sports car. If a new M3 does hustle around a track quicker than a 997S it may have just a little to do with that small matter of a ton of extra hp. (in fact if you look at ring times, the cars are 1 sec apart.......not too shabby for a 59 hp deficit)

I thought the Motor Trend handling article was interesting for what it was lacking.....sports cars. It had plenty of GT's and Sports sedans but few real sports cars. Why no MX-5, Cayman, 997S or GT3, Elise, Boxster, F430, Z06 or ZR1, and no Lambo?

I'll repeat what has been already said, the M3 is one heck of a sports sedan. The ones I have driven certainly had good power and felt very refined. However, they were all also much less involving (although more comfortable) than my 986 or 996. That doesn't make them bad, however it does make 'em different.

I think most in this thread are just trying to point out those obvious differences between an e46 M3 and a 996. I personally think they are far more different than a cursory look at their similar acceleration times might indicate. Those differences (that are glaringly obvious during a drive, especially on a track) are not so obvious if you just view 0-60 times that look somewhat close.

Just my opinion....
Old 09-08-2008, 12:31 AM
  #114  
dallasboats
Pro
 
dallasboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
I never claimed it was a better track car. I don't know, I haven't tracked either.

I would still take the M3 over the 996 because of the far nicer interior and better exterior (at least over the MK1).
and tell me, which one do you own. Oh yea, neither........ get a checkbook then an opinion.....
Old 09-08-2008, 02:14 AM
  #115  
medtech
Drifting
 
medtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,727
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Let's also qualify that the new incarnation of the M3 is a FAR cry better than let's say a 2003. 2 totally different beasts.

That being said...I'm still waiting for the Panamera!

ps. BMW is just a German Buick...Ha!
Old 09-09-2008, 12:04 AM
  #116  
eDoug
Instructor
 
eDoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Where the Smokies meet the Blue Ridge mountains
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arr0gant
But I DO find it hilarious that people who have never even DRIVEN the new M3 weigh in with a strong opinion. I don't even think a test drive on city or highway roads should count. Untill you've REALLY driven both HARD I don't see how you can weight in, that is if we're comparing them for track worthiness/handling at the limit.
I dunno - this thread is getting a bit argumentative. I've driven the new M3 on a track and I loved it. But... it's heavy, and even per my earlier posts, heavy is heavy... weight is a physical measurement that can't be confused, or corrected (much) in a street car.

Between cars, the new V8 M3 DROVE me to buy my "new" '02 996 C2.... okay, pun definitely intended.

Love both, but wanted one - one that met MY needs. I could be VERY happy, proud, and smiley driving the new M3. But my 996 makes me smile in so many more ways. It's brilliant - for my needs.


In the end, really just choice, choice is good. Don't lose sight of that.
Old 09-09-2008, 01:02 AM
  #117  
Tbred911
Three Wheelin'
 
Tbred911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eDoug
I dunno - this thread is getting a bit argumentative. I've driven the new M3 on a track and I loved it. But... it's heavy, and even per my earlier posts, heavy is heavy... weight is a physical measurement that can't be confused, or corrected (much) in a street car.

Between cars, the new V8 M3 DROVE me to buy my "new" '02 996 C2.... okay, pun definitely intended.

Love both, but wanted one - one that met MY needs. I could be VERY happy, proud, and smiley driving the new M3. But my 996 makes me smile in so many more ways. It's brilliant - for my needs.


In the end, really just choice, choice is good. Don't lose sight of that.
+1... amen.
Old 09-09-2008, 03:18 PM
  #118  
pat056
Rennlist Member
 
pat056's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Society Hill, SC
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had a 1990 964 that I traded for a 2002 M3. I traded back to the Porsche and now have a 964 race car and a 1999 996. The 996 experience is different than the M3. As a friend said, the M3 is like driving a Caddy compared to the 996. It's just a different experience. Softer would be my term.
The M3 is straight line fast! The brakes don't compare to the 996 at the track, but not terribly noticable on the street.
I too would take a 6 speed over an automatic, but that's me.
Orrin. Ownership of the M3 is about the same price wise as the 996. The 2002 E46 engine did have issues, but BMW stood behind it with a 100k transferrable warranty. Thankfully, I didn't have to test that warranty. To see what kind of issues BMW E46's have had, get on www.roadfly.com and do some research. I'm out of touch with these cars now.
Old 09-09-2008, 03:32 PM
  #119  
Al-x
Instructor
 
Al-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuttgart951
Im shocked at the level of emotion sneaking into these posts.

The E46 M3 is an amazing car. Amazing.

The 996 is also.

They are different.

Different does not = "better."

If you want the "ultimate" in sports car feel, light weight and communicative controls (all of which seem to be the 996 arguments), you might as well ditch both cars and go spend $5K on an old Miata.
Brilliantly spoken

Just buy what you like, none of us are going to have the pleasure or paying for nor driving whichever vehicle it is that you choose.
Old 09-09-2008, 07:09 PM
  #120  
dallasboats
Pro
 
dallasboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

NOPE, M3 OWNERS SUCK AND SO DO THEIR CARSSSSS....... They are slower in every aspect and this horse will never stop being kicked.


Quick Reply: Talk me out of it.. Considering trade for M3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 PM.