Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Just came back from a local Porsche shop - Interesting news (3.4l oiling)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2007, 02:05 PM
  #16  
DreamCarrera
Drifting
 
DreamCarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A twisty backroad in PA
Posts: 2,110
Received 127 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chads996
The information I provided is coming directly from an experienced engine builder. The car on the floor had a redline at 7800.

His shop was filled with race cars. As I do not know what your experience is building race motors, I'll take his word for it for now.

C.
As the RPM of an engine increases, so does the stress put on the various engine components. Porsche engines are designed to run for extended periods at high RPMs and you may very well be able to increase the facory redline of a 996 but make no mistake about it, doing so will also increase the stress on the engine dramatically.

I do not have experience building race car engines but this does not change the facts that I have stated. The 996's engine is certainly not bullet proof and increasing its factory redline will shorten the engines life-span. I am simply saying that you should take this into consideration if you choose to increase the factory programed redline. Of course, there is a big difference between hitting 7,800 RPM on the street here and there as opposed to hitting 7,800 RPMs all day at the track.


The 996 cup car engine is a pure race engine and its time between service intervals is measured in hours not miles. In order to extend the time between services, read rebuilds, Porsche recommends setting the redline lower on the engine. The lower the set redline the longer the engine can be run between service intervals. I think you would agree that Porsche has some experience building race engines, certainly more than a race shop in Georgia. LOL
Old 11-15-2007, 02:44 PM
  #17  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DreamCarrera
As the RPM of an engine increases, so does the stress put on the various engine components. Porsche engines are designed to run for extended periods at high RPMs and you may very well be able to increase the facory redline of a 996 but make no mistake about it, doing so will also increase the stress on the engine dramatically.

I do not have experience building race car engines but this does not change the facts that I have stated. The 996's engine is certainly not bullet proof and increasing its factory redline will shorten the engines life-span. I am simply saying that you should take this into consideration if you choose to increase the factory programed redline. Of course, there is a big difference between hitting 7,800 RPM on the street here and there as opposed to hitting 7,800 RPMs all day at the track.


The 996 cup car engine is a pure race engine and its time between service intervals is measured in hours not miles. In order to extend the time between services, read rebuilds, Porsche recommends setting the redline lower on the engine. The lower the set redline the longer the engine can be run between service intervals. I think you would agree that Porsche has some experience building race engines, certainly more than a race shop in Georgia. LOL
Uh...

There is just a bit more to it than simply just "increasing the factory redline."

Why on earth would that be the only thing done? When you increae the redline of a motor (any motor for that matter), the valve train needs to be improved. Meaning heavy springs, removal of hydraulic lifters and replaced with solid ones, heavier duty valve guides, the list goes on and on...

I was referring to a track only car in his shop. One that had a laundry list of modifications done to it.

Thanks for the obvious input though...

Old 11-15-2007, 04:45 PM
  #18  
DreamCarrera
Drifting
 
DreamCarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A twisty backroad in PA
Posts: 2,110
Received 127 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

FWIW, I was obviously not referring to a totally race prepped 3.4L motor. I was referring to those who simply chip their cars, many of the performance chips increase the engines redline without making any mods to the engines hardware. I was merely making the point that those that do this should maybe reconsider due to the incidents of engine failure reported by 996 owners. Many of my comments were far from obvious input to the uninitiated.

I don't appreciate the comment and pic BTW. I'll be in the Atlanta area in a few weeks, if that is were you are. I'd love to meet up and hear the captain comment in person.
Old 11-15-2007, 05:31 PM
  #19  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Feel free...beer is always available for other Porsche-geek's like me.

(and...relax about the comment. Everyone here will tell you my sense of humor is a bit twisted.)

Cold beer is waiting. Just shoot me a PM. In the meantime...

Old 11-16-2007, 02:26 AM
  #20  
AndrewWK
Instructor
 
AndrewWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 145
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The most obvious advantage of the 3.4L over the 3.6L when it comes to increasing redline is the fact that it's a shorter stroke motor. This means less friction on the most basic level. I do not know the specs on intake/exhaust valve geometry, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are identical, which means the 3.4L will also have an advantage at higher rpm levels.

3.6L 3.78 X 3.26
3.4L 3.78 X 3.07
Old 11-16-2007, 12:18 PM
  #21  
Benjamin Choi
Banned
 
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This thread cracks me up - so many QB Porsche engineers... LOL
Old 11-16-2007, 12:47 PM
  #22  
Doug Donsbach
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Doug Donsbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

QB?
Old 11-16-2007, 01:07 PM
  #23  
Chads996
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Chads996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Soowanee, GA
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewWK
The most obvious advantage of the 3.4L over the 3.6L when it comes to increasing redline is the fact that it's a shorter stroke motor. This means less friction on the most basic level. I do not know the specs on intake/exhaust valve geometry, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are identical, which means the 3.4L will also have an advantage at higher rpm levels.

3.6L 3.78 X 3.26
3.4L 3.78 X 3.07

Ding, Ding - WINNAR!!

Exactly what the tech said...nicely done.

C.
Old 11-16-2007, 01:17 PM
  #24  
TheSpeedDemon
Three Wheelin'
 
TheSpeedDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oakley, California
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Chad I have subscribed to this thread now, and again thanks
Old 11-16-2007, 03:15 PM
  #25  
Benjamin Choi
Banned
 
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Donsbach
QB?
armchair
Old 11-16-2007, 08:53 PM
  #26  
AndrewWK
Instructor
 
AndrewWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 145
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
This thread cracks me up - so many QB Porsche engineers... LOL
What cracks me up is the number of folks around here who believe these Porsche engineers didn't leave a drop of power on the table.
Old 11-16-2007, 09:43 PM
  #27  
BruceP
Drifting
 
BruceP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewWK
What cracks me up is the number of folks around here who believe these Porsche engineers didn't leave a drop of power on the table.
What cracks me up is people who think that Porsche left power on the table because they're stupider than some dudes on the internet.

Every roadgoing engine has more power in it, if you're willing to make the sacrifices necessary to get it. Those sacrifices can be noise, fuel economy, emissions, low speed driveability, reliability, durability, on and on.

Any dolt can make an engine do one thing well. If only my car just had to do one thing.
Old 11-16-2007, 11:56 PM
  #28  
AndrewWK
Instructor
 
AndrewWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 145
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BruceP
What cracks me up is people who think that Porsche left power on the table because they're stupider than some dudes on the internet.

Every roadgoing engine has more power in it, if you're willing to make the sacrifices necessary to get it. Those sacrifices can be noise, fuel economy, emissions, low speed driveability, reliability, durability, on and on.

Any dolt can make an engine do one thing well. If only my car just had to do one thing.
I don't believe anyone here called anyone stupid (at least until you did). When taking anything from the design stage to a viable consumer product many compromises and engineering decisions have to be made along the way. (If you've ever taken part in creating a consumer product, you would understand this) And what is the number one priority of any public company? profit. That means cost cutting and timetables. A basic real world example would be the plenum. Here's a part that was obviously a cost cutting measure on the original engine. We now have superior options available. This might come as a shock to some but Porsche is not divine and all-knowing. Their engineers cannot bend time or pass through walls. They have to deal with bean counters and bureaucratic red tape just like the rest of us. I'm sorry I had to be the one to tell you.


P.S. there is no Santa Claus
Old 11-17-2007, 01:43 AM
  #29  
BruceP
Drifting
 
BruceP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewWK
I don't believe anyone here called anyone stupid (at least until you did). When taking anything from the design stage to a viable consumer product many compromises and engineering decisions have to be made along the way. (If you've ever taken part in creating a consumer product, you would understand this) And what is the number one priority of any public company? profit. That means cost cutting and timetables. A basic real world example would be the plenum. Here's a part that was obviously a cost cutting measure on the original engine. We now have superior options available. This might come as a shock to some but Porsche is not divine and all-knowing. Their engineers cannot bend time or pass through walls. They have to deal with bean counters and bureaucratic red tape just like the rest of us. I'm sorry I had to be the one to tell you.


P.S. there is no Santa Claus
If I've ever taken part in creating a consumer product?

Don't bring a knife to this gunfight, my condescending friend. 28 years in marketing, here, including several years in the car business (Toyota and Honda). I hate to shatter your little socialist fantasy, but there are many things brought to bear on taking a product to market besides profit. That simplistic, consumer-as-victim view you have of the world is, in fact, often the reason that products aren't as good as they could be.

P.S. There is no 100 mpg carburetor.
Old 11-17-2007, 02:01 AM
  #30  
AndrewWK
Instructor
 
AndrewWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 145
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BruceP
If I've ever taken part in creating a consumer product?

Don't bring a knife to this gunfight, my condescending friend. 28 years in marketing, here, including several years in the car business (Toyota and Honda). I hate to shatter your little socialist fantasy, but there are many things brought to bear on taking a product to market besides profit. That simplistic, consumer-as-victim view you have of the world is, in fact, often the reason that products aren't as good as they could be.

P.S. There is no 100 mpg carburetor.
The phrase I used was "number one priority." Might want to read it again. Nothing "socialist" or "consumer-as-victim" about it. Far from it, actually. You are absolutely right there are lots of reasons, I was providing a basic example to give everyone an idea of what really happens. My perspective is (obviously) from the engineering side of things. What the engineer intends and designs is never exactly what makes it into the living room. Just to over simplify things again


Quick Reply: Just came back from a local Porsche shop - Interesting news (3.4l oiling)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:06 PM.