F/S 2004 911 C2 40th Anniversary Edition
#31
You ever notice that sometimes a car being sold with modifications to it that the owner will try to get 100% of the mod costs back?!
I was looking for a 40th before I got what I have now. It had most of the things that this car here has minus the short shifter and K40 and it had less than 9K miles on it. Sale price $57K. I didn't act soon enough and it was gone.
Low mileage?! I love that term. Watch on ebay some cars that are selling and some that are not. The prices for an equally equipped machine in the same model year but with mileage different, on at 9k and the other at 25k, will be listed and sell at the same price.
Good luck with the sale either way. Nice looking toy.
I was looking for a 40th before I got what I have now. It had most of the things that this car here has minus the short shifter and K40 and it had less than 9K miles on it. Sale price $57K. I didn't act soon enough and it was gone.
Low mileage?! I love that term. Watch on ebay some cars that are selling and some that are not. The prices for an equally equipped machine in the same model year but with mileage different, on at 9k and the other at 25k, will be listed and sell at the same price.
Good luck with the sale either way. Nice looking toy.
#32
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by TD in DC
No it doesn't.
The GT3 and the 40th are not even aimed at the same market.
If you want a track oriented car that you can use on the street AND you do not need back seats, then the GT3 is the car for you.
If you want a street oriented car that you can use on the track, OR if you need back seats, then the 40th is an outstanding choice.
They are really aimed at two entirely different market segments.
This price may be too high, but comparing the price to a GT3 doesn't help make that argument in my opinion since they are not even really competing for the same potential buyers.
A much better comparison is with other 996 coupes. Specifically, is the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD worth 30K? That is the question . . .
The GT3 and the 40th are not even aimed at the same market.
If you want a track oriented car that you can use on the street AND you do not need back seats, then the GT3 is the car for you.
If you want a street oriented car that you can use on the track, OR if you need back seats, then the 40th is an outstanding choice.
They are really aimed at two entirely different market segments.
This price may be too high, but comparing the price to a GT3 doesn't help make that argument in my opinion since they are not even really competing for the same potential buyers.
A much better comparison is with other 996 coupes. Specifically, is the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD worth 30K? That is the question . . .
Talking about resale value ($) Todd not track performance.
However, you comparo of a 996 with X51 and LSD is, I agree, the better route to go. But there is NOTHING wrong with comparing the two as I have. To say they are 2 differenet drivers isn't 100% the case. But for that price, like I (and others) have said, you are in Turbo territory and close to GT3 territory. The market the 40th might have been aimed at a specific buyer as you say it would be more representative of the Turbo crowd (fast blvd cruiser).
#33
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by TD in DC
Specifically, is the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD worth 30K? That is the question . . .
My take on the subject is.... I bought my car roughly the for the same price of a non-40th car so I'd expect to sell it for roughly the same price as a non-40th car. At the same (or $5k higher) asking price, I'd hope my car would be more desirable than a non-40th car and sell quicker. I don't see the car as a collector's item any more than targas, Titanium edition Cayennes, custom painted turquoise blue Boxsters, etc. One could make a valid argument that all of these models were limitied production, but not models that command a significant premium.... unless you have commemmorative luggage to go with it. With the luggage, you should be able to get an extra $10k.
#34
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by 03Targa
Also, 1963 is a number of cars that will be a collectors item, but it will take at least 30years to get there.
#35
Originally Posted by LiveNupe
I think that question was relevant when the car was first introduced and the 40th cars were actually selling for 25-30k more than non-40th cars. I don't think anyone, even the guy who started this thread, contends that the 40th is worth 30k more than a non-40th.
My take on the subject is.... I bought my car roughly the for the same price of a non-40th car so I'd expect to sell it for roughly the same price as a non-40th car. At the same asking price, I'd hope my car would be more desirable than a non-40th car and sell quicker. But I don't look at it as a collector's item any more than the targas, Titanium edition Cayennes, custom painted turquoise blue Boxsters, etc. One could make a valid argument that all of these models were limitied production, but not models that command a significant premium.... unless you have commemmorative luggage to go with it.
My take on the subject is.... I bought my car roughly the for the same price of a non-40th car so I'd expect to sell it for roughly the same price as a non-40th car. At the same asking price, I'd hope my car would be more desirable than a non-40th car and sell quicker. But I don't look at it as a collector's item any more than the targas, Titanium edition Cayennes, custom painted turquoise blue Boxsters, etc. One could make a valid argument that all of these models were limitied production, but not models that command a significant premium.... unless you have commemmorative luggage to go with it.
#36
Rennlist Member
You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by LiveNupe
You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
#39
Burning Brakes
Oh, I've overseen one detail of the add: "Porsche Leather Crest Keychain". I've to revise my estimate. I think his car is worth more than $70K and he posted back in Jan, so that's 3 months less depreciation on the car when he did ask $65K.
#41
Three Wheelin'
As a reference point at the end of 2005 I bought a brand new leftover 2004 with 24 miles on the clock at delivery for 60. granted it is a base C3, but it is very well optioned and was brand new. I love the 40th Anniversary and would have bought one when I was looking, but couldn't seem to find one in the right price range at the time. I do think this one is way over priced at 65k unfortunately, but I do hope you get that much for it!
#42
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by LiveNupe
You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
#43
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by triode
it's just not special enough to justify the price. 997Ss are superior in every way so why would anyone pick this one over it for $65K? for the looks.... not different enough. performance? still getting handed by the 997S. interior? looks avg.
#44
the only person who will pay $65k is a collector type. assuming that guy doesn't come along, i think most people would opt for a cheaper yet comparable 996 or 997 which are becoming more common in the mid-$60ks today, including S's and with CPO.
#45
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by Ray S
You haven't seen the "Disreagard" thread recently. It doesn't take much to start a topic and keep it going!
..reminds me that I need to find time to punch out some more photos.