Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

F/S 2004 911 C2 40th Anniversary Edition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2007, 02:22 PM
  #31  
rcronin
Advanced
 
rcronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You ever notice that sometimes a car being sold with modifications to it that the owner will try to get 100% of the mod costs back?!
I was looking for a 40th before I got what I have now. It had most of the things that this car here has minus the short shifter and K40 and it had less than 9K miles on it. Sale price $57K. I didn't act soon enough and it was gone.
Low mileage?! I love that term. Watch on ebay some cars that are selling and some that are not. The prices for an equally equipped machine in the same model year but with mileage different, on at 9k and the other at 25k, will be listed and sell at the same price.
Good luck with the sale either way. Nice looking toy.
Old 04-26-2007, 02:28 PM
  #32  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TD in DC
No it doesn't.

The GT3 and the 40th are not even aimed at the same market.

If you want a track oriented car that you can use on the street AND you do not need back seats, then the GT3 is the car for you.

If you want a street oriented car that you can use on the track, OR if you need back seats, then the 40th is an outstanding choice.

They are really aimed at two entirely different market segments.

This price may be too high, but comparing the price to a GT3 doesn't help make that argument in my opinion since they are not even really competing for the same potential buyers.

A much better comparison is with other 996 coupes. Specifically, is the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD worth 30K? That is the question . . .

Talking about resale value ($) Todd not track performance.

However, you comparo of a 996 with X51 and LSD is, I agree, the better route to go. But there is NOTHING wrong with comparing the two as I have. To say they are 2 differenet drivers isn't 100% the case. But for that price, like I (and others) have said, you are in Turbo territory and close to GT3 territory. The market the 40th might have been aimed at a specific buyer as you say it would be more representative of the Turbo crowd (fast blvd cruiser).
Old 04-26-2007, 02:30 PM
  #33  
LiveNupe
Rennlist Member
 
LiveNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,403
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TD in DC
Specifically, is the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD worth 30K? That is the question . . .
I think that question was relevant when the car was first introduced and the 40th cars were actually selling for 25-30k more than non-40th cars. I don't think anyone, even the guy who started this thread, contends that the 40th is worth 30k more than a non-40th at this point in time. IMHO, the question of whether or not the X51 package plus a turbo nose and LSD is worth 30K is moot. The relevant question is "How much is the X51 package and LSD worth today?" I'd guess the answer is in the range of $5k. The turbo nose is purely cosmetic and doesn't add much to the value of the car (similar to the unique color, polished wheels, face plate dial rings, etc.)

My take on the subject is.... I bought my car roughly the for the same price of a non-40th car so I'd expect to sell it for roughly the same price as a non-40th car. At the same (or $5k higher) asking price, I'd hope my car would be more desirable than a non-40th car and sell quicker. I don't see the car as a collector's item any more than targas, Titanium edition Cayennes, custom painted turquoise blue Boxsters, etc. One could make a valid argument that all of these models were limitied production, but not models that command a significant premium.... unless you have commemmorative luggage to go with it. With the luggage, you should be able to get an extra $10k.
Old 04-26-2007, 02:33 PM
  #34  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03Targa
Also, 1963 is a number of cars that will be a collectors item, but it will take at least 30years to get there.
So does that make my GT3 twice as rare since they made half as many???
Old 04-26-2007, 02:34 PM
  #35  
TD in DC
Race Director
 
TD in DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LiveNupe
I think that question was relevant when the car was first introduced and the 40th cars were actually selling for 25-30k more than non-40th cars. I don't think anyone, even the guy who started this thread, contends that the 40th is worth 30k more than a non-40th.

My take on the subject is.... I bought my car roughly the for the same price of a non-40th car so I'd expect to sell it for roughly the same price as a non-40th car. At the same asking price, I'd hope my car would be more desirable than a non-40th car and sell quicker. But I don't look at it as a collector's item any more than the targas, Titanium edition Cayennes, custom painted turquoise blue Boxsters, etc. One could make a valid argument that all of these models were limitied production, but not models that command a significant premium.... unless you have commemmorative luggage to go with it.
The 30K was in reference to this particular car and a comparison of the asking price with the typical asking price for a 996 C2 coupe.
Old 04-26-2007, 02:38 PM
  #36  
LiveNupe
Rennlist Member
 
LiveNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,403
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
Old 04-26-2007, 03:20 PM
  #37  
AndyK
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
AndyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 6,942
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LiveNupe
You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
I was just thinking that! Bet he sold the car for $65k and split!
Old 04-26-2007, 03:23 PM
  #38  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,190
Received 69 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyK
I was just thinking that! Bet he sold the car for $65k and split!
Bet not
Old 04-26-2007, 03:28 PM
  #39  
hwk72
Burning Brakes
 
hwk72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh, I've overseen one detail of the add: "Porsche Leather Crest Keychain". I've to revise my estimate. I think his car is worth more than $70K and he posted back in Jan, so that's 3 months less depreciation on the car when he did ask $65K.
Old 04-26-2007, 03:32 PM
  #40  
03Targa
Instructor
 
03Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LVDell
So does that make my GT3 twice as rare since they made half as many???
yes
Old 04-26-2007, 03:44 PM
  #41  
blk on blk
Three Wheelin'
 
blk on blk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, TEXAS!
Posts: 1,502
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

As a reference point at the end of 2005 I bought a brand new leftover 2004 with 24 miles on the clock at delivery for 60. granted it is a base C3, but it is very well optioned and was brand new. I love the 40th Anniversary and would have bought one when I was looking, but couldn't seem to find one in the right price range at the time. I do think this one is way over priced at 65k unfortunately, but I do hope you get that much for it!
Old 04-26-2007, 03:59 PM
  #42  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LiveNupe
You know what's interesting about this thread???? The guy who started it hasn't posted since January 27. We're expressing more concern about his car's value than he is. Hmmmmm......
You haven't seen the "Disreagard" thread recently. It doesn't take much to start a topic and keep it going!
Old 04-26-2007, 04:17 PM
  #43  
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
 
jumper5836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: great white north
Posts: 8,531
Received 72 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by triode
it's just not special enough to justify the price. 997Ss are superior in every way so why would anyone pick this one over it for $65K? for the looks.... not different enough. performance? still getting handed by the 997S. interior? looks avg.
The 40th is faster then a stock 997S, it lighter and has nicer head lights and front bumper.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:25 PM
  #44  
Nine9Sixer
Pro
 
Nine9Sixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC & CT
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the only person who will pay $65k is a collector type. assuming that guy doesn't come along, i think most people would opt for a cheaper yet comparable 996 or 997 which are becoming more common in the mid-$60ks today, including S's and with CPO.
Old 04-26-2007, 04:43 PM
  #45  
Wellardmac
Nordschleife Master
 
Wellardmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,279
Received 135 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray S
You haven't seen the "Disreagard" thread recently. It doesn't take much to start a topic and keep it going!

..reminds me that I need to find time to punch out some more photos.


Quick Reply: F/S 2004 911 C2 40th Anniversary Edition



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:55 PM.