Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Motor oil facts and real data.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2006, 12:08 PM
  #1  
bgiere
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
bgiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: in a racecar somewhere...
Posts: 3,368
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Motor oil facts and real data.

Here are some articles I've found helpful in dispelling some of the myths on motor oils. There are few opinions here. Well written and informative.

http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/
Old 10-03-2006, 02:50 PM
  #2  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thx - excellent write up!
Old 10-03-2006, 03:18 PM
  #3  
nycebo
Three Wheelin'
 
nycebo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,806
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Yes, thanks. It's a very informative write-up. It seems there's a reason at Porsche went to 0W-40 motor oil. Perhaps the startup process is a lot more catabolic than many of us theorized.

In particular, this link from the web site suggested above is very relevant to recent discussion and definitely explains why I am going back to 0W-40 this winter and sticking with it from then on.

Last edited by nycebo; 10-03-2006 at 03:43 PM.
Old 10-03-2006, 05:34 PM
  #4  
Ray S
Ironman 140.6
Rennlist Member
 
Ray S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 13,794
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

This info would seem to contradict those who think that a heavier oil should be used to maintain good oil pressure.
Old 10-03-2006, 06:07 PM
  #5  
Russ Murphy
Drifting
 
Russ Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the link. Very insightful. I'm pretty sure that my 996 is generating well over 4.5 bar at redline at the track which would also indicate that 0W-40 is more than adequate for that usage.
Old 10-03-2006, 06:59 PM
  #6  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

As a research scientist I have to throw my $.02 in as more of an a priori defense of this information. There will be soon enough people that chime in about how 15W-50 is better than 0W-40 and you risk this and that if you use the "water" of 0W-40 a the rec'd of the almighty advertising machine. They will also tell you that the manual USED to state at the rec'd of PAG/PCNA to use the 15W-50. Here is where ignorance to one key word puts them down the path of 15W-50......EMPIRICISM.

For me, I will take the empirical evidence that has been documented regarding 0W-40 and continue to use that for my choice fill. Only when I ran track days back in Vegas in 110-120 degree heat did I use 50 weight oil to protect form the higher temps. Other than that, 0W-40 is a great oil for 99% of all P-Car owner running the M96 engines.

Old 10-03-2006, 07:19 PM
  #7  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,185
Received 67 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

EMPIRICISM?

Yea...whatever he said
Old 10-03-2006, 07:30 PM
  #8  
LVDell
Nordschleife Master
 
LVDell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tobacco Road, NC
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Sorry, I should have defined it.

Epiricism is a basic tenet of scientific research that states the research is based on OBJECTIVE observation. Further, anything (for example oil research) propsed like the 0w-40 is better now for the M96 than 15W-50 should be supported with empirical evidence (and it is). When research is backed by empirical research the credibility is strengthened.

One word of caution though. There may be research in the near future that shows that 0W-40 was a not so good choice (or rather something better exists). However, this needs to be supported with empirical data as we have right now supporting 0W-40.
Old 10-03-2006, 08:34 PM
  #9  
Steven C.
Rennlist Member
 
Steven C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,185
Received 67 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

And there you go. I thought the Empericals died off around 4 B.C. That shows what I know But I do use 0W-40.
Old 10-03-2006, 08:35 PM
  #10  
bgiere
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
bgiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: in a racecar somewhere...
Posts: 3,368
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I would like to point out that I never mentioned anything,positve or negative, about the choice of viscosity in this particular post...I'm just the messenger!

Porsches recommended oil is based on the best info and analysis they currently have...That is why you will see periodic TSB's which will supersede previous recommendations. A manual is printed at a static time and cannot possibly be expected to be current as technology and chemistry advances.
Old 10-03-2006, 08:45 PM
  #11  
cdodkin
Drifting
 
cdodkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Another Ex pat Brit in SoCal
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's interesting to see a similar 'discussion' opening up on the Land Rover Discovery forum - same sets of ideas being discussed, same mis-understandings, same assumptions - I posted the above link and it certainly gave everyone pause for thought.

Amazingly there are also a whole group there that won't even admit that synthetic is better than mineral oil!
Old 10-03-2006, 09:19 PM
  #12  
pecivil
Burning Brakes
 
pecivil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: York SC
Posts: 1,123
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I read the entire thing...and it would seem that 0W-30 would be preferrable to 0W-40??? based on the oil that thickens up overnight the least is the best.
Old 10-03-2006, 10:15 PM
  #13  
Doug Hillary
Burning Brakes
 
Doug Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Airlie Beach, Australia
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi,
pecivil - fortunately, Porsche have their own oil quality standards for Approval and official Listing.
A cornerstone of this is their minimum HTHS viscosity of 3.6cSt. Currently no ?w-30 lubricant is Listed as they do not meet this requirement

Regards
Old 10-04-2006, 12:25 AM
  #14  
Holger B
Race Car
 
Holger B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 3,945
Received 87 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Good info.

No commentary yet from the board oil expert?
Old 10-04-2006, 12:35 AM
  #15  
pecivil
Burning Brakes
 
pecivil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: York SC
Posts: 1,123
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

thanks Doug, that would not have been a good mistake to make. I am paranoid enough with the 3.4 going into my Boxster after reading the 996 forum. Hopefully my engine, being a 2001, will be ok.

**Gulp**


Quick Reply: Motor oil facts and real data.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:37 AM.