Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Porsche Regeneration Valve from Throttle Body for Fuel Vapor System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2022, 12:40 AM
  #1  
daltxhowie
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
daltxhowie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Porsche Regeneration Valve from Throttle Body for Fuel Vapor System

1999 996 coupe with 122K miles. P1124 and P1126 codes reappear after deleting and only driving a few miles. Car runs fine and no white smoke. I'm assuming that I have a throttle body leak somewhere. Thought it might be the valve that connects charcoal canister to throttle body. Attached a picture of the valve below.
My understanding is this valve would be closed at all times except when power is put to it. With a hand vacuum pump attached to either end of this valve, it will not hold vacuum. Should it hold vacuum? Could this be my problem? The vacuum bleeds off fairly rapidly. Thanks in advance for any help.

Old 10-27-2022, 01:42 AM
  #2  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,397
Received 4,803 Likes on 2,165 Posts
Default

Yes it should hold vacuum, but that "may" not be the source of your fault codes....( a small leak can be compensated for by the DME/fuel trims)...


You need to use a Durametric or PIWIS to get the TRA/RKAT values that are present AFTER the code is set ...also the MAF kg/h value....

A positive value of 0.36 means there is a lean condition ( possible vacuum leak) more than can adjusted for....

A negative value of -0.36 means there is a rich condition ( possible MAF sensor) more than can be adjusted for...

Codes P1124 P1126 are usually accompanied by negative -0.36 and is caused by a MAF Sensor that is dirty and sending a higher kg/h value than is expected..( should be about 15kg/h at warm idle A/C off)

The following users liked this post:
EVOMMM (10-27-2022)
Old 10-27-2022, 10:05 AM
  #3  
daltxhowie
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
daltxhowie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschetech3
Yes it should hold vacuum, but that "may" not be the source of your fault codes....( a small leak can be compensated for by the DME/fuel trims)...


You need to use a Durametric or PIWIS to get the TRA/RKAT values that are present AFTER the code is set ...also the MAF kg/h value....

A positive value of 0.36 means there is a lean condition ( possible vacuum leak) more than can adjusted for....

A negative value of -0.36 means there is a rich condition ( possible MAF sensor) more than can be adjusted for...

Codes P1124 P1126 are usually accompanied by negative -0.36 and is caused by a MAF Sensor that is dirty and sending a higher kg/h value than is expected..( should be about 15kg/h at warm idle A/C off)
Thanks for the response. I did originally change out my MAF after trying to clean it to no avail, but El cheapo here did replace with non-Bosch MAF. It does seem to be "working" to some degree based on my cheap Bluetooth scanner. But perhaps that's my problem. I'll try to post the MAF outputs that I am seeing. Thanks again.
Old 10-27-2022, 11:50 AM
  #4  
daltxhowie
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
daltxhowie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daltxhowie
Thanks for the response. I did originally change out my MAF after trying to clean it to no avail, but El cheapo here did replace with non-Bosch MAF. It does seem to be "working" to some degree based on my cheap Bluetooth scanner. But perhaps that's my problem. I'll try to post the MAF outputs that I am seeing. Thanks again.
I bought a TPI brand MAF part# MAF 1127 ($50 vs $160 for Bosch - current Rockauto prices). Could that be my problem?. I'm probably going to just go swap out for the Bosch model. Attached is a data recording from MAF which it looks to be averaging about 3.4 g/sec (~12.2 kg/hr). I believe the Gap in time on the chart is just a flaw in data recording with my app.

Old 10-27-2022, 01:55 PM
  #5  
DBJoe996
Rennlist Member
 
DBJoe996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 1,198 Likes on 767 Posts
Default

Our engines are particularly sensitive to the MAF sensor. Basically everything running depends on the MAF sensor, so don't go "el cheapo". I recommend the OE Porsche MAF sensor. Yes, it is expensive but worth it.
Old 10-27-2022, 03:52 PM
  #6  
daltxhowie
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
daltxhowie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DBJoe996
Our engines are particularly sensitive to the MAF sensor. Basically everything running depends on the MAF sensor, so don't go "el cheapo". I recommend the OE Porsche MAF sensor. Yes, it is expensive but worth it.
Thanks DBJoe.



Quick Reply: Porsche Regeneration Valve from Throttle Body for Fuel Vapor System



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:02 PM.