Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pricing Help Needed From the Experts (you guys)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2016, 09:01 PM
  #46  
clib
Rennlist Member
 
clib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 697
Received 118 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

re reading the original post and all the followups i will just throw out there to consider 964 before they go crazy price wise. While not a 993 some actually prefer them driving wise and looks wise. A buddy of mine has a 2 owner car with all records c4 with under 80k miles and he will maybe get 40-45 for it. Driving it back to back with mine i cant say mine is more fun to drive or look at. You could get a well maintained one for a lot less and would most certainly gain value.
Unfortunately the 993 appears to now be in a position where 'collectors' have driven prices way beyond what they are worth. You face buying an underused garage queen you will have paid too much to have fun in or use put of fear of harming your investment, or a very high mileage example that will start to cost you a fair bit if you use it much and wont go up further (as my engine sits in a shop somewhere having its top end redone for oil consumption). As i said earlier i am glad i got mine back in 04. As someone who prefers driving to collecting i couldnt do it today.
Old 04-04-2016, 10:27 PM
  #47  
gonzilla
Rennlist Member
 
gonzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 3,995
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clib
re reading the original post and all the followups i will just throw out there to consider 964 before they go crazy price wise.
Too late! Lately, apples-to-apples, it seems like 964s are going for more than 993s.
Old 04-05-2016, 12:53 AM
  #48  
Bloose993TT
Three Wheelin'
 
Bloose993TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,703
Received 129 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Run Forest Run! Plenty of great cars out there. Just take your time. Stay away from these bad rep dealers.
Old 04-05-2016, 03:16 PM
  #49  
Johnny_law
Pro
 
Johnny_law's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnireland
The price, even if the car was perfect, is way way too high. It is a 20 year old car and with those absurdly low miles that means 20 years of stuff that needs work. The entire suspension is probably turned into petrified wood. Once you start driving the bushings are going to fall apart, the shocks will start to leak, etc. Gaskets seals are dry from lack of use...they have become brittle with age and when you start driving and they get wet again, they can start to crumble and leak. Electrical components may have built up corrosion over time and can show resistance when they start to get used. Window regulators, the sunroof motor and cables, the mirror motors, the struts that hold up the frunk and the engine hood will likely begin to fail (especially if original) and they have not been used often. The alternator and starter motor (if original) could also fail if they suddenly experience a lot more exercise than they are used to over the last 20 years. Oh yes, don't forget the wheel bearings. Like old tires, they can develop flat spots. This is a car for someone who wants to park it and look at it for a year or so, and then hope to flip it for a small profit. Find a car that has been well driven and well maintained and for under $50k...maybe closer to $45k.
Wow, if I only knew before I bought my 16K mile 97 turbo 3 years ago. Wait, I haven't had any problems with seals etc... I don't think my car seals are not crumbling I still have no leaks and car runs like it came off the show room. It still is low mileage just under 21K but she is driven and loved.

This statement by John Ireland is fear speech IMO.

Don't let low mileage keep you from purchasing your perfect car. Just be sure to have a PPI by a trusted, informed individual (This is true about any car you get). And enjoy your purchase in good health.
Old 04-06-2016, 01:57 AM
  #50  
johnireland
Rennlist Member
 
johnireland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

No fear speech...just saying that after 20 years stuff wears out and breaks. The car is a mechanical devise that likes to be kept in motion. Not using it can be harder on parts than using it. I'd rather have a high mileage car that has been well maintained than a garage queen doesn't get driven and as a result doesn't get serviced. The 993 is one of the best daily drivers anyone could ask for, sadly the speculators are making them harder to acquire at a logical price...and that is sending a lot of them to the garage instead of the road.
Old 04-06-2016, 02:09 AM
  #51  
johnireland
Rennlist Member
 
johnireland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by six gun
You paint a very drab picture of a low mileage car, I trust that you have seen this car, if not you do a dis-service any one that has a low mileage car and maintains properly.
Are we talking collector cars or drivers? I've seen lots of low mile cars (of all makes) and unless they are owned by a museum that keeps refreshing them, they all suffer from lack of use. Years ago I bought my Ferrari, a 308 GTSi, with 88k miles on it. All the Ferrari owners I ran into had heart attacks over the milage. However I had fewer oil leaks and belt issues than they did because drove my car every day. Sold it three years later with 124k on the odometers...ran perfectly, no mechanical failures.

Seems the guys with all the low mileage cars had all the problems.
Old 04-06-2016, 05:13 PM
  #52  
six gun
Rennlist Member
 
six gun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by johnireland
Are we talking collector cars or drivers? I've seen lots of low mile cars (of all makes) and unless they are owned by a museum that keeps refreshing them, they all suffer from lack of use. Years ago I bought my Ferrari, a 308 GTSi, with 88k miles on it. All the Ferrari owners I ran into had heart attacks over the milage. However I had fewer oil leaks and belt issues than they did because drove my car every day. Sold it three years later with 124k on the odometers...ran perfectly, no mechanical failures.

Seems the guys with all the low mileage cars had all the problems.
John' you are the only one on here that mentioned "collector car" 18K is low mileage but not a museum piece. At 18K that car could have been driven over 900 miles a year, more than enough to keep it tight.
Old 04-06-2016, 06:08 PM
  #53  
INTMD8
Rennlist Member
 
INTMD8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lake Villa IL
Posts: 769
Received 266 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnireland
Are we talking collector cars or drivers? I've seen lots of low mile cars (of all makes) and unless they are owned by a museum that keeps refreshing them, they all suffer from lack of use. Years ago I bought my Ferrari, a 308 GTSi, with 88k miles on it. All the Ferrari owners I ran into had heart attacks over the milage. However I had fewer oil leaks and belt issues than they did because drove my car every day. Sold it three years later with 124k on the odometers...ran perfectly, no mechanical failures.

Seems the guys with all the low mileage cars had all the problems.
Over time a car can be maintained correctly or not but that doesn't have any correlation to the odometer reading.

My 993 purchased with 111k has been great, so has my F355 purchased with 11k.
Old 04-07-2016, 02:38 AM
  #54  
Dick in TN
Racer
 
Dick in TN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 345
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Glad to see members comments challenging the misinformation about low mileage cars. And I don't own one, mine has 56K.
Old 04-07-2016, 05:09 PM
  #55  
dlb
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
dlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Checking out some cars - thoughts

Guys - This info has been amazingly useful. I'm still considering the C2 with 17K, I am also now planning to take a look at a C4S, with 60k miles. That car is closing on 90k though. Seems well optioned and has very solid records. To throw in one other curve ball I am also going to take a 964 C2, lower price point, around $55k.

Somewhat vague question, but....does one of these feel like a better buy than the others. I am not looking for an investment, but a car that I can drive the sh*t out of, and give to my boy one day.

993 C4S is rarer apparently ($90K)
993 C2 has low miles ($75K)
964 C2....well, it's a 964, which is cool ($55/60K)

All cars will get a PPI from a air cooled guy recommended by a pal...not the dealers.

Thanks guys
Old 04-07-2016, 06:46 PM
  #56  
u7t2p7
Banned
 
u7t2p7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,579
Received 51 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dlb
Guys - This info has been amazingly useful. I'm still considering the C2 with 17K, I am also now planning to take a look at a C4S, with 60k miles. That car is closing on 90k though. Seems well optioned and has very solid records. To throw in one other curve ball I am also going to take a 964 C2, lower price point, around $55k.

Somewhat vague question, but....does one of these feel like a better buy than the others. I am not looking for an investment, but a car that I can drive the sh*t out of, and give to my boy one day.

993 C4S is rarer apparently ($90K)
993 C2 has low miles ($75K)
964 C2....well, it's a 964, which is cool ($55/60K)
The C4S sounds overpriced to me
The 993 C2 (if it's the Luxsport one) I would pass
The 964 C2; what is MY, miles, condition, etc. If the miles are sub 50k the 964 is the best value of the three and will easily hold its own regarding appreciation compared to the 993's. Question, have you posted a WTB thread; no RLers out there willing to part with their car?
Old 04-07-2016, 06:55 PM
  #57  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dlb
I am not looking for an investment, but a car that I can drive the sh*t out of, and give to my boy one day.

993 C4S is rarer apparently ($90K)
993 C2 has low miles ($75K)
964 C2....well, it's a 964, which is cool ($55/60K)
Define "drive the sh*t out of". If your going to put just 2-3K miles per year on the car, the C2's value is going to more effected than a higher mileage car.

At some point in time, let's say in 20 years, the car will be around 40 years old, and condition will be more important than mileage (although if the car has under 20K miles AND excellent condition it will be worth a lot more.)
Old 04-07-2016, 07:15 PM
  #58  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by u7t2p7
The C4S sounds overpriced to me
The 993 C2 (if it's the Luxsport one) I would pass
The 964 C2; what is MY, miles, condition, etc. If the miles are sub 50k the 964 is the best value of the three and will easily hold its own regarding appreciation compared to the 993's. Question, have you posted a WTB thread; no RLers out there willing to part with their car?
Honestly I think you need a lot information about all of the cars to really close in on pricing.

A 1994 964 C2 at 55k is not a deal, Hagerty has a #1 car at 45K and all conditions are trending flat.

A 1996 993 C2 #1 is at 90K, all conditions are trending flat.

A 1996 C4S #1 is at 150K and climbing. #2 at 112K and trending up. #3/4 cars are slightly trending up.
Old 04-07-2016, 07:27 PM
  #59  
Bloose993TT
Three Wheelin'
 
Bloose993TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,703
Received 129 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by il pirata
Honestly I think you need a lot information about all of the cars to really close in on pricing.

A 1994 964 C2 at 55k is not a deal, Hagerty has a #1 car at 45K and all conditions are trending flat.

A 1996 993 C2 #1 is at 90K, all conditions are trending flat.

A 1996 C4S #1 is at 150K and climbing. #2 at 112K and trending up. #3/4 cars are slightly trending up.
If you can find a Condition #1 1994 C2 Coupe (5spd) at $55k run and buy it! Hagerty is all over the place on their values. It's pretty evident they don't have their pulse on the 964 market.
Old 04-07-2016, 07:56 PM
  #60  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Todynot
I'd say it's priced at the top end of the price range for a car as described. Looks like a Lux Sport photo shoot.
^^^My thoughts are the same Re; top of the price range.


Quick Reply: Pricing Help Needed From the Experts (you guys)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:17 AM.