Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Oil leak - advice please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2012, 08:10 PM
  #16  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,364
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

first leak looks like cam carrier to head - typical. Requires quite a bit of work to solve, good thing is you do not need to remove the heads, bad thing is its remove almost everything to the heads. There is no gasket there, its a liquid sealer, and it looks like it's failing.

You are right, heavy corrosion on the return tubes - see if you can clean them up with emery paper and even put a heat resistant paint on them. If you want to replace them so they are shiny new again, you can do it if you are fixing issue #1 (BTW, you do not have to remove the heads to replace them, just the cam carriers), or just cut them out and replace them with the two part units - they will work fine.

Third picture is a bit weird - why is the oil residue green? Did you try to put a solvent on it?

Nothing looks critical and need attention in order to drive the car.

cheers,

Mike
Old 11-12-2012, 08:27 PM
  #17  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have used the two piece oil return tubes on a race motor and had zero issues. Be careful while installing them. Drain the oil out of the case and the tubes take about 90mins to replace taking your time. The ones in the pictures are pretty rusty. Definitely agree with Mike about the cam tower leak.
Old 11-12-2012, 08:35 PM
  #18  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,522
Received 81 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I'd argue with you Mike, on the cam tower vs head removal. If I'm going to remove cam towers to reseal, I'm pulling the heads and getting them rebuilt, which is why I suggested head removal, if one wants to go that far on a used motor. Popping the heads off after cam towers are off is a walk in the park.

After I rebuilt my 3.2, I had a piddly drip over 3. The only way I could justify to myself taking the time to tear that far down again, was to pop the heads off and slap some Mahle high compression 3.4L p's and c's.
Old 11-12-2012, 08:40 PM
  #19  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,364
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
I'd argue with you Mike, on the cam tower vs head removal. If I'm going to remove cam towers to reseal, I'm pulling the heads and getting them rebuilt, which is why I said one piece tubes require head removal.
Yeah, but i was focused on just getting the oil leak fixed. I can tear down to the heads and put it all back together quite quickly, but once I break that head/cylinder seal, it's another can of worms - now its valve guides, possible head resurfacing and machining work, O ring base seals, oil return seal.... then I start to look at the rings -> but if I keep it just to fix the oil leak, and perhaps do some minor maintenance like replace the lifters, its much quicker and cheaper. Just trying to keep it to fixing the OP problems...

Cheers,

Mike
Old 11-12-2012, 09:08 PM
  #20  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Mike,

Why not suggest a leak down prior to any work so at least you know where it may lead....... It's funny how the projects grow and grow...
Old 11-12-2012, 09:22 PM
  #21  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,522
Received 81 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike J
Yeah, but i was focused on just getting the oil leak fixed. I can tear down to the heads and put it all back together quite quickly, but once I break that head/cylinder seal, it's another can of worms - now its valve guides, possible head resurfacing and machining work, O ring base seals, oil return seal.... then I start to look at the rings -> but if I keep it just to fix the oil leak, and perhaps do some minor maintenance like replace the lifters, its much quicker and cheaper. Just trying to keep it to fixing the OP problems...

Cheers,

Mike
But that's the point-he's asking if he needs a topend, which obviously he doesn't for a leak. But that leads me to assume he's got more than a few miles on this car, if he had such a concern, and it would be silly to not at least do the heads if tearing down that far, only IMO. But, then again, I found a way to drop $18K into my 3.2, using my labor.
Old 11-12-2012, 09:36 PM
  #22  
bobt993
Rennlist Member
 
bobt993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 3,077
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

^^^^ Ed, I have my 3.8 apart to make some changes right now so if I am not focused this could wander in a painful direction. I did not like the variety of torque on the cam tower bolts I removed so now the case is split and I am checking everything including the balance on the crank etc.

Back to the OP. I would check as much as possible if your going to pull the engine and take it down to a short block. Not much more time to get it further, but as Mike indicates the costs on re-assembly go up quickly once you get any deeper.
Old 11-13-2012, 06:58 AM
  #23  
Paul902
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Paul902's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
But that's the point-he's asking if he needs a topend, which obviously he doesn't for a leak. But that leads me to assume he's got more than a few miles on this car, if he had such a concern, and it would be silly to not at least do the heads if tearing down that far, only IMO. But, then again, I found a way to drop $18K into my 3.2, using my labor.
I think I know less than you assume...So, are you guys referring to the cylinders as the heads, and what I thought was the head as the cam tower? I did think that where the oil is leaking from might be a sign for a top end. my bad. The car has 140k km on it, btw.

From looking at all the inputs it seems that I should:
a) check for the VRAM flap leak that Keith linked to.
b) clean up or replace the oil return tubes, but no urgency to do so. One piece if I do the cam tower work, two piece if I do not.
c) either live with the cam tower leak, or have the engine dropped out and do a leakdown, and depending on the results just remove the cam tower for resealing, or do a top end.

Another thought was to check the torque of the cam tower bolts.

Sound about right?

Thanks IXLR8 for posting my pics!
Old 11-13-2012, 09:23 AM
  #24  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I am not sure what the fuss is all about on this thread. That cam housing leak is totally insignificant. It might be the cutest, most adorable little cam housing leak I've ever seen.

The upper leak is probably from the varioram actuator seal on the underside of the intake manifold -- a $10 part and an hour or two of labor.
Old 11-13-2012, 10:51 AM
  #25  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,708
Received 1,444 Likes on 836 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul902
I think I know less than you assume...So, are you guys referring to the cylinders as the heads, and what I thought was the head as the cam tower? I did think that where the oil is leaking from might be a sign for a top end. my bad. The car has 140k km on it, btw.

From looking at all the inputs it seems that I should:
a) check for the VRAM flap leak that Keith linked to.
b) clean up or replace the oil return tubes, but no urgency to do so. One piece if I do the cam tower work, two piece if I do not.
c) either live with the cam tower leak, or have the engine dropped out and do a leakdown, and depending on the results just remove the cam tower for resealing, or do a top end.

Another thought was to check the torque of the cam tower bolts.

Sound about right?

Thanks IXLR8 for posting my pics!
Paul, these motors have far more parts than a traditional block'ed motor.

heres the story:

The crankcase is two pieces and holds only the crank, intermediate shaft, and oil pump. The cylinders are separate pieces (with all the fins) that slide into the crank case. The heads then go on top. But unlike other cars, the heads contain only the valves and springs, not the cams. On top of the heads is the cam tower into which you stuff the cams, rockers, lifters, etc.. Then the valve covers go over the whole mess.

so to pull the towers, you'd still need to mess with the valve timing, but you wouldn't have to pull the heads off.

As NP said, I'd leave it be, but monitor for it getting worse. My car has a few little weeps, including one from the cylinder to case, but I'm not about to tear it apart over that.


this is a good link for pics

http://www.pcarworkshop.com/index.ph...cylinders_back
Old 11-13-2012, 12:36 PM
  #26  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,364
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NP993
I am not sure what the fuss is all about on this thread. That cam housing leak is totally insignificant. It might be the cutest, most adorable little cam housing leak I've ever seen.
No fuss intended and I note that there is no reason to fix any of it - we are just spending some time explaining what we think the source of the leak is, and how to get at it ... you are right I would not go to all that trouble for that sized leak, even if my labor is free...
Old 11-13-2012, 02:06 PM
  #27  
Garth S
Rennlist Member
 
Garth S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,210
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Hi Paul,
That leak appears to be from an unpressurized source vs an oil gallery - at least, that's my assumption: a nick to one's little finger is a long way from the heart, so the patient is at very low risk from the aggravation. I would treat that leak in the same vein ( pardon the pun), and basically ignore it. The best synthetic at $10/l will cover a lot of drips vs the teardown costs ....average drop = 0.05ml = 20K drops/l ). So, what's the drop rate per day ?

Just for amusement, here's the shade tree approach I had taken for a somewhat analogous transmission leak ...
Old 11-13-2012, 08:50 PM
  #28  
Paul902
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Paul902's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Quadcammer...thanks! That was exactly the tutorial I needed to understand what y'all are saying.

NP993...stress-relieving, thank you.

GarthS...your transmission patch still holding? I would say I get a few drops on the floor every time I park, and there was a heavy grime behind the rear bumper. Agreed that at this point it is most cost effective to ignore, assuming it is not going to massively self destruct at some point.


Is the cam tower bolt retorque a good idea? I notice Bob said his had a variation from one to another. I was suprised to see these are only 23 Nm. My VW head bolts were, like, 200Nm. I was suprised the cam tower torque was not in this range. Can anyone explain that to me? Is it that the heads have separate bolts that are tighter, so the cam tower doesn't need it?
Old 11-13-2012, 09:04 PM
  #29  
MarkD
Rennlist Member
 
MarkD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Still here...
Posts: 6,962
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul902
I was suprised the cam tower torque was not in this range. Can anyone explain that to me? Is it that the heads have separate bolts that are tighter, so the cam tower doesn't need it?
Bingo!

You understand more than you think you understand sir
Old 11-13-2012, 09:16 PM
  #30  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,533
Received 705 Likes on 489 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul902
I was surprised to see these are only 23 Nm. My VW head bolts were, like, 200Nm. I was surprised the cam tower torque was not in this range. Can anyone explain that to me?
The cam towers are just a casting that hold the cams, rocker shafts/rockers and valve covers...no pressures involved. Whereas a cylinder head is another matter.

Paul, have a look at this thread and go through all the pages. It shows some very good shots of an engine being taken apart.


Originally Posted by Paul902
Is it that the heads have separate bolts that are tighter, so the cam tower doesn't need it?
Nuts.


Quick Reply: Oil leak - advice please



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:26 PM.