Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Should I pull the trigger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2012, 05:48 PM
  #31  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Leakdown test won't tell you a thing about valve guide wear, unless the guides are **really** worn. Only easy way to get a read on guide wear is to know the rate of oil consumption...

Leakdown tests how effectively the combustion chamber is sealed at TDC -- i.e., it measures wear on piston rings and valve seats, not wear on valve guides, which needless to say are not in the combustion chamber.
Old 10-15-2012, 05:54 PM
  #32  
FabianS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FabianS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada.
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Owner says the car uses almost no oil at all, and only emits a tiny bit of smoke on spring start up after sitting all winter.
Old 10-15-2012, 06:02 PM
  #33  
boman993
Drifting
 
boman993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,677
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Fabian, judging from everything you wrote so far, if the car passes the PPI with
compression test, at $26K, it sounds like a great car! I'd wait for the PPI results
to be 100% sure and PULL THAT TRIGGER!

Old 10-15-2012, 06:04 PM
  #34  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boman993
Fabian, judging from everything you wrote so far, if the car passes the PPI with compression test, at $26K, it sounds like a great car! I'd wait for the PPI results to be 100% sure and PULL THAT TRIGGER!

Agree. If compression test is healthy, and you trust the owner that it's not an oil guzzler, sounds like a good deal.
Old 10-15-2012, 07:29 PM
  #35  
FabianS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FabianS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada.
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. I just don't want to make a bad decision buying a 993, seeing as I could afford a new Scion FR-S or very lightly used 370Z for the same amount. I just want a fun, reliable car, and the 993 has always been my dream car since high school.
Old 10-15-2012, 07:56 PM
  #36  
RS man
Rennlist Member
 
RS man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Don't forget these cars are getting on in years and if something goes wrong it will still be $$$ so you may wish to reconsider if you are unwilling to plough money into the car if something goes wrong.
Old 10-15-2012, 07:59 PM
  #37  
doberdog
 
doberdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver,BC
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

A new FR-S under warranty might be a better daily driver for three months of the year but this is a not a daily driver, so if it checks out I say go for it. Pull the trigger.
Old 10-15-2012, 07:59 PM
  #38  
FabianS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FabianS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada.
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To some extent yes, as I was spending a bunch of $ on modifying my Tacoma until just reciently. If it's gonna be like $5000 a year to drive it 5000 kms a year in the summer, then we'll have a problem, as the Wife will kill me.
Old 10-15-2012, 08:23 PM
  #39  
Tango Foxtrot
Instructor
 
Tango Foxtrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Have you thought about a 3.2 Carrera or SC? Tons of fun and half the purchase price of a 993.
Old 10-15-2012, 08:34 PM
  #40  
FabianS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FabianS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada.
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are nice, but just too old for me. Plus they still go for around $20,000 up around here for a nice one.
Old 10-16-2012, 01:43 AM
  #41  
inkatouring
Three Wheelin'
 
inkatouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: nowhere, but at least I'm getting there fast!
Posts: 1,382
Received 59 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FabianS
Owner says the car uses almost no oil at all, and only emits a tiny bit of smoke on spring start up after sitting all winter.
That can be misleading, even if he is being honest. Oil consumption varies depending on how the car is being driven. When I drove my cab on the highway, zero oil consumption; but in true city, stop light driving it was as low as quart every 300 miles. Needless to say, car needed guides. Gotta check the inside of the exhaust manifold for burnt oil....

But, as race911 has pointed out in prior threads, valve guides wear from the first time the car is put in use. The issue really is what you're willing to put up with. Since you're looking at a 95 -- OBD I car -- even if you have "bad" guides, the car will not throw a check engine light, making the main question if there is excessive oil consumption.

Last edited by inkatouring; 10-16-2012 at 02:11 AM.
Old 10-16-2012, 03:55 AM
  #42  
briefescape
Rennlist Member
 
briefescape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FabianS
A clutch would not be my worry, it's the possible $8-10,000 top end rebuild. All of the local shops said that by 180-200,000kms I would be looking at a top end job, and lowest price quoted was $8000.
180k -200k km = 112k - 125k miles " needing " a top end rebuild is such a fallacy .
This 993 of mine has over 140k miles and may burn 1/4 litre of oil every 3000 miles .
Old 10-16-2012, 06:35 PM
  #43  
FabianS
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FabianS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada.
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guess I should also mention this car is due for it's 90k mile service, which I read is a couple grand, yes?
Old 10-16-2012, 07:43 PM
  #44  
tangram
Racer
 
tangram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have a '95 C2 for sale (in Toronto) but I am doing so with a heavy heart. I had the top end rebuilt a couple of years ago due to one bad cylinder (fortunately clutch was in great shape) and upgraded the suspension to PSS-9. The car has 140,000km on it. IMHO, it runs like new. I've owned the car for 10 years. These cars are not the sort of thing you buy one year and sell the next. You have to find THE CAR that touches your emotions and then accept that you will need to nurture your "baby". These are not cheap cars to maintain but they will reward you every time you get behind the wheel. Good luck with your purchase!
Old 10-16-2012, 07:54 PM
  #45  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by inkatouring
But, as race911 has pointed out in prior threads, valve guides wear from the first time the car is put in use. The issue really is what you're willing to put up with.
Originally Posted by briefescape
180k -200k km = 112k - 125k miles " needing " a top end rebuild is such a fallacy .
This 993 of mine has over 140k miles and may burn 1/4 litre of oil every 3000 miles .
Not to start another epic valve guide thread....but the basic deal is this: quality control for valve guide fitment was terrible at the factory. Some cars rolled off the line with good fitment, and those are the ones that don't need top ends at sub-100K miles, and don't burn oil, or burn very little oil. The rest...well, many of them were burning oil at a high rate right off the showroom floor. These are the cars that needed top end rebuilds at 60K, 70K, etc miles. Bottom line: it's a crapshoot, and the only way to know is to know how much oil the car is burning per X number of miles.


Quick Reply: Should I pull the trigger?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:13 PM.