Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2012 Porsche 911 - even LARGER than the 996/997

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2011, 11:59 AM
  #16  
Ed Burdell
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Burdell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That F-150 comparison is spot on. The other day I parked my '97-vintage truck beside a new version, and mine was tiny! I already feel like I'm driving a battleship when I'm in mine - the new one must feel like a semi.
Old 03-05-2011, 11:59 AM
  #17  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,471
Received 684 Likes on 477 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by curve lover
These?
Nope, but they are close.
Old 03-05-2011, 02:36 PM
  #18  
Amfab
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Amfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Isn't this more about crash worthiness and trying to meet impact standards than it is about just making something bigger to be bigger?
Old 03-05-2011, 03:00 PM
  #19  
RollingArt
Drifting
 
RollingArt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Makmov
They do it for racing because the GT cars have to be based off a production car, so even the 997 was getting wider as the years wore on.
Wrong answer!

Originally Posted by Amfab
Isn't this more about crash worthiness and trying to meet impact standards than it is about just making something bigger to be bigger?
I've heard it has more to do with passing the new gas mileage requirements.

Larger vehicles are allowed a lower mpg rating than say, the current 997.





Phil
Old 03-05-2011, 11:22 PM
  #20  
Makmov
Drifting
 
Makmov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RollingArt
Wrong answer!



I've heard it has more to do with passing the new gas mileage requirements.

Larger vehicles are allowed a lower mpg rating than say, the current 997.





Phil
That was what Porsche Factory driver Patrick Long said, and talked about the new car at some length, why, and how it related to the GT cars. The old car is quite a bit narrower than what they consider their main rival Ferrari, and thought they needed that edge.

Fuel economy usually goes by class, the 991 is not in a new class of car, It is still a sub compact, then by weight, the new 991 is lighter. Furthermore it is figured the aggragate average of all there cars, so changing on model isn't large effect on there X number.
Old 03-06-2011, 10:39 AM
  #21  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,667
Received 1,403 Likes on 812 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Full Boost
What?

997 lighter than 993?

Really?
It may not be lighter than a 2wd narrowbody 993, but its very close.

993 comes in at about 3070, 997 is about 3130.

so within 60lbs ain't bad.
Old 03-06-2011, 10:56 AM
  #22  
shadow993
Drifting
 
shadow993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 2,287
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by curve lover
Great placement.... LOL.
Old 03-06-2011, 10:58 AM
  #23  
shadow993
Drifting
 
shadow993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 2,287
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I heard it had to do with handling and creating a longer wheelbase.
Old 03-06-2011, 11:23 AM
  #24  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Even race cars have a cup holder or two.

http://www.pegasusautoracing.com/pro...asp?RecId=5322




Quick Reply: 2012 Porsche 911 - even LARGER than the 996/997



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:41 AM.