scott watkins

a 766 mile 1970 911S.

http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...ad.php?t=11193

lumpy

Wow! Thanks for posting, its a real time capsule.

timothymoffat

Cool car. Awesome website (just what I needed!).

TMc993

I saw that article, but these photos are much more telling...Anyone noticed the cracked and apparently dry-rotted rubber bushing in the 10th photo? Wonder how many items like that will have to be replaced?

bart1

I preferred the 800K mile 911 in there a few issues back.

"...meant to be driven..."

texas911

Yea low mileage 911 are a rip off for sure.

bluejam

I must agree, a real low mileage 911 saddens me :-(
Unless it's the 997 Turbo I sat in at Sunset the other day. Mmmmmmm.
But I can't afford it, so it saddens me too. Scheize!

2Many Cars

I guess I miss the point of a car like that. Relatively high production, you can't drive it, it's not safe to drive anyway without some resto, has minor defects like cracked turn signal lens (photo 4), and signs of some minor rust appearing. In hindsight the owner(s) should have taken lots of photos when it was new and then driven the snot out of it.