Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Springs and shock choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2007, 04:05 PM
  #16  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smddanny
...
I did measure the eibachs before installation. The static stack height was about the same and I found that the diameter of the wire and the coils were similar to M030 USA springs ... the number of turns and pitch was different so I don't think the spring rates were the same as the factory springs...
So if the static height was the same, yet they lower the car an inch or whatever, then that means that they have a lower spring rate than stock US M030. So pairing Eibachs with HD shocks would seem less than ideal, since HDs are meant for stiffer springs. Unless I'm missing something there.
Old 01-10-2007, 05:18 PM
  #17  
smddanny
Instructor
 
smddanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Othereric:

I dunno what ride height I would have had if I installed the eibachs with the oem shocks. As you pointed out earlier this wouldn't have been a grand idea. I was quick to throw the oem shocks away.. that act gave me great pleasure. The hds had an adjsutable perch height as you know and I am unsure of the relative perch height difference between the oem and the hds now. I am 2/3 of the way to rs ride height front and rear. This was dictated by the rear perches which are most of the way to full up... I do think the spring rate of the eibachs is higher than what than the oem M030 I just can't quantify.

Danny
96 993 tt
Old 01-10-2007, 05:24 PM
  #18  
Greg Fishman
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Greg Fishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 7,253
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jukelemon
I was a Pike. Chip was my big brother. We passed in the night probably a couple of times

Anyway, nice to meet up with you again.

I was at the reunion party a couple of summers ago-didn't see you there.
Unbelievable that rennlist could put two fraternity brothers in contact again. Amazing!
Old 01-10-2007, 05:27 PM
  #19  
Butzi
Rennlist Member
 
Butzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 636
Received 35 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Phi phi! To the Garnet & Gold!
Gamma Delta Chapter-now dead-(UofAZ).
Old 01-10-2007, 06:11 PM
  #20  
Jukelemon
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Jukelemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phi Phi back my friend. Kappa chapter.

I'll buzz you Greg. Take it easy.
Old 01-10-2007, 07:00 PM
  #21  
ChrisA
Advanced
 
ChrisA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought the ROW springs from 2 of 2 and added HD's. Completed the instal last week but just got the car on the road today as I also completed the SAI port clean. Suspension instal was easy and based on the limited driving till system settles in and required alignment, wow... What a difference, the car is back on rails, the old shocks were gone but the transformation is amazing. Car is now lowered aprox. 1.5 inches and there does not appear to be a problem with curbs or major bumps. Have not pushed it much till the alignment is complete, but would highly recommend.
Old 02-07-2007, 02:17 PM
  #22  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I currently have the M030 shocks, sways and eibach springs. Ride height is very low - maybe a little too low for most tastes - but I like it. I think the data sheet says that the car height drops 1.3 to 1.5 in using the eibachs over stock springs. As far as ride goes, Im happy with the suspension, but after driving a bilstein equipped car, I realize that I have no dampening - so I conclude that my shocks are shot.. Driving N into the San Fernando valley from LA on the 405 and the car handling stinks in the fast lane where the pavement is bad. I would assume better dampening would improve this..

Im thinking of upgrading to HDs since 90% of my driving is on the street. Does anyone know if ride height is going to change? I believe that others report that HDs will raise the car height.
Old 02-07-2007, 02:44 PM
  #23  
Jukelemon
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Jukelemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just don't follow how the shocks will create a height difference unless they are not identical in mounting specs and this can only be for the front. Springs set the ride height of the vehicle and the shocks set the dampening i.e. a shock does not have the ability to "hold" the vehicle at a certain level. Its job is to manage the spring rate in/out of compression.

Am I off on this guys or ??
Old 02-07-2007, 02:59 PM
  #24  
allill
Drifting
 
allill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jukelemon
I just don't follow how the shocks will create a height difference unless they are not identical in mounting specs and this can only be for the front. Springs set the ride height of the vehicle and the shocks set the dampening i.e. a shock does not have the ability to "hold" the vehicle at a certain level. Its job is to manage the spring rate in/out of compression.

Am I off on this guys or ??
the bilstein hd's they are talking about have threaded bodies (coilover).
Old 02-07-2007, 03:02 PM
  #25  
InTheAir
Nordschleife Master
 
InTheAir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jukelemon
I just don't follow how the shocks will create a height difference unless they are not identical in mounting specs and this can only be for the front. Springs set the ride height of the vehicle and the shocks set the dampening i.e. a shock does not have the ability to "hold" the vehicle at a certain level. Its job is to manage the spring rate in/out of compression.

Am I off on this guys or ??
You are correct. I haven't reread this thread to see who might have been supporting a position contrary to what you just said, but suffice it to say that you are correct.

That being said, the shocks themselves can be used to set the ride height because the shock bodies carry the lower spring perch upon which the springs rest. The stock shocks were essentially nonadjustable from a ride height perspective (....yes, the fronts had some minor adjustability in perch height, thus permitting minor ride height adjustment). The aftermarket shocks, namely Bilstein, have the threaded bodies that permit the lower spring perches to be set at an desired height, thus permitting the ride height to be set.

So, the shock mechanism does not set the ride height, but the threaded body of the shock does permit setting of ride heights.
Old 02-07-2007, 03:23 PM
  #26  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Jeff - thanks for the clarification. I have heard and read on old posts and pcar.com that the old Bilstein shocks may not have had enough thread up front to adjust the spring perch, but that problem has gone away on newer Bilstein shocks. I did not realize that it was the perch, I was unsure that the piston itself was raising the car.

With that said, it seems that Danny is saying that the Eibach/HD combo works. I read on the Eibach pro kit information that the springs 7209 and 7208 for the 993 are designed to have progressive spring rates and designed to carry the same maximum load as the stock suspension. Since they achieve same max load with the same unloaded -static - stack heightv as M030 but yet lower the car, Ive got to think that either the spring is slightly softer than stock in the initial compression (car weight only) and they get progressively stiffer faster than stock as the springs reach higher compression. The eibachs are designed to achieve same max load as stock springs. I guess the primary advantage to eibachs over stock is the overall lower CG of the car. Not sure how the well the eibach progressive spring rate matches the bilstein shocks compared to OEM springs..

Also, eibachs are heat treated and guaranteed to never sag for a million miles. If anyone has sagging issues over the life of the car, send them back.[/QUOTE]
Old 02-07-2007, 04:07 PM
  #27  
Jukelemon
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Jukelemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by InTheAir
You are correct. I haven't reread this thread to see who might have been supporting a position contrary to what you just said, but suffice it to say that you are correct.

That being said, the shocks themselves can be used to set the ride height because the shock bodies carry the lower spring perch upon which the springs rest. The stock shocks were essentially nonadjustable from a ride height perspective (....yes, the fronts had some minor adjustability in perch height, thus permitting minor ride height adjustment). The aftermarket shocks, namely Bilstein, have the threaded bodies that permit the lower spring perches to be set at an desired height, thus permitting the ride height to be set.

So, the shock mechanism does not set the ride height, but the threaded body of the shock does permit setting of ride heights.
Exactly.

That is what I was getting at i.e. it always the geometry of the spring which takes into consideration the mounting structures-regardless of whether they are on a strut or the chassis.
Old 02-07-2007, 04:10 PM
  #28  
InTheAir
Nordschleife Master
 
InTheAir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 5,351
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tj90
Jeff - thanks for the clarification. I have heard and read on old posts and pcar.com that the old Bilstein shocks may not have had enough thread up front to adjust the spring perch, but that problem has gone away on newer Bilstein shocks. I did not realize that it was the perch, I was unsure that the piston itself was raising the car.
With the original HDs, there was not enough thread to lower the front of our cars to RS ride height when using the ROW MO30 springs. Therefore, we would lower the fronts as low as they could go with the short-threaded HDs and then set the rears to get the correct suspension profile.

Gert at Carnewal approached Bilstein Germany to manufacture special HDs for him to include more threads on the front, thereby permitting more lowering with the MO30 combination. That's why everyone pretty much went to him to get the HDs.

However, Bilstein US liked the idea and because they are pretty much autonomous to Bilstein German, started selling all of their HDs with the extended threads in the US by default. Therefore, about 2 years ago, the HDs in the US started showing up with the extra threads. This was all realized when I organized the suspension group buy.

So, now, the HDs with the extra threads are more accessible and provide the necessary lowering for the MO30 springs.
Old 02-07-2007, 04:18 PM
  #29  
Nickels
Advanced
 
Nickels's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phi, Phi back at ya a 3rd time...Eta-Beta Chapter, Seton Hall
Old 02-07-2007, 07:24 PM
  #30  
Slow Guy
Race Director
 
Slow Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 10,272
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jukelemon
Thanks all.

I have a 95 C4 Cab. I drive VERY agressively but do not want/need a coilover kit.

I hear NO ONE running Konis on the Porsche's. That is surprising to me.
Koni makes a very good sport shock for the 968 but Bilstein doesn't make a shock for it. Maybe they got together and divided up the models (just kidding).


Quick Reply: Springs and shock choices



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:59 AM.