Dach X Sport Cats Installed & Dyno Tested
#16
Rennlist Member
Chris-Send Boris some cup mufflers for re-testing with the X-Pipes.
Should these gains be more or less or the same for varioram cars?
Btw- whats the 4WD dyno drivetrain loss for those of us C4Sers?
Should these gains be more or less or the same for varioram cars?
Btw- whats the 4WD dyno drivetrain loss for those of us C4Sers?
#18
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by tj90
Boris: You took the best of 3 runs. If you look at the average of the 3 runs, is there really a difference or are we looking at outliers? Im trying to understand if there really is a statistically significant difference. Thanks for posting - i bet you like the new sound!
A 3% increase in hp and a 1% increase in tq is nice because it assures me that there is no loss from stock cats due to design (which was the original question/concern, right?). I'm not sure I would call it a statistically significant increase.
Now Boris, you need to go out and buy examples of each competitor's bypass pipes and do a comparative test...JUST KIDDING!!!
#19
Race Car
I think ViperBob told me as much as 25% loss!!! My car (now thinking back) felt like a pig compared to now with the tube disconnected and the LWFW. Amazing transformation its been. I have disconnected it so I can do my own dyno runs and back up my (DACH) stuff.
My guess would be a torque loss but hp gain with the cup muffs since you'll loose all restriction/back pressure. I get on all these different configs after the first of the year and we finish the current GB. Oh and you can bet there will be dyno sheet posts, good bad or indifferent. No snow jobs here.
My guess would be a torque loss but hp gain with the cup muffs since you'll loose all restriction/back pressure. I get on all these different configs after the first of the year and we finish the current GB. Oh and you can bet there will be dyno sheet posts, good bad or indifferent. No snow jobs here.
#20
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Bull
A 3% increase in hp and a 1% increase in tq is nice because it assures me that there is no loss from stock cats due to design (which was the original question/concern, right?). I'm not sure I would call it a statistically significant increase.
With a sufficient amount of runs to collect enough data, both at baseline and with the DACHs, and someone to independently reproduce the results, you might find that these differences are statistically significant. But of course, that's very different than real-world relevant. But hey, whatever, they sound cool.
#21
Race Car
Originally Posted by Bull
With the best of three runs on each test, I don't think there are likely significant outliers. But the sheets will tell.
A 3% increase in hp and a 1% increase in tq is nice because it assures me that there is no loss from stock cats due to design (which was the original question/concern, right?). I'm not sure I would call it a statistically significant increase.
Now Boris, you need to go out and buy examples of each competitor's bypass pipes and do a comparative test...JUST KIDDING!!!
A 3% increase in hp and a 1% increase in tq is nice because it assures me that there is no loss from stock cats due to design (which was the original question/concern, right?). I'm not sure I would call it a statistically significant increase.
Now Boris, you need to go out and buy examples of each competitor's bypass pipes and do a comparative test...JUST KIDDING!!!
Now keep in mind on Boris' OBD1 ECU, it doesn't read after cat so it won't change like an OBD2 car and most likely won't yeild as good a result as an OBD2 ECU might. His cat is giving out raw power based soley on less than stock config restriction.
#22
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a GIAC chip in the car.
The testing was done by DEVEK (a reputable shop). Marc is typically on this board so he can chime in. He did the testing....
As for whether the difference is significant or not. well at 3.2% you are correct that it is not signficant. i don't know if i would even feel it in a car. but allow me to put it another way 8 ponies is 8 ponies and when i compare it to other things that i upgraded on the car (i.e. the GIAC chip which produced 3 hp) i consider this to be a wortwhile upgrade. Not only for the horsepower & torque but also for less weight & the sound.
I wish there was more way to squeeze horsepower out of these cars, but i have yet to find it.
Cheers,
Boris
Cheers,
Boris
The testing was done by DEVEK (a reputable shop). Marc is typically on this board so he can chime in. He did the testing....
As for whether the difference is significant or not. well at 3.2% you are correct that it is not signficant. i don't know if i would even feel it in a car. but allow me to put it another way 8 ponies is 8 ponies and when i compare it to other things that i upgraded on the car (i.e. the GIAC chip which produced 3 hp) i consider this to be a wortwhile upgrade. Not only for the horsepower & torque but also for less weight & the sound.
I wish there was more way to squeeze horsepower out of these cars, but i have yet to find it.
Cheers,
Boris
Cheers,
Boris
#23
Originally Posted by Boris Teksler
i have a GIAC chip in the car.
The testing was done by DEVEK (a reputable shop). Marc is typically on this board so he can chime in. He did the testing....
As for whether the difference is significant or not. well at 3.2% you are correct that it is not signficant. i don't know if i would even feel it in a car. but allow me to put it another way 8 ponies is 8 ponies and when i compare it to other things that i upgraded on the car (i.e. the GIAC chip which produced 3 hp) i consider this to be a wortwhile upgrade. Not only for the horsepower & torque but also for less weight & the sound.
I wish there was more way to squeeze horsepower out of these cars, but i have yet to find it.
Cheers,
Boris
Cheers,
Boris
The testing was done by DEVEK (a reputable shop). Marc is typically on this board so he can chime in. He did the testing....
As for whether the difference is significant or not. well at 3.2% you are correct that it is not signficant. i don't know if i would even feel it in a car. but allow me to put it another way 8 ponies is 8 ponies and when i compare it to other things that i upgraded on the car (i.e. the GIAC chip which produced 3 hp) i consider this to be a wortwhile upgrade. Not only for the horsepower & torque but also for less weight & the sound.
I wish there was more way to squeeze horsepower out of these cars, but i have yet to find it.
Cheers,
Boris
Cheers,
Boris
I have a X-Pipe set coming in Jan.. I cant wait.. !!!! I hope it all goes well with my OBDII car..
SinVancouver.
#27
Guru
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Originally Posted by ppressle
Is this the mythical 5 hp piece that Mr. Linton mentioned???
Great stuff! Must be like a completely different powerplant
#28
Originally Posted by chris walrod
Sure is. IIRC, the cup cars that use a similar piece to optimize crankcase vacuum also use a different FMS and RMS to avoid pulling-in debris pass the seals. Dont quote me on that but I remember some chatter about it at the recent PMNA open house.
Great stuff! Must be like a completely different powerplant
Great stuff! Must be like a completely different powerplant
As a precaution diff seals are used.
#30
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by 993inNC
I think we may just go ahead and make a set of the "other" widely discussed bypass pipes here. Whats there to a slightly bent pipe with a flange. And I will dyno those, we'll get to the bottom of this yet.
.........................................
.........................................