Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Top Speed Run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2006, 08:29 PM
  #46  
mr_bock
Three Wheelin'
 
mr_bock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL full time
Posts: 1,532
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Just after having the SC installed I had to do a research test.... M030 suspension, engine cover on... got up to 180 mph rock steady with about 1000 rpm till redline in sixth gear. With the speedo pegged, there was no need to go any faster!!! Test results... all positive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am a happy TPC customer
Old 10-16-2006, 10:27 PM
  #47  
993inNC
Race Car
 
993inNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 4,883
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

160....PSS9's, low and no tray. Backed out of it, may have had a mile or two an hour more to go but.......the road wasn't up to the challange
Old 10-17-2006, 06:22 AM
  #48  
'95 993
Instructor
 
'95 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I hit an indicated 175 mph in my non varioram c2 with billet heads at Elvington airfield (where Richard Hammond crashed) it was still creeping up the speedo but I ran out of runway.

Boy it really focusses the mind when you have very large earth bank and farmers field ~ 200 yrds in front of you and you are doing an indicated 175mph and the braking point is behind you!

Glad I had big reds and cup sports on :-)

I didn't try again for vmax after that

John
Old 01-02-2008, 05:41 PM
  #49  
AtlJimK
Pro
 
AtlJimK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not 2 b a noob but...

Did the test this week. Today FL SR471 = 150 ~4 or there abouts, felt solid, stock susp., cooker on, on-coming traffic forced slow-down. Cruised @ 140+ for 1.5 minutes. Looking forward to the PSS9's. I can see the addictive nature of these cars now.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=e...wloc=addr&om=1

Prior speed tests>'03 Audi TT Quattro = 127 Camp mack rd, not safe.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=e...wloc=addr&om=1

Last edited by AtlJimK; 01-03-2008 at 07:00 AM.
Old 01-02-2008, 06:02 PM
  #50  
2Many Cars
Three Wheelin'
 
2Many Cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On the Faultline
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here's how you can do it legally:

http://www.silverstateclassic.com/31...escription.htm
Old 01-02-2008, 07:21 PM
  #51  
dcdude
Drifting
 
dcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Bay, Los Angeles
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LAT
Zombie, am I reading you right, removing the engine tray reduced stability?

Never heard of this before but then again how many people test their cars at 150+ mph.
+1. Actually, there was more than one poster wth this result. I was gonna say- time to dig your engine tray out of the landfill for those top speed runs. I'm no aerodynamic engineer, but the engine tray does flatten out the bottom. That has to reduce drag, but does it add downforce? Any experts? Chis Walrod?
Old 01-02-2008, 07:26 PM
  #52  
WHB Porsche
I'm Still Jenny
Rennlist Member
 
WHB Porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 5,198
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Somebody said in a thread that they'd found in the workshop manual something about not testing the car above 95mph w/out the tray.
Old 01-02-2008, 08:56 PM
  #53  
993MAN
Drifting
 
993MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

280kmph in my Turbo 3.6. For anyone that has travelled NZ, it was in between the town of Murupara and Rotorua on the back roads. Pure flat straits and as smooth as with no pot holes. Probably the best road in the North Island.
The car was not done either, I chickened out.
That was a rush. Engine drip tray was off dammit. Might have got more had it been on.
Old 01-02-2008, 09:31 PM
  #54  
Marco69
Advanced
 
Marco69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcdude68
+1. Actually, there was more than one poster wth this result. I was gonna say- time to dig your engine tray out of the landfill for those top speed runs. I'm no aerodynamic engineer, but the engine tray does flatten out the bottom. That has to reduce drag, but does it add downforce? Any experts? Chis Walrod?
A flat bottom will help reduce turbulence and lift under the car. Depending on the configuration of the front and rear bumpers, down-force is possible at those speeds. This is how cars achieve down-force without using airfoils or wings today! Removing the engine tray may help with cooling, but will have a negative effect aerodynamically speaking!
Old 01-02-2008, 09:41 PM
  #55  
quasr
Racer
 
quasr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Top Speed

Nice to live vicariously through you guys while reading this thread. I admit that I have had my 993 over the speed limit, but never at the top speeds you guys mention. Great to imagine that mine will maybe do somewhere near the speeds you indicate. Fun posting! Be careful out there. Thanks.
Old 01-02-2008, 11:20 PM
  #56  
95FL993CAB
Three Wheelin'
 
95FL993CAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Fl.
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=AtlJimK;4938923]Not 2 b a noob but...

Did the test this week. Today FL SR471 = 150 ~4 or there abouts, felt solid, stock susp. on-coming traffic forced slow-down. Cruised @ 140+ for 1.5 minutes. Looking forward to the PSS9's. I can see the addictive nature of these cars now.

Were you going to the Seminole War recreation by any chance??? I wanted to go but was side tracked.
Fastest I have been is 145 and there was MUCH more left It felt very stable as well.
Ron
Old 01-03-2008, 12:06 AM
  #57  
Amfab
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Amfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

About 13 years go coming through Nevada in my '84 Targa, with no spoilers, with my then wife, and a fully packed car I hit 147 mph (owners manual said top speed was 146 mph).
Those last 5 mph took forever because I hit the aerodynamic limit of that car with that HP.
The chin spoiler—that I did not have—on the '84 Carrera is a definite must after 120-130. The front gets scary light. . . I had so much crap in the back seats that I think that helped the rear stay down.

I swore I wouldn't do that again.

Images of a small bulge in the tire, causing a blow out at that speed are haunting. My mind goes back to parking on that one hill and turning the wheel to the curb, then getting out and seeing the tire mashed against the curb. . .
At about 125 mph my mind goes back to that picture and it unnerves me.

I am still amazed at modern tire design— although a friend of mine and his wife spent the better part of a year recovering from a Explorer/Firestone Rollover at 65 Mph on a skiing trip in Utah.

These are the types of images that come into my head in these situations and I am far from an adrenaline junkie, I get enough of that in daily life.

There is a lyric of a Police song "Synchronicity 2" that I remember when Im in situations like flying through the hills trying to break the back end lose or making a high speed run—even though that is not what the song is about—it goes:

"Daddy grips the wheel and stares alone into the distance,
He knows that something somewhere has to break."



The foregoing not withstanding, coming back across the U.S after buying my 993 Targa last year, I thought Id never go faster than 120 mph again, but 135mph was so stable feeling and so easily attainable it lulled me into safety at that speed, I swear I thought the car could come down safely if there were a blow out.
But 160mph? I don't think my over-active imagination would let me do it.
Put me in a GT-40 or something with a cage maybe, but 135mph in a rolling greenhouse is fine for me. . . as long as it is making those wonderful noises. . .
Old 01-03-2008, 03:19 AM
  #58  
Marco69
Advanced
 
Marco69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quasr
Nice to live vicariously through you guys while reading this thread. I admit that I have had my 993 over the speed limit, but never at the top speeds you guys mention. Great to imagine that mine will maybe do somewhere near the speeds you indicate. Fun posting! Be careful out there. Thanks.
I was keeping quite, but based on your statement, now I have to say it:

I haven't taken my 993 to its limits, but I have taken the car to 145mph in the rain!!! It wasn't a downpour, buit it had been raining for a couple of days so it was really wet with a light rain coming down at the moment. Car felt planted, but rear tires seemed to dance a bit, perhaps not enough tread left to clear the water at that speed - it was fun if only for a moment.
Old 01-03-2008, 10:16 AM
  #59  
HJK
Pro
 
HJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

170 mph on the speedo, on expressways outbound from Bangkok, BUT..... Garmin then only gives 155 so I wonder about the big difference. Trust the garmin more then the speedo so should be able to find a few more miles per hour...
Henk
Old 01-03-2008, 10:25 AM
  #60  
melman911
Burning Brakes
 
melman911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Having done 140mph in my Corrado
I use to have one of those. G60 or VR6?


Quick Reply: Top Speed Run



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:32 AM.