Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

9m heads make 350 BHP on N/A 95 993

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2006, 06:12 PM
  #91  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superyellowfly
Colin,
anything going for a turbo owner?
just curious

How about a 500bhp/600Nm package for a euro 930 K-Jet that costs less than £10k?

Entirely developed in-house at 9m, we based the package around a radical new turbocharger design which has been tested for the last 9 months without any issues whatsoever. We had to opportunity to retest the car today following routine service work, and on our newly refurbished dyno it posted 492bhp & 605Nm despite running with a reduced ignition timing of 27 deg and yet to be optimised fuelling. The spread of the torque curve is the best aspect, having more than 500Nm from 3000rpm upwards.

I'll post the results later on the turbo forum, soon to be followed by a similar package which is going onto a 3.6 965 turbo.
Old 03-23-2006, 06:16 PM
  #92  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Loren,
You really believe that a 964 motor runs on the knock sensor ???????

Knock sense gives more freedom to run closer to the knock limit but as you know ?? when the DME goes into knock the timing retard is appreciable and has a pretty long recovery time constant . Not a good idea for performance !!

Knock control should be there for extreme conditions coupled with owner use of fuel with relatively poor quality ! In other words confusion at the pump!

The 964 RS runs more agressive timing to achieve its +10bhp. The way it is done is very safe. We could go off into rev related detonation sensitivity but I guess the fact that Porsche are happy should be enough ?

We will obviously never change each others position on this subject so I will leave you alone now !!

All the best

Geoff
Old 03-23-2006, 06:52 PM
  #93  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by graham_mitchell
Colin, as an aside, great to see you became a Rennlist sponsor I think you have a lot to offer the 964/993 community here.

Big thanks for the complement.

I like to think that I am giving more than I am taking, especially when it comes to the bigger aircooled engines. That said I know I will wind up a lot of tuners with many of my off-the-wall ideas and developments, and will hence take a lot of flack for achieving the seemingly impossible.

Funnily enough I was talking to a close friend of mine tonight about comments others make about his abilities in 2 stroke tuning, to which he replied that if you only ever try the same old stuff you will only ever achieve the same old results, hence it is only by pushing the envelope and trying new stuff that you will achieve the impossible. Hopefully this message comes across with the detail and information in my posts, and I look forward to others leading on from where I have left off, for the good of all concerned.
Old 03-23-2006, 09:31 PM
  #94  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"when the DME goes into knock the timing retard is appreciable and has a pretty long recovery time constant ."

Not really correct per Porsche 964 manual WKD 495 121 pg 2-08!

"Not a good idea for performance !!"

Sounds like Bosch/Porsche engineers got it wrong! Hum?

The knock system can retard EACH cylinder individually. The knock system knows after
the next cylinder firing whether to retard further or return the timing to the original
setting. So, in about 20ms (6000 RPMs - 2 crank revs) the knock system knows to
do one of three outcomes; further retard, normal advance, or additional retard to
the max of 9 degrees per the pinging cylinder.

Remember, the 964 DME ECM has three microcontrollers running in
parallel one of which does DSP only on the knock signal.

Bottom line: THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT/NOTICEABLE RECOVERY TIME CONSTANT!
Old 03-24-2006, 12:50 AM
  #95  
ruffy
Burning Brakes
 
ruffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
How about a 500bhp/600Nm package for a euro 930 K-Jet that costs less than £10k?
you have my complete and undivided attention...
993TT?... im sure the technology is transferable in some form or another?
Old 03-24-2006, 05:26 AM
  #96  
sfl993t4
Instructor
 
sfl993t4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Or as an alternative Colin's heads, cams etc. could be used on a 993TT. Its something I've been thinking of (although not sure what the gains would be over going with different turbos etc.).
Old 03-24-2006, 07:22 AM
  #97  
Robin 993 c2
Instructor
 
Robin 993 c2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK, Essex
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On the mapping issue. I have worked for many years in Indy car and F1 engine mapping with Penske and Mercedes, I decided to pay for a remap of my car on the rolling road after the conversion.I am pleased with the approach and the result. Sure i could have had a go myself, but there is no substitute for experience with a given engine and system.
Old 03-24-2006, 01:09 PM
  #98  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,443
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superyellowfly
you have my complete and undivided attention...
993TT?... im sure the technology is transferable in some form or another?

The major problem with the 993TT is the darn ecu and it peculiarities with MAF limitation during long high boost pulls. Therefore, in typical 9m fashion, rather than accept the compromise and frig the MAF signal like most other tuners, our solution is to build a custom ecu which will be literally plug-and-play. Key features of the ecu will include 88 Bosch plug fitting, fully dealer programmable software that can be configured to run in MAF, MAP or Alpha-N mode, full range high-sensitivity twin knock control, twin lambda and 4Mb logging as standard.

The relevant aspect of the ecu development to the 993 thread is that with minor revisions we can also configure it to the 993 Varioram engine, thus for high level conversions (like the 9m 4.0 litre race engine project) or where the stock ecu cannot be programmed correctly, the 9m ecu should be the answer that tuners are looking for. The ecu is currently in test on other engines, including a current Le Mans V8 Sports Prototype engine which is run on the edge of detonation for maximum power and lasts 24hrs, so it should be good enough to run the aircooled 911 engines. Given that its capabilities are way beyond the top of the range Motec M800, the price will be around £4k ($6.5k), some of which will be offset by not having to pay for a wiring loom or installation.
Old 03-24-2006, 03:55 PM
  #99  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Loren,

The knock system can retard EACH cylinder individually. The knock system knows after
the next cylinder firing whether to retard further or return the timing to the original
setting. So, in about 20ms (6000 RPMs - 2 crank revs) the knock system knows to
do one of three outcomes; further retard, normal advance, or additional retard to
the max of 9 degrees per the pinging cylinder
.

That is nearly correct . As you will know all knock systems incorporate a delay between knock control action and incremental step recovery back to standard..The time constant of recovery rate is software controlled.It is usually several motor cycles per step.This is analogeous to us making sure trouble has passed before making a move !!

The detonation sensitivity of a motor plotted against rpm is a kind of U shape.

So at idle and high rpm detonation sensitivity is low. Maximum sensitivity and problems occur around the maximum bmep /torque region.
Searching for best power/timing at high rpm should not involve detonation unless stupid advance levels are put in place.

Hope that helps the discussion.

All the best

Geoff
Old 03-24-2006, 05:36 PM
  #100  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"The time constant of recovery rate is software controlled"

Again, it's NOT a time as an engine revolution has a variable time
based on the RPM!
Old 03-24-2006, 05:47 PM
  #101  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Loren,
It is usually several motor cycles per step

Geoff
Old 03-24-2006, 10:55 PM
  #102  
LAT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
LAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,280
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Colin,

Is the ECU for the TT ready for sale. I have my CTR-2 being rebuilt at RUF and as you mentioned the limitation with the develepment of power is the ECU.
I am an interested buyer.

Thanks

LAT
Old 03-24-2006, 11:16 PM
  #103  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"It is usually several motor cycles per step" - Red rooster -

So, now you correct your statement about a "time constant".

Just like the following statement:

"The chip in an ECU holds the operating system and look- up tables( maps ).
The operating system is written for the hardware platform in the ECU."

- Red rooster -

RIght!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe the OS is the old Microsoft Win3.1, a pre-release of Win95, or maybe Unix.
Or maybe Bill Gates gave Bosch his ideas for the new Windows "Vista" he was
thinking about in the '80s and releasing in 2006.

Please! Engine management systems (interrupt driven controllers or basic state
machines) DON'T use an operating system.
Old 03-25-2006, 12:55 AM
  #104  
wayne325
Instructor
 
wayne325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ya - I can just see it now.... "please wait 2 minutes between these sparks while I update....."
Old 03-25-2006, 10:24 AM
  #105  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Loren,
It is difficult to know at what level to pitch these discussions .

In the system development world, through idleness ,the interchange of a time delay measured in mS and a delay of so many motor cycles is widespread.

The use of the term "operating system " was to bring home the concept of a programme running in the background with values being "looked up " from tables.

If this has caused you great offence I apologise.

Wayne ,
I will look back through my stuff and find for you the kind of delays I am talking about or are you just being amusing ??

All the best

Geoff


Quick Reply: 9m heads make 350 BHP on N/A 95 993



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:59 AM.