Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

LWF should I or should I not? final decision!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2006, 09:43 AM
  #31  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
.....................

"This is what they feel the general public wants." - Viperbob -

Sounds like Porsche needs a new Strategic Marketing Manager.
They have been in need of that person for quite some time!
Old 02-17-2006, 01:59 PM
  #32  
wayne325
Instructor
 
wayne325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've had a lightweight flywheel for over a year on my 97 993. I very much like the feel and I
wouldn't go back to the stock dual-mass flywheel.
One downside - in TX we have annual safety inspections. The goofy kid doing the inspection
was incapable of driving my car. I think he stalled it 6 or 7 times trying to get it going. I think he
was a bit nervous.
Old 02-18-2006, 06:01 PM
  #33  
Ron Cohn
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Ron Cohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gardiner, NY
Posts: 318
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love the combination of LWF and short gearing. It does change the personality of the car and the RPM control for heel and toe downshifting is far more sharp and precise. If you are a competent driver and truly want to extact more performance from your car (while not actually increasing horsepower) a LWF and short gearing are the way to go. From there, you have to go to more HP and less weight to achieve better acceleration.

Since I have decided to disassemble my C2S and sell as close to stock as possible, I am offering my LWF, G5-30 short-geared box, RS clutch and LSD for swap and $$$$.
Old 02-19-2006, 08:22 AM
  #34  
RS man
Rennlist Member
 
RS man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Did any of you guy know that the non-clubsport 993RS have the DMF!? My car is just fine with the DMF and yes it is the 993RS I have. When I change the flywheel I may entertain the idea of the LWF. I don't drive my car daily, nor do I want to. Agree with the previous poster - don't just do it because people are saying that you should. Consider your useage and decide what YOU want.

Harry
Old 02-19-2006, 11:39 AM
  #35  
Caveman
Rennlist Member
 
Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bucks, England
Posts: 3,276
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

That's news to me - I thought all RS cars had them on then 993?

Cheers,

David
Old 02-19-2006, 11:49 AM
  #36  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,313
Received 536 Likes on 371 Posts
Default

That's news to me - I thought all RS cars had them on then 993?
RS Man is correct, only the 993RS/CS has the single mass f/w.

I have a single mass in both of my cars, it's not an issue.

I do agree that besides weight loss, lwf and short gears are the best bang for these cars.
Old 02-20-2006, 02:03 AM
  #37  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,362
Received 68 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

How about longevity? The RS clutch is much simplier and more conventional. The DMF is this complicated flywheel that is known to have problems with its mechanism over time. I have had problems with mine well before the clutch disk was worn out. I also think you can reface the RS flywheel but the DMF cannot be refaced...

Cheers,

Mike



Quick Reply: LWF should I or should I not? final decision!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:09 PM.