Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Formal Appology

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2006 | 02:58 AM
  #76  
adams993's Avatar
adams993
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA / Paris, FR
Default

Well ebay deleted my thread...due to the fact that I someone here posted that it was fraudulent...so they even cancelled my new thread...SO there is another $5 in listing fees downt he drain. Relisting again:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...MESE%3AIT&rd=1

ADAM
Old 01-26-2006 | 03:33 AM
  #77  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Leland Pate
Exactly how is any ole photograph floating around the net copyrighted? If I snap a picture of my car right now and post it on this board. I have not "copyrighted" the image, have I?... I mean if this were the case any time you swipe some funny photo and post it around you are violating a the original photagrapher's copyright?
Leland,

The way I understand it, yes, one would be violating copyright law by swiping a photo. Unless the law has changed, the last time I checked, a photo is copyrighted the instant it's created, the creator having sole authorship of the image. No copyright notice is required under US law. I believe it helps to have the image registered under US copyright laws if you have to sue over the usage.


http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#wwp

http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html
Old 01-26-2006 | 04:21 AM
  #78  
pcar964's Avatar
pcar964
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
Leland,

The way I understand it, yes, one would be violating copyright law by swiping a photo. Unless the law has changed, the last time I checked, a photo is copyrighted the instant it's created, the creator having sole authorship of the image. No copyright notice is required under US law. I believe it helps to have the image registered under US copyright laws if you have to sue over the usage.


http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#wwp

http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html
Interesting, learn something new every day!
Old 01-26-2006 | 05:32 AM
  #79  
David in LA's Avatar
David in LA
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,510
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Leland Pate
...I mean if this were the case any time you swipe some funny photo and post it around you are violatingthe original photagrapher's copyright? That doesn't sound right....
I think it depends on the intention underlying the posting of the pic...if it is to comment on, criticize or a "hey look at this" I think it is viewed as fair use and it not a violation....using the pic for commercial purposes (say posting on your website to sell rims orsell something on ebay) would be a violation though. Now if you take a pic of the car yourself then you are the one that owns the copyright on the pic, even though the car is not yours.
Old 01-26-2006 | 05:50 AM
  #80  
Adrian's Avatar
Adrian
Addict
Lead Rennlist
Technical Advisor
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,027
Likes: 16
From: Parafield Gardens
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
Leland,

The way I understand it, yes, one would be violating copyright law by swiping a photo. Unless the law has changed, the last time I checked, a photo is copyrighted the instant it's created, the creator having sole authorship of the image. No copyright notice is required under US law. I believe it helps to have the image registered under US copyright laws if you have to sue over the usage.


http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#wwp

http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html
Mark,
This is only correct if the photograph does not contain previously copyrighted content. Take care nowadays when taking photographs you intend to use in a commercial nature.
An example: It is a breach of copyright if you take a picture of a painting at an art gallery and you use that image commercially without the copyright owner's permission. That may or may not be the art gallery.
Be aware also that many items previously thought to be out of copyright are being re-registered. Many of the old masters are now under copyright again.
Copyright laws are changing all the time and the latest batch are bordering on the ridiculous.
For private use this is all covered under the "Fair Use" clauses, but for commercial activities including E-bay listings, take no chances. The average out of court settlement for commercial copyright infringement is between 350 and 1000 bucks per image used.
Ciao,
Adrian.
Old 01-26-2006 | 06:00 AM
  #81  
delanobe's Avatar
delanobe
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 223
From: Belgium
Default

Just find out that you also used my car in the add and I'm NOT pleased with it!! I'm asking very friendly (for now) to remove that picture of my car NOW.
Old 01-26-2006 | 06:06 AM
  #82  
adams993's Avatar
adams993
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA / Paris, FR
Default

I have removed your car man!
ADAM
Old 01-26-2006 | 06:09 AM
  #83  
delanobe's Avatar
delanobe
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 223
From: Belgium
Default

Ok, thanks!
Old 01-26-2006 | 08:18 AM
  #84  
DC from Cape Cod's Avatar
DC from Cape Cod
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 51
From: South Carolina
Default

I like the old Rennlist better....you people should try being a little nicer to each other.
Old 01-26-2006 | 10:18 AM
  #85  
Traffic53's Avatar
Traffic53
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 986
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by adams993
I have already changed it to be satisfactory to others.
adam-
just curious here. while i don't agree with posting an ad with incomplete or incorrect info, i do wonder why you care what this forum thinks? you have taken about as much abuse as i've seen on rennlist- and i've seen some wicked catfights here. why are you so eager to please this community?

in your apology, you ask for 'one more chance'. what? one more chance for what? acceptance into an online community? i only hope that you, and those who've been your biggest critics give your jobs as much effort as you have this thread.

your move was in bad taste. it's been covered. we should immediately get back to the "how do you like my new steering wheel" threads
Old 01-26-2006 | 10:33 AM
  #86  
TheOtherEric's Avatar
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 36
From: Chicago
Default

Wow I don't understand why you guys are bashing Adam. Did I miss something? So what if he bought a bumper on ebay for $350 then relisted it for sale there? Where's the harm?? He won that auction fair and square, no? And if he lists it claiming outright lies and misleading info, SO WHAT? Welcome to ebay.

As for using R'listers photos, that was bad form, nothing more. And he's making it right.
Old 01-26-2006 | 10:41 AM
  #87  
TS's Avatar
TS
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Adam,

Correct way : delete the images without permission, ask for permission and then insert the image with permission.
This is what you do: let the images without permission, ask for permission without deleting the images, ...

It's the first time I use my PC this week. I see only now your PM...why my car's picture is still there? I haven't reply to your PM...





you sent me an PM for using my car's picture
It was correct to delete the image without repl
without deleting
Old 01-26-2006 | 10:47 AM
  #88  
TS's Avatar
TS
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Ops...sorry forgot to delete the last three lines in my reply.
Old 01-26-2006 | 11:53 AM
  #89  
Edward's Avatar
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 365
From: So.CA
Default

Originally Posted by DC from Cape Cod
I like the old Rennlist better....you people should try being a little nicer to each other.
Exactly! What happened to offering a little understanding and consideration, even if someone actually did screw up or commit a lapse in judgment. Now I don't even know Adam (don't know him from Adam ), but seriously, you guys with the most heated language ought to think about you behavior ...it really is an unflattering testament of your own characters, and it stains the overall character of the board, not to mention it trumps Adams' apology and desire to make good. Like the debacle of old, I am disgusted. Signing off on this thread!

Edward
Old 01-26-2006 | 11:56 AM
  #90  
Davies's Avatar
Davies
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: Wilton, CT
Default

Originally Posted by DC from Cape Cod
I like the old Rennlist better....you people should try being a little nicer to each other.
I agree.

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
Wow I don't understand why you guys are bashing Adam. Did I miss something? So what if he bought a bumper on ebay for $350 then relisted it for sale there? Where's the harm?? He won that auction fair and square, no? And if he lists it claiming outright lies and misleading info, SO WHAT? Welcome to ebay.

As for using R'listers photos, that was bad form, nothing more. And he's making it right.
Again, I agree. I am sure all of you were paragons of virtue when you were 22 years old. Adam is - in his own awkward way - bending over backwards to admit his error and appease you guys. I can't believe you people don't have anything better to do than continue hounding the kid like a pack of hyenas.

Have any of you actually suffered as a result of his actions?
It appears he's learned his lesson, now how about all you grownups learning your own lesson. Teach grace by example.


Quick Reply: Formal Appology



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:17 AM.