Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Suspension/Rake Concerns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2005, 10:55 PM
  #1  
mrdraco
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrdraco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Suspension/Rake Concerns

My 993 has just returned after having the suspension fixed. The previous owner had screwed it up badly. The rear sway bar was frozen and the shock collars were so low as to make the suspension useless . After the work, a 4 wheel alignment and corner balance was done.

I am concerned about the front suspension now. ALL the rake is gone and the front fender height is higher that the rear. I also feel the front end "bouncing" a bit more, of course it wasn't moving at all before. This doesn't seem right. The specs are below.

Corner Balance
Left Front: 647 Right Front: 610
Left Rear: 940 Right Rear: 898

Front Weight: 1257 Percentage: 40.7%
Front Weight: 1838 Percentage: 59.3%

Car weight with driver: 3095

Fender Height
Left Front: 24 13/16 Right Front: 24 13/16
Left Rear: 24 3/4 Right Rear: 24 3/4

Alignment
Front
Camber Left: -1.0 Right: -1.0
Caster Left: +5.75 Right +6.0
Toe In: 1/16

Rear
Camber Left: -2.0 Right: -2.0
Toe In: 3/32

Before and after pictures: The second pic is in the rain(still raining now) so the quality is lousy.
Attached Images   
Old 11-09-2005, 11:18 PM
  #2  
kkim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There should be a 1 degree forward down rake. Easiest way to measure is laying a protracter on the door sill.

Was the kinematic toe set properly at the time of alignment?
Old 11-09-2005, 11:31 PM
  #3  
mrdraco
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrdraco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The alignment specs list "toe in", is this the kinematic toe?
Front
Toe In: 1/16

Rear
Toe In: 3/32
Old 11-09-2005, 11:45 PM
  #4  
kkim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No, kinematic toe is set when doing the rear camber adjustment. It takes special tools to set it correctly. You may want to find out if your alignment shop had the correct tools to do this job as KT can really affect handling.

Also, a cheap protracter from sears can be used to check for proper rake angle.
Old 11-09-2005, 11:53 PM
  #5  
cabrio993
Race Car
 
cabrio993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 4,682
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Your fender height of 24 3/4 rear and 24 13/16 front is 1/16th of an inch difference. You can say that your car is setup at 24 3/4 all around.

How full was your gas tank when you took these measurements? How much gas was in the car when the ride height was set by the shop. Expect 1/4 of an inch difference from a full tank vs an empty tank. Your toe in changes too as the gas tank gets empty, nose raises, front tires toes out.

Do you still have the same tires from the previous owner on? It may take few hunderd miles before the tires wear out to the new alignment settings, that could explain your unsettled feeling up front.
Old 11-09-2005, 11:59 PM
  #6  
mrdraco
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrdraco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't know about the kinematic toe as the alignment was outsourced to a specialty shop.

I have a protractor, where do i measure the rake angle?
Old 11-10-2005, 12:01 AM
  #7  
mrdraco
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrdraco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The tank was 5/8 full. Tires are brand new PS2s, same size as previous.
Old 11-10-2005, 12:15 AM
  #8  
kkim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

First off, this is the type of protractor I'm talking about.




With the door open, you can place it on the door sill.

You really should find out who did the alignment and ask them if they have the proper tools for the KT alignment. Many shops w/o the proper tools just max out the adjuster and call it good.

Also, as pointed out, your fender height measurements are about even. IIRC, when the rake is set properly, the front fender height usually is about 1/2" higher than the rear. If anything, it sounds like the front is too low.

You might want to consider having the corner balance, height adjustment and alignment redone or taken somewhere else that knows what they are doing.
Old 11-10-2005, 12:15 AM
  #9  
c993k
Rennlist Member
 
c993k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I loved the way that car looked when you first showed it to us. The previous owner should be able to answer any questions about the way it was set up. Have you contacted him?
By what you are describing I think a new suspension system is in order. It's not that expensive and it gives you peace of mind to you know what you have is perfect, not something that has seen a lot of track time. Chris
Old 11-10-2005, 12:25 AM
  #10  
mrdraco
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mrdraco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lala Land
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a simpler protractor I use to measure angles when building my plane. My main concern was finding a line on the car that was going follow the rake angle.
Old 11-10-2005, 12:29 AM
  #11  
kkim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrdraco
IMy main concern was finding a line on the car that was going follow the rake angle.
And from what I've read in past posts, the door sill is that line. Give it a try and see what you come out with.
Old 11-10-2005, 01:22 AM
  #12  
Ponchobroke
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ponchobroke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: So. Oregon
Posts: 463
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Kelly is ABSOLUTLY correct..KT is critical. I would make certain you question the shop who did the work directly. The least it will do is to keep you from looking silly (stupid) when the car makes a move you didn't expect at a critical time!



p.s. Kelly sorry to hear you leaving us for a while
Old 11-10-2005, 07:32 AM
  #13  
Dudley
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shrewsbury MA
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Be careful with fender height measurements, they do not always correspond exactly with the actual frame measurements used in setting the height. Mine did not. It is also unusual that your fender heights would correspond exactly from left side to right. I might expect some slight difference resulting from the adjustments for corner balance. Mine did. Kelley is right on - take it to a shop that can answer your questions. BTW - Nice car.
Old 11-10-2005, 07:32 AM
  #14  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It is generally correct that the rake angle of the car will be right when the front fender lip is approx 1/2 inch higher than the rear.
Old 11-10-2005, 10:36 AM
  #15  
viperbob
Former Vendor
 
viperbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 6,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will assume for a moment that the shop that did you alignement used the proper frame points to set the ride height, and that the wheel well measurements are just a result and that your car is square. Now, I hope you have EVO uprights as your car is way low and I can tell you for a fact that it is going to have some serious bump steer. The statement that you made "I also feel the front end "bouncing" a bit more" makes me think that you do not and your bouncing is in fact bump steer.

Now to the specs. 1 degree more in the rear than the front?? This is not right. You are going to have a great bit of under steer. For street as a safety precation a half degree more in the rear than front is normal. For real serious track cars, you want MORE negaive camber in front than the rear. Also 1 degree in front is nothing. With camber plates you can get up to about 3.5 degrees. I use to run -3 front and -2.7 rear. Of course your final settings will be a matter of your own comfort level, but -1/-2 is not good. Try to see if they can come up to at least -1.3 F and drop the rear by at around .5 to -1.5 to -1.6. This will at lest give you a car that is closer to neutral on the alignment. (I have a tough time recommending no camber diff unless I know the driver and his/her capabilities).

Now the toe. 1/16" is still a lot. If you can stand a little tram lining on the street, drop it to 1/32" (you still have good caster so this shouldn't be a real problem). At least drop it down closer to 1/32".

Last edited by viperbob; 11-10-2005 at 12:12 PM.



Quick Reply: Suspension/Rake Concerns



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 AM.