Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another Suspension Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2023, 09:38 AM
  #1  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default Another Suspension Build Thread

Hi All,

I picked up my 95 C2 in November 2019. The car was already modified with the following suspension components:
  • KW v1 coils
  • Monoball toe arms
  • Monoball strut tops
  • Monoball droplinks

During my ownership, I have made the following suspension-related changes:
  • Walrod front control arm bushings
  • RS engine mounts
  • Strut brace
  • Steering rack brace
  • Corner balance/alignment

The car is very low, 15-20mm below RS (103mm f, 92mm r). Picture below:



Given I am so low, I have been experiencing a lot of bumpsteer in the front and recently came across a great deal on a set of used RS uprights with bearings/hubs already installed. I am planning on the following suspension changes and would love your feedback:
  • RS uprights
  • Tarett-style monoball outer tie rods with RSR inner tie rods - I believe this is the only way to get the RSR inners (or pin them, which I would rather not do)
  • Elephant racing rear solid subframe bushings (bring up the rear subframe to allow more rear suspension travel)
  • RoW Turbo 993 anti-roll bars (22m f/21mm r) and new bushings (PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE A SET FOR SALE)
  • Check all rear arms
  • Adjust height, re-align/corner balance

I'd love some feedback on my plan, especially around the choice of tie rods and anti-roll bars.

Thanks as always,
Hootie
Old 01-05-2023, 11:59 AM
  #2  
Mr.Woolery
Burning Brakes
 
Mr.Woolery's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 794
Received 140 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

RS hubs will address your bumpsteer issues. The other mods will be overall improvements, but not necessarily directly fix the bumpsteer issue.
The following users liked this post:
Gbos1 (01-05-2023)
Old 01-05-2023, 02:00 PM
  #3  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 559 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

If you haven't addressed the rear now is the time to do it

at a minimum RS KT and A-arm

depending on ride height solid side mounts
Old 01-05-2023, 02:11 PM
  #4  
71-3.0-911
Rennlist Member
 
71-3.0-911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,453
Received 761 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

More of a question really but why are you going with turbo swaybars instead of RS specific at your ride height?



The following users liked this post:
Macs993 (03-05-2023)
Old 01-05-2023, 02:15 PM
  #5  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71-3.0-911
More of a question really but why are you going with turbo swaybars instead of RS specific at your ride height?
Cost and higher likelihood of finding used bars. Those prices you've quoted are outdated - everything has gotten more expensive.
Old 01-05-2023, 02:25 PM
  #6  
os993
Rennlist Member
 
os993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Altos
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Received 409 Likes on 253 Posts
Default

Any thoughts of raising it to RS or slightly higher? I'm slightly higher than RS on 17" cup wheels and it looks great and you eliminate all these issues.
Old 01-05-2023, 05:03 PM
  #7  
71-3.0-911
Rennlist Member
 
71-3.0-911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,453
Received 761 Likes on 511 Posts
Default

Not my table, agreed that its old. I just purchased a rear RS sway from Sonnen for less than $400. Just need to know where to look.

-Scott
Old 01-05-2023, 09:13 PM
  #8  
IainM
Drifting
 
IainM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 2,111
Received 306 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

I got a used one from Einmalig a year or so ago.
$200
Old 01-05-2023, 10:00 PM
  #9  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
If you haven't addressed the rear now is the time to do it

at a minimum RS KT and A-arm

depending on ride height solid side mounts
@Bill Verburg, what do you think about the choice of tie rod? The Tarett monoball outer tie rod with RSR inner tie rod? Is there a reason why I should go with the traditional ball joint?
Old 01-06-2023, 10:17 AM
  #10  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 559 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hootie
@Bill Verburg, what do you think about the choice of tie rod? The Tarett monoball outer tie rod with RSR inner tie rod? Is there a reason why I should go with the traditional ball joint?
There are only 2 tie rod outers
stock, bent
RS, straight

The stock ones are only used w/ stock wheel carriers
RS only used w/ RS wheel carriers

additionally, each is mounted on a different side of its wheel carrier

There are 3 different inners, any of which can be used w/ either of the above outers
stock w/ a rubber connection to the outer
RS w/ a stiffer rubber connection to the outer
RSR(Tarret) w/ a mono-ball connection to the outer

The Porsche motorsports RSR is NLA, so Tarrett is the way to go

best i've used is RS wheel carriers, RS outer RSR inner
The following users liked this post:
SpeedyC2 (01-06-2023)
Old 01-06-2023, 01:55 PM
  #11  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
There are only 2 tie rod outers
stock, bent
RS, straight

The stock ones are only used w/ stock wheel carriers
RS only used w/ RS wheel carriers

additionally, each is mounted on a different side of its wheel carrier

There are 3 different inners, any of which can be used w/ either of the above outers
stock w/ a rubber connection to the outer
RS w/ a stiffer rubber connection to the outer
RSR(Tarret) w/ a mono-ball connection to the outer

The Porsche motorsports RSR is NLA, so Tarrett is the way to go

best i've used is RS wheel carriers, RS outer RSR inner
What about these outers: https://tarett.com/products/front-ti...93-964-gt2-evo
Old 01-06-2023, 02:11 PM
  #12  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 559 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hootie
Those are optional for either std or RS wheel carriers

the o/s outers basically do what the RS wheel carriers alone do, ie compensate steering geometry for lowered vehicles

In general if you have the RS wheel carriers and correct RS outers then you don't need the Tarett o/s outers

my car runs at RSR height , 94/98 w/ RS RS and RSR for the wheel carrier to inner tie rod and never felt the need for the o/s outers

but a friend running the same height swears that they are needed, he was willing to spend way more time on it than I was as you need to do a bump sweep w/ dummy shocks to zero it all in, otherwise you run the risk of making things worse

The issue that all these parts are trying to cure is the geometry that leads to bump aka roll steer, This can never be eliminated just mitigated to the point that it isn't an issue for you

similarly in back a very low car will want geometry correction by using solid side mounts, there is no hard # that I can use to say when this is necessary, just go by your seat of the pants there

When I had a full RS stiff rubber suspension at the low end of RS for height I didn't feel the need for the solid sides or rear toe mono *****, when the car was spec'd w/ all mono-ball and dropped to RSR height I did

Old 01-06-2023, 02:47 PM
  #13  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
Those are optional for either std or RS wheel carriers

the o/s outers basically do what the RS wheel carriers alone do, ie compensate steering geometry for lowered vehicles

In general if you have the RS wheel carriers and correct RS outers then you don't need the Tarett o/s outers

my car runs at RSR height , 94/98 w/ RS RS and RSR for the wheel carrier to inner tie rod and never felt the need for the o/s outers

but a friend running the same height swears that they are needed, he was willing to spend way more time on it than I was as you need to do a bump sweep w/ dummy shocks to zero it all in, otherwise you run the risk of making things worse

The issue that all these parts are trying to cure is the geometry that leads to bump aka roll steer, This can never be eliminated just mitigated to the point that it isn't an issue for you

similarly in back a very low car will want geometry correction by using solid side mounts, there is no hard # that I can use to say when this is necessary, just go by your seat of the pants there

When I had a full RS stiff rubber suspension at the low end of RS for height I didn't feel the need for the solid sides or rear toe mono *****, when the car was spec'd w/ all mono-ball and dropped to RSR height I did
Very helpful as always. Do you know of a place to buy just the RS outer tie rod to then be paired with the RSR inner from Tarett?

Prekom is the only manufacturer I could find, but for some reason feels sketchy: https://www.prekom-usa.com/product/9...-rod-assembly/
Old 01-06-2023, 04:30 PM
  #14  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 559 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hootie
Very helpful as always. Do you know of a place to buy just the RS outer tie rod to then be paired with the RSR inner from Tarett?

Prekom is the only manufacturer I could find, but for some reason feels sketchy: https://www.prekom-usa.com/product/9...-rod-assembly/
The pic shows the correct RS outer and the correct RSR inner, I'd want to check to be sure the pic is accurate

the upper here is stock outer and inner, RS inner will look the same as the stock inner, the rubber in the connector is just stiffer
lower is RS outer and RSR inner

The following users liked this post:
silverlock (01-06-2023)
Old 01-20-2023, 05:29 PM
  #15  
hootie
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
hootie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 124
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Ok. After more thought, this is my final list:
  • BBi uprights (Nothing wrong with my RS uprights, but got enamored by the better suspension travel and bumpsteer - will be selling my RS uprights)
  • New upright bearings
  • RSR inner tie rods with RS outer tie rods
  • New front ball joints
  • Elephant Racing rear solid subframe mounts
  • New rear RS A arms
  • New rear RS KT arms
  • RoW 993 Turbo anti-roll bars (22mm/21mm)
  • New front/rear anti-roll bar bushings
  • Adjust height and alignment

Will I need any new hardware for the above changes? Rear subframe mount bolts? Anything else?
The following users liked this post:
silverlock (01-20-2023)


Quick Reply: Another Suspension Build Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:14 AM.