Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Solid or Rubber Subframe Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2019, 04:20 PM
  #91  
k722070
Three Wheelin'
 
k722070's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V
@Bill Verburg

I just installed the tilt kit from Rennline and even before reading this I started having second thoughts. Why? Because the subframe is tilted in a way that the original bolts on the front side that holds the subframe mounts to the chassis are coming in at an angle different to the threaded section in the chassis to which they are supposed to go in. I hope that makes sense. This means that they don't bolt up properly and you get the weird feeling that the thread is going to give when applying clamp force. Is this really how it's supposed to be? There is no mention of this in the installation instructions. It's goes without saying that if you tilt the subframe without tilting the chassis where the subframe attaches to, the angle on the bolt will be wrong. How did they solve this for the 993 GT2? I have a turbo car (and then some) so HP-wise the tilt kit makes sense. I am still hesitant and I'm thinking just to go back to solid flat ones and call it a day. Would you go flat even for a turbo? I also looked at that picture but I can't recall if I did put the subframe mounting point underneath like that, will have to check again. Any advice much appreciated.
if you have the rennline version the spacers and bushings will be shaped like a beveled washer to square up the subframe as it pulls to the tub.
it will only be as you are torquing the bolts that the washer/bolt deals with the angle.
still, if you don't like the process go with flat bushings.
hard to imagine tilt kit or flat will make noticeable difference for 95% of driving.
if you are just trying out the tilt kit to see if it makes a difference, damaging the threads isn't a big deal.
they are easily accessed for installing an m12 time-sert.
Old 07-30-2019, 10:14 PM
  #92  
MarinS4
Rennlist Member
 
MarinS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Received 169 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tlaloc75
Having driven both on the street, I would go with rs hardness rubber bushings. And in fact, that’s what I did!
Would love to hear you elaborate more on this. I went solid and have zero regrets. I struggle to notice a NVH difference yet the chassis just seemed more responsive with em. One of the few mods without a downside IMHO.
Old 07-30-2019, 11:56 PM
  #93  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarinS4
Would love to hear you elaborate more on this. I went solid and have zero regrets. I struggle to notice a NVH difference yet the chassis just seemed more responsive with em. One of the few mods without a downside IMHO.
I didn’t find anything wrong with the solid bushings, to the contrary I couldn’t feel a difference between them and RS bushings - both felt great. So in my thinking, I’d rather stick with the solution that is closer to the original design philosophy. But honestly, I don’t think you can go wrong with either. You in particular have quite a bit more hp than stock, so you may be better served with solid. But in a car with a stock, normally aspirated engine RS bushings work really well.

More detailed thoughts here: https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...monoballs.html
Old 07-31-2019, 08:36 PM
  #94  
MarinS4
Rennlist Member
 
MarinS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,443
Received 169 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tlaloc75
I didn’t find anything wrong with the solid bushings, to the contrary I couldn’t feel a difference between them and RS bushings - both felt great. So in my thinking, I’d rather stick with the solution that is closer to the original design philosophy. But honestly, I don’t think you can go wrong with either. You in particular have quite a bit more hp than stock, so you may be better served with solid. But in a car with a stock, normally aspirated engine RS bushings work really well.
It seems the original design philosophy was more grand touring than sports car. Just look at the inner front tie rod. Who’s idea was it to create such a rubber joint? The 993 was the first 911 to employ a rear sub frame and used rubber bushings. On the following models the GT3 used solid mounts and the rest used rubber. What you choose on the 993 should be dictated by your desires for a more sporting feel like GT3 or sticking with OEM grand touring style. The lower power level of the NA is not a determining factor IMHO.

Just another example of how we all salt the 993 to our own tastes.

Last edited by MarinS4; 07-31-2019 at 09:17 PM.
Old 07-31-2019, 09:37 PM
  #95  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarinS4
It seems the original design philosophy was more grand touring than sports car. Just look at the inner front tie rod. Who’s idea was it to create such a rubber joint? The 993 was the first 911 to employ a rear sub frame and used rubber bushings. On the following models the GT3 used solid mounts and the rest used rubber. What you choose on the 993 should be dictated by your desires for a more sporting feel like GT3 or sticking with OEM grand touring style. The lower power level of the NA is not a determining factor IMHO.

Just another example of how we all salt the 993 to our own tastes.
Yeah, I think you could go either way and be very happy. The difference was honestly indistinguishable for me on the street. Which was a surprise - I thought I’d be able to sense some difference either in NVH or in handling.
Old 08-01-2019, 11:06 AM
  #96  
Top-Gun
Racer
 
Top-Gun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Does anyone make solid bushings that don't move the subframe closer to the tub? I.e. if one was running ROW sport height but still wanted to run solid bushings, is there a solution for this or are all these designed for lower ride heights?
Old 08-01-2019, 12:40 PM
  #97  
craina
Rennlist Member
 
craina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 464
Received 132 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Top-Gun
Does anyone make solid bushings that don't move the subframe closer to the tub? I.e. if one was running ROW sport height but still wanted to run solid bushings, is there a solution for this or are all these designed for lower ride heights?
Rennline
Old 12-10-2021, 12:10 AM
  #98  
kaaayelll
Rennlist Member
 
kaaayelll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 143
Received 59 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tlaloc75


The bolts are one time use stretch bolts, they should be replaced. The factory manual does a good job of marking which nits and bolts should be replaced when redoing the suspension.

Here is my list from when I did the work.

Suspension nuts and bolts

- Upper Mount Gasket for front shocks.

- 993-341-511-01 x2

- The lock nuts that are used to secure the shock top hats both front and rear suspension. 16 nuts total.

- 900-380-005-01 x16

- Nuts and Bolts for front control arm

- 999-084-445-01 x2

- 900-082-118-01 x2

- 900-082-137-01 x2

- The lock nuts and bolts that are used to attach the front shock to the wheel carrier.

- 999-067-039-01 x2

- 999-072-006-01 x2

- 993-343-156-00 x2

- The lock nuts that attach rear suspension control arms to the wheel carrier. 8 nuts total.

- 900-380-010-01 x2 (A-arm)

- 999-084-449-09 x6 (Toe arm, Camber arm, KT arm)

- The lock nuts that attach control arms to the subframe. 10 nuts total.

- 999-084-445-01 x6 (A arm trailing, camber arm, toe arm)

- 900-380-012-01 x2 (A arm leading)

- 999-507-384-09 x2 (KT arm)

- The lock nuts that attach subframe to car

- 999-084-445-01 x8 (rear attachment points)

- 900-380-008-01 x4 (forward attachment points)

- The bolts that hold subframe onto car

- 999-072-003-09 x4 (through the bushings on each side)

- 900-378-021-01 x4 (small forward bolts)

- 900-378-061-01 x4 (50mm bottom 2 rear bolt positions)

- 900-378-052-09 x2 (80mm top rear bolts)

- 900-378-049-09 x2 (60mm second from top rear bolts)

This is I incredibly helpful, thank you.

1) Are the following typically supplied with coilovers?

- Upper Mount Gasket for front shocks
- The lock nuts that are used to secure the shock top hats both front and rear suspension. 16 nuts total.

2) Are the following typically supplied with new arms?

- The lock nuts that attach rear suspension control arms to the wheel carrier.

- The lock nuts that attach control arms to the subframe.

3) Are any of the following not needed if only the subframe bushings are being replaced (without removal of the subframe)?

- The lock nuts that attach subframe to car

- 999-084-445-01 x8 (rear attachment points)

- 900-380-008-01 x4 (forward attachment points)

- The bolts that hold subframe onto car

- 999-072-003-09 x4 (through the bushings on each side)

- 900-378-021-01 x4 (small forward bolts)

- 900-378-061-01 x4 (50mm bottom 2 rear bolt positions)

- 900-378-052-09 x2 (80mm top rear bolts)

- 900-378-049-09 x2 (60mm second from top rear bolts)

3) Should any nuts and bolts not listed be replaced?

- The bolts attaching the hubs to the uprights if the hubs are being swapped or removed?
Old 12-10-2021, 10:31 AM
  #99  
Tlaloc75
Three Wheelin'
 
Tlaloc75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,983
Received 147 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaaayelll
This is I incredibly helpful, thank you.

1) Are the following typically supplied with coilovers?

- Upper Mount Gasket for front shocks
- The lock nuts that are used to secure the shock top hats both front and rear suspension. 16 nuts total.

2) Are the following typically supplied with new arms?

- The lock nuts that attach rear suspension control arms to the wheel carrier.

- The lock nuts that attach control arms to the subframe.

3) Are any of the following not needed if only the subframe bushings are being replaced (without removal of the subframe)?

- The lock nuts that attach subframe to car

- 999-084-445-01 x8 (rear attachment points)

- 900-380-008-01 x4 (forward attachment points)

- The bolts that hold subframe onto car

- 999-072-003-09 x4 (through the bushings on each side)

- 900-378-021-01 x4 (small forward bolts)

- 900-378-061-01 x4 (50mm bottom 2 rear bolt positions)

- 900-378-052-09 x2 (80mm top rear bolts)

- 900-378-049-09 x2 (60mm second from top rear bolts)

3) Should any nuts and bolts not listed be replaced?

- The bolts attaching the hubs to the uprights if the hubs are being swapped or removed?
1) I needed to buy these separately.
2) I needed to buy these separately.
3) You must remove the subframe (or at least loosen it) to replace the bushings. You'll need all of these.
4) Attachment points are at the shock and the a-arm so the nuts and bolts listed above should do it.
Old 12-10-2021, 10:41 AM
  #100  
kaaayelll
Rennlist Member
 
kaaayelll's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 143
Received 59 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Awesome, thanks!!



Quick Reply: Solid or Rubber Subframe Mounts



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:28 AM.