Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The new 992.2 GTS faster than the 992.1 in 8.7 Seconds at Nürburgring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2024, 05:06 PM
  #76  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,565
Received 5,005 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aggie57
Maybe 911 and even some Boxster/Cayman buyers care but others? Hell, even repeat 911 buyers get jaded at the whole 'ring time thing eventually. The marketing types in Stuttgart love it of course because it's a 'fact' they can use to validate and justify the new model. Otherwise, pretty much means nada.
How are ring times promoted?
Mostly, via press release.
They don't plaster that number or its significance in any promotional material.
That should tell you who the information is for.

In a world where you can't test drive before ordering, knowing that a 992 C2S is 7 seconds faster than a 997.2 3RS gives people who care or know, some kind of context beyond reading 0-60 or 1/4 mile times. In a way, it matters more than reviews by pundits. Not because you'll need to drive it at the Ring but because when people buy something, some buy potential.
The following users liked this post:
user 999993337 (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 05:10 PM
  #77  
jdrake
Rennlist Member
 
jdrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Carrollton, TX
Posts: 186
Received 70 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pal
Regarding Ring times, I look at the times more as a comparative performance number, for a car's handling and pace, to get a sense for how the current generation of car X, compares to the previous generation. It's useful, but not even close to being sufficient, for the facts I consider for buying a car. Without Ring times, the only comparative number we'd have are straight line speeds, that are even less interesting.
Well said. What better way to compare each successive iteration of a new model than to put it through its paces on a track that exemplifies most every type of road handling condition over an extended period of lap time? This results in an empirical measure that this particular test is designed to provide. Porsche is not claiming a better "experience" when doing Ring laps. They are simply saying that this new model compares favorably/unfavorably to all their other models and years. The 992.2 lap times dispels the rumors that the additional weight results in a slower car - empirical evidence. As far as experience goes, there are other driving tests and opinions as these are more subjective.
Old 05-13-2024, 05:15 PM
  #78  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,565
Received 5,005 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nyca
Weight is about more than speed, its about the way the car feels to drive. You can always overcome more weight with more HP.
Alois Ruf said it best: “It seems nobody understands any more that you cannot compensate for weight through horsepower. I’m just a guy who likes driving at 300km/h. For me, the driving feel is important; a car should feel like a part of my clothing, like my jeans. Performance is everywhere. It’s in the suspension, the brakes, the steering feel, not just in the engine.”

The following 2 users liked this post by Wilder:
Oileater (05-13-2024), Tedster (05-23-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 05:52 PM
  #79  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 351
Received 204 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silversurfer6
The weight increase though could be less, maybe even 130 pounds. This is speculation on my part, I do not have a figure.
Articles have state 55-60lbs extra. Not 130-200.
Old 05-13-2024, 05:55 PM
  #80  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 351
Received 204 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shrimp money
If the 992.2 Turbo is rear wheel drive and manual, Sport Classic owners gonna be mad.

“It’s basically a Sport Classic”
And 20,000 other owners will be HAPPY.

A Turbo Manual RWD will keep me very very happy. A Turbo RWD Manual will make much more sense paired up to a AWD Turbo S PDK. Perfect combo to offer.
The following users liked this post:
alaris (05-14-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 05:56 PM
  #81  
kayjh
Drifting
 
kayjh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,610
Received 708 Likes on 494 Posts
Default

This thread is the same as every one in the past when a new generation or .2 version comes out. Yet Porsche's sales numbers seem to keep going up with each generation. I think Porsche is selling more water cooled 911's compared to the air cooled models it replaced. I'm betting there were many posts by people saying they would never buy a water cooled Porsche.

I'm excited about the prospect of a better driving 911. That is what Porsche says it strives to deliver with each new model generation. So, I'll wait and see what the new car drives like . If I like it, I'll get one (performance hybrid or not). I have no prejudice regarding hybrid.
The following 4 users liked this post by kayjh:
AlfaM5 (05-13-2024), Haros (05-13-2024), impinth06 (05-14-2024), mashoutposse (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 05:59 PM
  #82  
adrianp89
Pro
 
adrianp89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 547
Received 421 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
How are ring times promoted?
Mostly, via press release.
They don't plaster that number or its significance in any promotional material.
That should tell you who the information is for.

In a world where you can't test drive before ordering, knowing that a 992 C2S is 7 seconds faster than a 997.2 3RS gives people who care or know, some kind of context beyond reading 0-60 or 1/4 mile times. In a way, it matters more than reviews by pundits. Not because you'll need to drive it at the Ring but because when people buy something, some buy potential.
I am curious how much modern tires make a difference. Would the tire technology of 2024 make a 7 second difference from tires in 2010?
Old 05-13-2024, 06:14 PM
  #83  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,565
Received 5,005 Likes on 1,777 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adrianp89
I am curious how much modern tires make a difference. Would the tire technology of 2024 make a 7 second difference from tires in 2010?
Huge and yes, absolutely.
A 2010 3RS with Cup2s would be much faster today than the 7.33 time it set on the original tires.
The following users liked this post:
adrianp89 (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 06:30 PM
  #84  
silversurfer6
Rennlist Member
 
silversurfer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 1,027
Received 661 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
Huge and yes, absolutely.
A 2010 3RS with Cup2s would be much faster today than the 7.33 time it set on the original tires.
Regarding tyres the test cars were using P Zero R which probably is what they used at the ring - even though I suspect they used cup 2
Old 05-13-2024, 06:48 PM
  #85  
CM991
Rennlist Member
 
CM991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 351
Received 204 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DocM
If they make it, I'll be in line to buy it.
If they make that it'll probably get very close to the GT3 Touring Manual orders.
It'll definitely be my next car.
Old 05-13-2024, 06:59 PM
  #86  
zachr
Burning Brakes
 
zachr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: ATL
Posts: 803
Received 746 Likes on 333 Posts
Default

One small detail from the press release: "The test car was equipped with standard road tyres, plus the aero kit with a fixed rear wing that has been available as an option for several model generations now, and which provides increased downforce at high speeds."

Aerokit brethren, rejoice – it's confirmed functional! Now tell us how much downforce it makes, cowards!


edit: i see I'm late to this and @Defrag caught it already. Oops. That's what I get for not reading the thread first...

Last edited by zachr; 05-13-2024 at 07:04 PM.
The following users liked this post:
shrimp money (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 07:24 PM
  #87  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,959
Likes: 0
Received 11,657 Likes on 5,110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pal
Regarding Ring times, I look at the times more as a comparative performance number, for a car's handling and pace, to get a sense for how the current generation of car X, compares to the previous generation. It's useful, but not even close to being sufficient, for the facts I consider for buying a car. Without Ring times, the only comparative number we'd have are straight line speeds, that are even less interesting.
I would agree with this in theory.

But in practice, it's not as clear cut. Between tire technology and re-pavement of the Ring, comparisons between historical Ring times are about as relevant as comparing the price of gasoline today to what it was 10 years ago, without accounting for inflation, which is what people do when they talk about Ring times.
Old 05-13-2024, 08:02 PM
  #88  
22992
Burning Brakes
 
22992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,048
Received 800 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zachr
One small detail from the press release: "The test car was equipped with standard road tyres, plus the aero kit with a fixed rear wing that has been available as an option for several model generations now, and which provides increased downforce at high speeds."

Aerokit brethren, rejoice – it's confirmed functional! Now tell us how much downforce it makes, cowards!


edit: i see I'm late to this and @Defrag caught it already. Oops. That's what I get for not reading the thread first...
Haha..they have always marketed a change in aero with the 992’aerokit. With the .1 the official line was “a reduction in up force” suggesting the car was either neutral or still had some lift, but less lift than the standard pop up. With this model, they may be taking the Carrera lineup into the downforce territory, hence the change in verbiage
Old 05-13-2024, 08:23 PM
  #89  
1stCayman
Intermediate
 
1stCayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 34
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Media will drive the new GTS in June
Old 05-13-2024, 08:31 PM
  #90  
aggie57
Rennlist Member
 
aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,321
Received 2,865 Likes on 1,508 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
How are ring times promoted?
Mostly, via press release.
They don't plaster that number or its significance in any promotional material.
That should tell you who the information is for.

In a world where you can't test drive before ordering, knowing that a 992 C2S is 7 seconds faster than a 997.2 3RS gives people who care or know, some kind of context beyond reading 0-60 or 1/4 mile times. In a way, it matters more than reviews by pundits. Not because you'll need to drive it at the Ring but because when people buy something, some buy potential.
I reckon about .1% of Porsche buyers actually care. To me 0-60 times are in the same camp, meh. Anything less than 5 seconds is in the quick camp, of limited relevance in 'the real world'.


Quick Reply: The new 992.2 GTS faster than the 992.1 in 8.7 Seconds at Nürburgring



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:20 AM.