Porsche & Real Estate
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Porsche & Real Estate
In this forum, there are Porsches in the wild, at gas stations, at racetracks, etc. but I do not see them in front of houses. My first passion is a 911, 2nd is real estate. So here's a GTS with a house behind it. Feel free to post yours.
#2
LOL.
#3
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
As someone that cares about security and privacy, I won’t be posting a picture of my house with my car. So, here’s a picture of my 992C4S parked outside of a bungalow that I rented on AirBNB.
I seriously don’t recommend posting pictures of where your car actually lives, especially on a public forum.
I seriously don’t recommend posting pictures of where your car actually lives, especially on a public forum.
#5
Race Car
Do you want the garage code, too?
The following 2 users liked this post by shrimp money:
detansinn (04-15-2024),
Jeff Whitten (04-16-2024)
The following users liked this post:
RG88 (04-16-2024)
#7
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Trending Topics
#8
oh I know. Too bad it is not in Atherton and be $10mm. There is a reason I said bye to Bay Area…
granted we just had a house a few blocks away go for $14.3mm
A nice little house
granted we just had a house a few blocks away go for $14.3mm
A nice little house
Last edited by 992gts; 04-15-2024 at 11:11 PM.
The following users liked this post:
detansinn (04-15-2024)
#9
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#10
Burning Brakes
Wow you folks are paranoid. As if a picture of a house tells you where it is? And as if anyone gives a ****.
Furthermore, I don't think the OP mentioned anywhere to post a 992 in front of YOUR house. He said A house.
Furthermore, I don't think the OP mentioned anywhere to post a 992 in front of YOUR house. He said A house.
The following 4 users liked this post by Fishah:
#13
What's crazy is that $5 million dollar shack in Palo Alto, if transferred to a new owner at that price point, obligates the new home "owner" to pay at least $55,000 per year on property taxes alone. That is before any maintenance, mortgage principal & interest, and HOA fees. I don't consider that a home ownership. The county and the state own the home, and you are paying them $55K in rent every year, plus 2%+ increases per year. If you don't pay it, they will take over your house via tax lien.
In three years, the property tax on that $5 million dollar house alone pays for a brand-new Carrera T in cash. This is why I think buying a house in the Bay Area is plain stupid from financial standpoint, unless you lived in it for 30+ years and the property tax is not re-adjusted to the current transaction levels.
In three years, the property tax on that $5 million dollar house alone pays for a brand-new Carrera T in cash. This is why I think buying a house in the Bay Area is plain stupid from financial standpoint, unless you lived in it for 30+ years and the property tax is not re-adjusted to the current transaction levels.
Last edited by double-o-seven; 04-16-2024 at 02:36 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by double-o-seven:
#14
What's crazy is that $5 million dollar shack in Palo Alto, if transferred to a new owner at that price point, obligates the new home "owner" to pay at least $55,000 per year on property taxes alone. That is before any maintenance, mortgage principal & interest, and HOA fees. I don't consider that a home ownership. The county and the state own the home, and you are paying $55K in rent to them every year, plus 2%+ increases per year. If you don't pay it, they will take over your house via tax lien.
In three years, the property tax on that $5 million dollar house alone pays for a brand-new Carrera T in cash. This is why I think buying a house in the Bay Area is plain stupid from financial standpoint, unless you lived in it for 30+ years and the property tax is not re-adjusted to the current transaction levels.
In three years, the property tax on that $5 million dollar house alone pays for a brand-new Carrera T in cash. This is why I think buying a house in the Bay Area is plain stupid from financial standpoint, unless you lived in it for 30+ years and the property tax is not re-adjusted to the current transaction levels.
#15
As long as the tenant's rent covers all expenses comfortably, including property tax, maintenance, and HOA fees, there's nothing wrong with having investment properties in the Bay Area, if one is okay with earthquake risks. However, I think the math is getting much harder for new "mom & pop" type rental property buyers in the SF Bay Area.