When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Bottom line is notwithstanding the poor exhaust manifold design on the 991,2:, the 992 redesign fixed it. On the 992 you get more bang for your buck with Sport Cats, exhaust and tune than spending $ on headers because of the redesign
On the 992, the headers were made significantly better compared to the 991.2, but still room for improvement I don't disagree about sport cats and a tune providing more bang for the buck. Stock ones for reference.
When Formula1 entered the turbo V6 hybrid era, Mercedes actually started with a log manifold. Easy, reliable, and there was tons of other stuff to spend time figuring out. If any of you recall the first practice session of the first year of the current engine era, most of the teams didn't even make it one lap around the track.
Of course, once all the complexities of the controls required to make everything work together, Mercedes spent the time to design and develop a proper tubular header.
I had vector performance headers on my Carrera T and full Akrapovic cats and pipe. Until I adjusted the tune to work with the headers it only helped a little In the top part of the power band. Changing from a standard log manifold to tubes increases air flow Deffo. Look into it as I am sure a lot companies can give you advise In that area.
matt
Yeah, modern ecus are designed to hit torque targets as their control strategy to give the same performance across as wide a range of environmental conditions as possible. Old school ECUs hit boost targets. It seems most cars have low-end targets that the stock hardware can't actually hit. But then you throw in better breathing mods like sport cats and headers and then the car can. With the better exhaust flow breathing mods, you'll always get the quicker spool-up and response regardless. Here's a link showing this exactly, dyno of the europipe sport cats. Big gains down low and then basically nothing up top because the ECU has adjusted. It seems the 992 ecu is a bit better at calculating torque than the older 991.2 ecu which usually still saw some small gains at the top with exhaust breathing mods. But to get real power, you need a tune to adjust those torque targets in the ecu.
Thanks. Unsure of value of comparing a 992 flat boxer production engine with factory exhaust to a Formula 1 Mercedes V6 racing engine without factory cats or exhaust. But, I do trust the opinion of John Gaydos of SoulPerformance. He is an expert in the field who designs and sells headers as well as many other excellent exhaust products. The only dyno runs I am interested in are those comparing a 992 with factory exhaust and turbos to a 992 with factory turbos but with aftermarket headers. See Brosef’s comment in post 5 above. Now, I have seen those dyno runs for the 991.2 but not the 992. I assume there is a reason for that. John says there is little room for improvement over the 992 factory exhaust manifold until you upgrade the factory turbos….and one of the exhaust products he sells is 992 headers. John has most credible opinion on this issue IMHO.
Last edited by Fullyield; Sep 10, 2022 at 02:52 PM.
When Formula1 entered the turbo V6 hybrid era, Mercedes actually started with a log manifold. Easy, reliable, and there was tons of other stuff to spend time figuring out. If any of you recall the first practice session of the first year of the current engine era, most of the teams didn't even make it one lap around the track.
Of course, once all the complexities of the controls required to make everything work together, Mercedes spent the time to design and develop a proper tubular header.
Im sure the log manifolds spool quicker. The shorter the path, the less volume in the exhaust manifold, the faster a turbo spools.
The BMW B58 has a variant where the turbo bolts directly to the cylinder head. They sacrifice 15 peak HP for torque that arrives 100rpm sooner.
This why Im surprised that Soul claims their headers (with larger and longer primaries) reduces lag. But, maybe theres some magic with the merge collector? Would love to see a dyno.
Anyways, I expect the real benefit of headers on a 992 is sound.
This why Im surprised that Soul claims their headers (with larger and longer primaries) reduces lag. But, maybe theres some magic with the merge collector? Would love to see a dyno.
Anyways, I expect the real benefit of headers on a 992 is sound.
There's a lot more to a proper manifold that just length of the flow paths Many companies went to manifolds integrated into the head for a number of reasons, but they kill high flow and therefore power. The mani integrated into the heads are basically log manifolds. They do save costs, weight, and reduce the time for engine warmup which reduces emissions and fuel consumption, all things OEMs like. But as everyone has seen on the B58 engine, the variant with a traditional head and exhaust manifold (non-integrated) has way more power potential.
If the 991.2 manifold is 0% and a proper max performance header is 100%, then the 992 log manifold is like 60%-70%. It's like going from an old steel wheel to a cast aluminum. But you can still go better with a forged aluminum, or baller magnesium.
Porsche 911 GT3 Artisan Edition Pays Homage to Japanese Culture
Slideshow: Porsche has created a Japan-only 911 GT3 Artisan Edition that blends track-ready hardware with design cues inspired by traditional Japanese craftsmanship.
Porsche Reveals Coupe Variant of the Electric Cayenne With a Fresh Look
Slideshow: Porsche's latest electric Cayenne Coupe blends dramatic styling with supercar acceleration, turning the brand's midsize SUV into a 1,139-horsepower flagship.