4 way vs 18 way
#76
#77
Actually there are a lot of differing views on PCCBs especially on a car that is tracked frequently. The AP stuff is very close in weight to PCCBs without the cost. There are quite a few Porsche track cars that take off their Carbon rotors and run steel on the track. I did a lot of research before my decision to go with aftermarket steel brakes.
I personally went with the for absolutely nothing to do with weight or performance... a) they look way cooler, and b) I HATE break dust.
#78
#79
#80
I assume you are speaking from experience? Come to Colorado and we will get you on the track for some driving fun..
The following users liked this post:
BrntRubber (06-15-2021)
#82
Actually there are a lot of differing views on PCCBs especially on a car that is tracked frequently. The AP stuff is very close in weight to PCCBs without the cost. There are quite a few Porsche track cars that take off their Carbon rotors and run steel on the track. I did a lot of research before my decision to go with aftermarket steel brakes.
#83
Whether the PCCBs are worth the cost is a matter of opinion that has been well debated for a decade. The weight savings, however, considering it is unsprung rotational weight, is more than minimal. I would be willing to wager that even a novice would notice a difference in otherwise-identical cars if driven back-to-back. And if a person is not able to notice, then definitely get the steels :-)
The following users liked this post:
992Sam (08-08-2020)
The following 3 users liked this post by smiles11:
#85
#86
the lifespan for me as a street driver exceeds the life of the car ... not to mention saving in new brake pads and rotors over the next 150,000 miles.
#87
Nice article in Oregon PCA.... Clearly outlines my thinking on the matter. Running in NASA TT, you appreciate experience over Google. But here is Google....
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/
#88
Nice article in Oregon PCA.... Clearly outlines my thinking on the matter. Running in NASA TT, you appreciate experience over Google. But here is Google....
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/
The following 2 users liked this post by markchristenson:
992Sam (08-08-2020),
inastrangeland (08-08-2020)
#89
Good article. I think a lot of conversations are people talking past each other. A person who doesn’t track his/her car and wants the look/exclusivity/performance/etc. will look at the choice much differently than a person who goes to the track 5, 10, 15 times/year. I am disappointed that PCCBs are not as indestructible as was implied when they first came out, but even then the intent may have been aimed at folks who won’t track their cars. But not so disappointed that I didn’t spec them :-)
A purchase of a car like this is mostly an emotional decision (a marketers dream car)... to sit here and talk about logical reasons, and GASP financial reasons to skimp on this or add that is pointless... We all order our cars a certain way for a reason, it emotionally works for us.. necessity and utility has VERY little to do with the entire exercise... Frankly even though I spent north of $180K for this car (a lot for a C4S), my only regret is not spending the $2000 more for front axle lift!
The following 2 users liked this post by 992Sam:
AlexCeres (12-05-2020),
markchristenson (08-08-2020)
#90
Nice article in Oregon PCA.... Clearly outlines my thinking on the matter. Running in NASA TT, you appreciate experience over Google. But here is Google....
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/
https://www.oregonpca.org/porsche-traction-in-winter-2/