Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Getawayer review. He's back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2020 | 04:35 PM
  #31  
HouTexCarreraS's Avatar
HouTexCarreraS
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 654
Likes: 408
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Jkb545
Most journalist evaluations seem to be on the S with sport package. After doing some comparisons, I will probably take a S without SPASM. The consensus though on this forum is that the appearance is superior with SPASM. I have to test drive an S without SPASM - it might be more comfortable - daily driver.
I decided on the S without SPASM since I wanted a more comfortable DD with a higher ride height for clearing curbs and wheel stops.
The following users liked this post:
SamD (02-19-2020)
Old 02-19-2020 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
gcurnew's Avatar
gcurnew
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 1,640
From: Calgary, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Sam Dickson
SPASM is not standard on the S
No it's not, but the car he tested had SPASM...lowered ride hight was fairly obvious, but the extended front lip was the dead giveaway.

Last edited by gcurnew; 02-19-2020 at 05:47 PM.
Old 02-19-2020 | 04:42 PM
  #33  
Jkb545's Avatar
Jkb545
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 424
Likes: 221
Default

Originally Posted by HouTexCarreraS
I decided on the S without SPASM since I wanted a more comfortable DD with a higher ride height for clearing curbs and wheel stops.
I’d love to see pics of your S without SPASM. Are they on some thread in the forum? What did you think of comfort and tire noise compared to the S with SPASM?
Old 02-19-2020 | 04:48 PM
  #34  
GratedWasabi's Avatar
GratedWasabi
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 364
Likes: 312
Default

Originally Posted by Jkb545
I’d love to see pics of your S without SPASM. Are they on some thread in the forum? What did you think of comfort and tire noise compared to the S with SPASM?
I can tell you from driving a C2 and C2S w/
Spasm (same tires) back to back that Pasm alone is more comfortable and potentially a little quieter (although the noise could be attributed to various factors and tires will be the most significant).

The Pasm doesn't feel as sporty, though, so there is a definite tradeoff. Pretty much just what you'd expect.
The following users liked this post:
gcurnew (02-19-2020)
Old 02-19-2020 | 05:00 PM
  #35  
HouTexCarreraS's Avatar
HouTexCarreraS
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 654
Likes: 408
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Jkb545
I’d love to see pics of your S without SPASM. Are they on some thread in the forum? What did you think of comfort and tire noise compared to the S with SPASM?
I'm still waiting on the car to arrive--it's currently in Jacksonville and will be in Houston at my dealer in about 2 weeks. There are a lot of pictures of S models without SPASM on the forum--just look for ones without the extended front lip.

​​​​​​​
Old 02-20-2020 | 11:12 AM
  #36  
subwoofer's Avatar
subwoofer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 640
From: NH/FL
Default

Guido Komp made similar comments when he reviewed the 991.2 GTS. Clearly, he is not a fan of the turbo sixes. I found some his observations and comments to be spot on. The turbo six in my 991.2 4S does build power in a linear way (as noted in the review) but is a little laggy below 3k rpms and doesn't produce the same drama at high rpms as the 3.4 L in my previous car. There seems no point taking it to redline. The heart of a sports car is indeed the engine and when there is no drama, is it still fun to drive? There is the speed but it is hard to exploit in any meaningful way on public roads as mentioned in the review. The new 992 is even faster of course. Guido mentions how, with the NA sixes, engine noise would fill the cabin. Now, I find that tire roar fills the cabin and the engine is in the background regardless of the pops and crackles. Of course the GT3 sounds wonderful but it is out of reach for many including me even if an allocation was available.

Last edited by subwoofer; 02-20-2020 at 01:15 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by subwoofer:
ddolbi (02-20-2020), NigelPlays (02-20-2020), SamD (02-20-2020)
Old 02-20-2020 | 11:50 AM
  #37  
clutchplate's Avatar
clutchplate
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 975
From: A far away galaxy, CA
Default

Will be interesting to see if the 4.0 NA engines in the GT4, Spyder and 718 GTS generate an increase of sales or if after the purists buy theirs sales become stagnant. I'm definitely leaning that way simply because of their engines. 2019 911 sales are down slightly compared to 2018 so no matter what you think of the 992 buyers appear to be cautious, at least so far. Of course 2020 could change that as more 992 models are made. The only Porsche with a notable year over year increase is the Cayenne which is probably because its gross weight exceeds 6,000 lbs and self employed folks are buying to get the section 179 $25,000 deduction.



Quick Reply: Getawayer review. He's back



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:31 PM.