Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992 is not a real 911

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2018, 11:58 PM
  #31  
Freddie Two Bs
Drifting
 
Freddie Two Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,256
Received 462 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Argon_
Oh, add wheelbase as an additional stat. The 964-991 wheelbase stays pretty similar.
Nope. 89.4 inches to 96.5 inches. That's a substantial increase. While it had only increased 2 inches from 1965-1973 to 964, if I googled the right sources.
Old 04-08-2018, 01:48 AM
  #32  
FrenchToast
Three Wheelin'
 
FrenchToast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rick brooklyn
Nope. 89.4 inches to 96.5 inches. That's a substantial increase. While it had only increased 2 inches from 1965-1973 to 964, if I googled the right sources.
The first cars are 87", 901 thru MY68. It then increased to 89.4" to improve stability. It stayed at 89.4" thru the 993 (it did move small fractions with each new suspension design). The 996 went to 92.6", 991 went to 96.5", don't know the 992.

The 996 is an increase, but it looks even longer due to the shorter overhang.
Old 04-08-2018, 08:42 AM
  #33  
dribar
Racer
 
dribar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sarasota, FL USA
Posts: 338
Received 202 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Can’t wait to get mine. As soon as I can order one, it’s happening.
Old 04-09-2018, 06:59 PM
  #34  
mb1
Rennlist Member
 
mb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,088
Received 197 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by manitou202
964 - base 911
Width: 65in
Height: 52in
Length: 168.3in
Weight: 3,031 lbs

991.1 - base 911
Width: 71.2in
Height: 51.3in
Length: 176.8in
Weight: 3,164 lbs
1995 928 GTS
Width: 72.3 in
Height: 50.5 in
Length: 178.1 in
Weight: 3594 lbs

Not judging (I have and enjoy my 991), but I used to think of the 928 as a huge GT when I saw them driving around town in the late 80's and early 90's.
Old 04-10-2018, 11:22 AM
  #35  
tstafford
Race Car
 
tstafford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,483
Received 1,083 Likes on 621 Posts
Default

I enjoy my 991. As I've aged my tolerance for discomfort has gone down tremendously. I like the mixture of performance and comfort a ton. It's a very capable performance car - I track it regularly. And it's enjoyable to drive to/from the track as well.
Old 04-10-2018, 01:15 PM
  #36  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raven 666
dont get me wrong I love the new cars also ,,,but can see how many people feel the 911 has got to large .....
Typical when a sports car is transitioned into a Gran Touring automobile .

They should have just renamed the 911 line "928" when the 996 was introduced.

Originally Posted by mb1
1995 928 GTS
Width: 72.3 in
Height: 50.5 in
Length: 178.1 in
Weight: 3594 lbs

Not judging (I have and enjoy my 991), but I used to think of the 928 as a huge GT when I saw them driving around town in the late 80's and early 90's.
Exactly!!

Porsche new the future of their top tier car was going to be a GT, they were three decades ahead of the market!! With the introduction of the Boxster taking the role of Porsche's minimalist sports car, the 911 was transformed into a GT the 928 used to be.

I don't understand why this topic ruffles so many feathers, it doesn't make the 911 any less of an awesome car. I just cannot wrap my head around something weighing 3,600lbs, AWD, similar creature comforts as an S-Class....as a "sports car".
Old 04-12-2018, 10:30 PM
  #37  
chuck911
Race Car
 
chuck911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I've been reading about the 911 since about 1973. From 1973 up through around 2005 or so I'm sure I read everything R&T wrote, road tests or otherwise, and probably the majority of everything else in print as well. Once the internet exploded all bets are off. But based on print at least I have a hard time remembering the 911 ever being classed as a sports car. The only real question mark would be the occasional debate over calling it Sport/GT or GT/Sport. But nobody (of any substance) ever referred to it as a sports car. Or GT. It simply never has fit into either category. Which, of course. The 911 has always been in a class of its own.

What is a real 911? You won't like the answer. But the market has spoken. Porsche has listened. The answer is as obvious as the nose on your face. A real 911 can be air or water cooled. A real 911 can be natural or forced induction. A real 911 can be manual or PDK. A real 911 can even have the engine in front of the rear axle. And a real 911 can even be hybrid, which shockingly calls the whole flat-six convention into question. (Which, come to think of it, not even news. Porsche is on record saying they can make a 911 - presumably a real 911 - run on batteries.) A real 911 can be sheet metal, composite, plastic, RWD, AWD, analog or computerized, stripped and roll-caged or full-leather climatized. The one thing we know for sure a real 911 can NOT be is a car with anything other than round headlights. That is the lesson Porsche learned with the 996. Learned it so well that every model since has been defined by the shape of its headlights. A hundred years ago it was radiators. Today, with Porsche anyway, its headlights.
Old 04-13-2018, 01:08 AM
  #38  
captainkirk
Pro
 
captainkirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Somewhere in Space....the final frontier
Posts: 734
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
...The one thing we know for sure a real 911 can NOT be is a car with anything other than round headlights. That is the lesson Porsche learned with the 996. Learned it so well that every model since has been defined by the shape of its headlights. A hundred years ago it was radiators. Today, with Porsche anyway, its headlights.
I have to admit that is how i exactly feel, I could never imagine the headlights being changed, I was loss of words when the 996 models got released. I still to this day have a hard time buying any used 996 designs (and yes, they have deals on these models). I can live with the power-plant changes and what not, as long as I get the feedback of a 911, and gotta have the round headlights.

I am a sucker for the 911 look, can't help it.
Old 04-13-2018, 03:48 AM
  #39  
simplex
Instructor
 
simplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
I've been reading about the 911 since about 1973. From 1973 up through around 2005 or so I'm sure I read everything R&T wrote, road tests or otherwise, and probably the majority of everything else in print as well. Once the internet exploded all bets are off. But based on print at least I have a hard time remembering the 911 ever being classed as a sports car. The only real question mark would be the occasional debate over calling it Sport/GT or GT/Sport. But nobody (of any substance) ever referred to it as a sports car.
In the above, if you had said 'Carrera' instead of the '911', then I could agree. But the 911 GT3 and GT2 models are definitely sports cars.
Old 04-13-2018, 11:36 AM
  #40  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,559
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Everybody knows real sports cars should have side curtains and tops stored in the boot. Porsche and Alpha Romeo screwed it all up with roll up windows and (optional) heaters.
Old 04-13-2018, 11:57 AM
  #41  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,116
Received 1,245 Likes on 782 Posts
Default

It will be interesting to compare the dimensions of the 992 to the previous cars. Lots of people talk about now the 991 is soooooo much bigger than the 997, but it's really not. If you look at the stats directly from porsche press kits comparing the 997.2 C2 to the 991.1 C2, you'll see that that 991 is 1.27 inches longer than the 997. It's the same width. The 991 is 0.70 inches lower than the 997, and it weighs 33 lbs. less than the 997.

So the 991 is definitely a little bit longer than the 997, but it's the same width, it's lower, and it weighs less. Does that make it "bigger"? Not really....

I suspect the 992 will be pretty comparable in size to the 991.
Old 04-13-2018, 01:37 PM
  #42  
Freddie Two Bs
Drifting
 
Freddie Two Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,256
Received 462 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by virage
In the above, if you had said 'Carrera' instead of the '911', then I could agree. But the 911 GT3 and GT2 models are definitely sports cars.
Maybe he's British. In England "sports car" has a very specific definition of an open top 2-seater.
Old 04-14-2018, 09:14 AM
  #43  
simplex
Instructor
 
simplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rick brooklyn
Maybe he's British. In England "sports car" has a very specific definition of an open top 2-seater.
He's not. You could tell by the way he writes, by looking at his history, and also by his referencing R&T as the source of automotive journalism. Which means he was using the term 'sports car' not in the British, but in the most accepted US sense (same as the German term Sportwagen, incidentally).

So my objection to his statement stands.
Old 04-14-2018, 01:36 PM
  #44  
HenryPcar
Three Wheelin'
 
HenryPcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,967
Received 233 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Personally I was considering the 991 before I got the 997.2. I've driver both before I decided on a used 997.2
These are just my own perception, and everybody have their own conclusions. After driven both, I found the 991 is very stable while the 997 is a bit more agile and tossable. I think Porsche stablised the 991 even more by lengthening it. I'm talking about the wheel base length of over 4" over the 997 which is very significant. The stretched wheelbase no doubt make the 991 more stable. But on the other hand, with all the electronic controls, the 911's oversteering tendency is all but eliminated. The 997.2 having a shorter wheelbase has a different feel. Personally I like the bit of oversteer to enhance the neutrality when leaning into a corner. Its the neutral feeling that I like more of the 997. I can't comment at all on the 992, but so far the 997 has exceeding all my expectation on the feel and handlig.
Old 04-14-2018, 01:42 PM
  #45  
HenryPcar
Three Wheelin'
 
HenryPcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,967
Received 233 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rick brooklyn
Maybe he's British. In England "sports car" has a very specific definition of an open top 2-seater.

Not all British car fans are your buttoned down country club type that drives a open top roadster. Some hard cores like Chris Harris prefer their cars with the stiffest chassis and driving it like he stole it.


Quick Reply: 992 is not a real 911



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:18 AM.