Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How do our cars do in crash tests.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
neil.schneider's Avatar
neil.schneider
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 660
From: New Jersey(outside Phila)
Default How do our cars do in crash tests.

My friend was just involved and injured in a side impact. He is now in search of a new car and was interested in a 911 until he found out that they do no crash testing (in the US) and Porsche does not participate in IIHS safety testing. I reached out to Porsche NA and they confirmed this. They assured me the cars are safe and tested. Anyone have thoughts about how our cars would do in a collision? Any personal experiences.

Neil

Last edited by neil.schneider; Jun 27, 2017 at 06:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 04:35 PM
  #2  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 209
From: FL
Default

I'd say probably very well for a car that size, but it's no SUV or some these much "safer" options.

The 911's door window is staring right at the middle of the bumper on some of these monsters on the road. You can figure the rest out.

* I've seen or researches no 911 crash data. See quite a few crashed pics though. Not pretty.

As far as damage, easy to be declared "totals". Doesn't take much.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 04:37 PM
  #3  
Super50's Avatar
Super50
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 83
Likes: 26
From: Northern California
Default

Very well built, and the front end is all crumple zone, no motor in the way. Absorbs most of the impact.
Rear end damage tends to be more expensive to repair compared to other front engine cars in similar accidents.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
Ski Porsche's Avatar
Ski Porsche
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 193
From: A Little West of Zion NP
Default

Several years ago I was in a serious accident in my '06 Cayman S. It was an offset and slightly angled head-on collision with closing speeds estimated at 95 mph with the passenger side taking the brunt of the impact. The front crumpled and the passenger compartment remained remarkably whole and protected me as designed (though I'm glad no one was sitting in the passenger seat). The biggest concern I have is because the fuel tank's in front there was a fuel fire as a result of the impact. (my Porsche's have all had fire extinguishers since). I think the safety design of the Cayman saved my life. So does my wife, hence the continued P-car ownership.
I think your friend can buy a 911 with confidence.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
neil.schneider's Avatar
neil.schneider
Thread Starter
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 660
From: New Jersey(outside Phila)
Default

My friend was hit in the drivers door and suffered leg fractures and other injuries. It was a mercedes sl 550. The car and even the entire door is wider then ours. I was assured by Porsche NA that they do testing in Europe and while I am confident of the cars safety I can't really point to any studies. When I called Porsche the very nice guy who answered the phone couldn't even begin to answer the question. Kind of strange that this has never come up given how many soccer moms are driving their suvs around. In the USA car companies are always talking about their "star" rating for crash tests. I have to say I am a little surprised.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 209
From: FL
Default

The Porsche badge sells itself. They don't need to tout crash ratings. I'm sure the Cayenne and Macan do well. They engineer these cars very well. I'd have no concerns.

Common sense says that driving a small sports car is riskier than a Range Rover.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 07:30 PM
  #7  
Dewinator's Avatar
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 48
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Common sense says that driving a small sports car is riskier than a Range Rover.
A big heavy car is much more likely to kill someone in an accident than a 991 at the same speed. It'll be the other guy, not you, but you're still looking at jail time if it's your fault so it's worth consideration even if you don't factor injuries to other parties in your risk decisions.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 11:44 PM
  #8  
bkrantz's Avatar
bkrantz
Nordschleife Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,535
Likes: 1,403
From: SW Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by STG
The Porsche badge sells itself. They don't need to tout crash ratings. I'm sure the Cayenne and Macan do well. They engineer these cars very well. I'd have no concerns.

Common sense says that driving a small sports car is riskier than a Range Rover.
Not necessarily. The majority of fatal crashes are single vehicle (55% nation-wide, up to 70% in some states). And Range Rovers, along with all taller vehicles like SUV's and pickups, are MUCH more likely to roll over--the most deadly kind of crash.
Reply
Rennlist Stories

The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Best Non-Flat Six Porsches You Can Buy For Under $100K

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

6 Convertible Top MYTHS Most People Don't Understand!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

2026 Porsche 911 Club Coupe is Spectacular, And Everything Wrong with the Porsche Market

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Talos Takes Your 991 Porsche 911 GT3 to the Next Level for a Cool $1.13 Million

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

9 Vehicles Porsche Helped Engineer that Aren't Porsches

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

9 Features and Characteristics That Only Porsche People Understand

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

I've Written 500 Rennlist Articles: Here's How Porsche Has Changed Along the Way

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Unnecessary Porsches Ever Built (And Why We Love Them)

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 27, 2017 | 11:56 PM
  #9  
ipse dixit's Avatar
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 18,935
Likes: 15,014
Default

I walked away without a scratch after being T-boned from the driver's side by a car traveling 75+ mph, on the freeway.

Airbags deployed. Caused about a 2.5 hour traffic jam on the freeway during rush hour.

But walked away, no scratches. But did suffer a cracked clavicle. Still ...
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 11:23 AM
  #10  
fast1's Avatar
fast1
Race Car
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 219
Default

Originally Posted by bkrantz
Not necessarily. The majority of fatal crashes are single vehicle (55% nation-wide, up to 70% in some states). And Range Rovers, along with all taller vehicles like SUV's and pickups, are MUCH more likely to roll over--the most deadly kind of crash.
If a 5K lb Range Rover has a head on collision with a 3100 lb 911, the Range Rover will the be the safer vehicle. Other than that scenario, I'd take my chances with a 911. There's no car that has superior accident avoidance capabilities than a 911.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
spiderv6's Avatar
spiderv6
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 266
From: NJ
Default

I'm also surprised there is no crash data.

In Europe the equivalent is Euro NCAP and they list a Macan but nothing else.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 02:37 PM
  #12  
ace37's Avatar
ace37
Three Wheelin'
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 137
From: SLC, Utah
Default

I thought I would find one with a quick youtube search but no luck. A Boxster and a Macan are available. The Boxster performance might be somewhat similar.


I expect a 911 to be quite safe when running into something head on as the front end offers a large crumple zone that can absorb quite a bit of energy. Going underneath something tall in such an accident (semi or raised pickup) would be very dangerous, and rear and side impacts I'm not sure. I expect the safety engineering is quite good simply due to the level of engineering of everything else.


There is one case I concern myself with. I worry about the safety of a rear seat passenger in the event of being rear ended. The concerning but quite feasible scenario is if the freeway comes to an abrupt halt and the driver a ways behind me is not paying attention / using phone / etc. and hits me with full force after I've fully stopped. I always watch my mirrors closely in any scenario that seems that way and have an exit plan if possible (like run off to the shoulder to get out and provide more room).
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 03:05 PM
  #13  
Valvefloat991's Avatar
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 138
From: Golden, CO
Default

Originally Posted by fast1
If a 5K lb Range Rover has a head on collision with a 3100 lb 911, the Range Rover will the be the safer vehicle. Other than that scenario, I'd take my chances with a 911. There's no car that has superior accident avoidance capabilities than a 911.
And most of those rollovers occur when a driver leaves the pavement. There again, a 911 provides considerably more margin--unless you're hanging the tial out, of course.

As to crashes between vehicles, the Range Rover is probably better than a 911 in all scenarios. After all would you rather be in a Range Rover center-punched by a 911 or vice versa? Same goes for a rear-end collision.

As Bismarck said, "God is on the side of the heavy battalions."
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 03:27 PM
  #14  
Dan Nagy's Avatar
Dan Nagy
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,515
Likes: 2,229
From: The Beach
Default

The fire extinguisher: If not for yourself, then you can help save somebody else.

With all the distracted driving and my son rolling over one of my cars on ice this past winter, it's nice to know if I am trapped I can at least stave off the flames.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2017 | 07:03 PM
  #15  
jsaviano's Avatar
jsaviano
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 217
Likes: 4
Default

One issue many people forget is that a large (SUV) typically has more "stuff" all over it than a small/sports car. All that stuff flying around in a crash causes a lot of injuries. Supposedly, while physics tends to indicate the larger heavier car is "safer," you have a higher risk of injury in a large car - again, more crap flying around and more space for the person to flop around against.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:04 PM.

story-0
10 Best Non-Flat Six Porsches You Can Buy For Under $100K

Slideshow: If you have $100K to spend on a Porsche but want something a little different, these are the 10 best non-flat six Porsches you can buy.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-28 15:36:11


VIEW MORE
story-1
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions

Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-27 18:43:48


VIEW MORE
story-2
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field

Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-23 10:34:27


VIEW MORE
story-3
6 Convertible Top MYTHS Most People Don't Understand!

Slideshow: dispelling common convertible top myths

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-4
2026 Porsche 911 Club Coupe is Spectacular, And Everything Wrong with the Porsche Market

Slideshow: The 2026 Porsche 911 Club Coupe is being resold $150K above sticker and that is a real problem.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-21 11:52:54


VIEW MORE
story-5
Talos Takes Your 991 Porsche 911 GT3 to the Next Level for a Cool $1.13 Million

Slideshow: Talos Vehicles has transformed the Porsche 911 GT3 RS into a carbon-bodied, race-inspired machine that costs well over $1 million before the donor car is even included.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-19 13:39:04


VIEW MORE
story-6
9 Vehicles Porsche Helped Engineer that Aren't Porsches

Slideshow: Long before engineering consulting became trendy, Porsche was quietly helping other automakers build everything from supercars to economy hatchbacks.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-15 12:44:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
9 Features and Characteristics That Only Porsche People Understand

Slideshow: Some brands build cars. Porsche builds traditions, obsessions, and a few habits that stopped making sense decades ago but somehow became part of the charm.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-13 18:46:13


VIEW MORE
story-8
I've Written 500 Rennlist Articles: Here's How Porsche Has Changed Along the Way

Slideshow: Six years and 500 Rennlist articles later, these are the biggest changes at Porsche.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-11 09:52:55


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Unnecessary Porsches Ever Built (And Why We Love Them)

Slideshow: Some Porsches exist for very specific reasons-others feel like they were built just to see if anyone would notice.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-06 18:00:32


VIEW MORE