Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How do our cars do in crash tests.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2017 | 07:13 PM
  #16  
asia's Avatar
asia
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 270
Likes: 16
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by ace37
There is one case I concern myself with.
Over the last ten years, with my small commuter (1800lb Insight), 1 rear impact and 2 side impacts. You would think they would see you before changing lanes, but in a small car this is less likely apparently. Like with my sport bike, I've learned to try to avoid vehicles to the side in adjacent lanes when possible.
Old 06-28-2017 | 07:17 PM
  #17  
Porsche911GTS'16's Avatar
Porsche911GTS'16
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 1,202
From: Playa Del Rey, CA
Default

Someone turned left in front of me at an intersection here in LA. I tried to swerve left to avoid her. No luck. My front right hit her front right. She was in an SUV. My airbags deployed and worked beautifully. No burns to my body. The impact was probably at 50 mph when our vehicle speeds are combined. I was amazed that that light cover did not crack as it was a direct hit. About $28k in damage to my prior 911, a C2 cab. I was very impressed with how well the car took the impact and with how well the air bags worked.
Attached Images   
Old 06-28-2017 | 07:21 PM
  #18  
Porsche911GTS'16's Avatar
Porsche911GTS'16
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 1,202
From: Playa Del Rey, CA
Default

And yes, those are ears that you see in the front seat. That is my Boston Terrier, Addy. She too survived the accident unscathed. Here she is recently, dreaming about squirrels.
Attached Images  
Old 06-28-2017 | 07:48 PM
  #19  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,836
Likes: 3,642
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by ace37
I thought I would find one with a quick youtube search but no luck. A Boxster and a Macan are available. The Boxster performance might be somewhat similar.


I expect a 911 to be quite safe when running into something head on as the front end offers a large crumple zone that can absorb quite a bit of energy. Going underneath something tall in such an accident (semi or raised pickup) would be very dangerous, and rear and side impacts I'm not sure. I expect the safety engineering is quite good simply due to the level of engineering of everything else.


There is one case I concern myself with. I worry about the safety of a rear seat passenger in the event of being rear ended. The concerning but quite feasible scenario is if the freeway comes to an abrupt halt and the driver a ways behind me is not paying attention / using phone / etc. and hits me with full force after I've fully stopped. I always watch my mirrors closely in any scenario that seems that way and have an exit plan if possible (like run off to the shoulder to get out and provide more room).
I've always been concerned when some mammoth (Yukon XL, etc) with disk rotors about the size of a small dinner plate tailgates my 911, you *know*
that if you have to brake hard, the "chinet" rotors on the BFSUV are not
going to stop as quickly even if the driver isn't updating their relationship
status on FB ... at best its not going to be pretty, and it is going to be
*expensive* assuming you get away w/o injury...

this is not a shortcoming of the 911 design, its the 5 tons of sh*t behind you...
Old 06-28-2017 | 07:51 PM
  #20  
Benedict14's Avatar
Benedict14
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 857
Likes: 293
From: RAIM Unreliable
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
As Bismarck said, "God is on the side of the heavy battalions."
He may have been heard to say it, but he didn't say it first. Viscount Turenne coined the phrase about two hundred years before Bismarck was born. It's been repeated by Voltaire ironically.

Wonder if Bismarck knew he was quoting a Frenchmen ? Probably rolling around in his grave. 🤓
Old 06-28-2017 | 08:07 PM
  #21  
Valvefloat991's Avatar
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 121
From: Golden, CO
Default

Never heard of Turenne, but I'm a philistine engineer, but I always liked the phrase. In any case, I stand corrected.
Old 06-28-2017 | 08:19 PM
  #22  
Benedict14's Avatar
Benedict14
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 857
Likes: 293
From: RAIM Unreliable
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
Never heard of Turenne, but I'm a philistine engineer, but I always liked the phrase. In any case, I stand corrected.
Agreed. And in general, the Germans had most of the good ones. Von Clausewitz, Von Moltke and Von Platen (had to work at least one Porsche reference in there

I'm the product of a government funded, institutionalized, tertiary education. Apparently.
Old 06-28-2017 | 09:51 PM
  #23  
rwschill's Avatar
rwschill
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 2
Default Accident testing

I think if any car company thought there results we're excellent you would see it published somewhere. I think my 911 is very solid and accident avoidance should be very good but why is adaptive cruise and lane change assist not standard as it is in my Ford Pickup at 1/3 the cost?
Would like see some data.
Old 06-28-2017 | 11:53 PM
  #24  
bkrantz's Avatar
bkrantz
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 1,125
From: SW Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
And most of those rollovers occur when a driver leaves the pavement. There again, a 911 provides considerably more margin--unless you're hanging the tial out, of course.

As to crashes between vehicles, the Range Rover is probably better than a 911 in all scenarios. After all would you rather be in a Range Rover center-punched by a 911 or vice versa? Same goes for a rear-end collision.

As Bismarck said, "God is on the side of the heavy battalions."
For anything on the lighter side of a true medium (or "heavy duty" light) truck, including anything made by Land Rover, I still think I would prefer to be in the latest Benz S class. It may give up a bit in mass, but the safety engineering is second-to-none. And it will probably stay right side up.
Old 06-29-2017 | 12:07 AM
  #25  
Valvefloat991's Avatar
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 121
From: Golden, CO
Default

Originally Posted by rwschill
I think if any car company thought there results we're excellent you would see it published somewhere. I think my 911 is very solid and accident avoidance should be very good but why is adaptive cruise and lane change assist not standard as it is in my Ford Pickup at 1/3 the cost?
Would like see some data.
The crash tests are expensive and then tend to be conducted on vehicles that sell at large volumes. That's why we don't see any 911 results.

As to adaptive cruise, I hate it because it is always doing the wrong thing. It's only useful in a long, single-lane construction zone. I wouldn't take any car in which the adaptive cruise couldn't be switched back to "dumb" cruise control--even with a $5000 discount.
Old 06-29-2017 | 02:55 AM
  #26  
ace37's Avatar
ace37
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 134
From: SLC, Utah
Default

Boxster:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcoAgQ4QZkk

Macan:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fXY5CUKLEw
Old 06-29-2017 | 08:49 AM
  #27  
K-A's Avatar
K-A
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 139
Default

Anyone have any real life pictures of how the side "curtain" airbags work on the 911's/Cayman's/Boxster's? Porsche "POSIP" is what they call their safety tech. There are drawings of how they work, but I haven't seen live footage.

It appears the sports cars don't have traditional curtain airbags. Instead, the airbags deploy from the top of the door panel and go upwards. I'm curious as to how HIGH they go, as I'm quite tall and my head goes above the window line (it's side by side with the lower part of the hard roof, though of course covered by the headliner).
Old 06-29-2017 | 09:22 AM
  #28  
Hurricane's Avatar
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 713
From: Northern Virginia
Default

I don't think they fare well at all. In the crash test videos I have seen, they fall apart like a toy, pieces flying everywhere.

Old 06-30-2017 | 05:18 PM
  #29  
leanofpeak's Avatar
leanofpeak
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 110
Likes: 3
From: KPAO
Default

Too bad Porsche is not listed here:

http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings

Would like to see how the 991.2 performs in the off-set test...
Old 07-01-2017 | 01:20 AM
  #30  
skiahh's Avatar
skiahh
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 132
From: Fruita, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
And most of those rollovers occur when a driver leaves the pavement. There again, a 911 provides considerably more margin--unless you're hanging the tial out, of course.

As to crashes between vehicles, the Range Rover is probably better than a 911 in all scenarios. After all would you rather be in a Range Rover center-punched by a 911 or vice versa? Same goes for a rear-end collision.

As Bismarck said, "God is on the side of the heavy battalions."
I just call it the "law of gross tonnage."



Quick Reply: How do our cars do in crash tests.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:36 AM.