Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stupid Economist Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2017, 03:17 PM
  #16  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 17 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,262
Received 424 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

+1 Dumb article.

I almost subscribed to The Economist rag due to a teaser offer. I don't need another whiner telling me how to live my life.
Old 04-14-2017, 03:50 PM
  #17  
Asquared
Nordschleife Master
 
Asquared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 7,281
Received 66 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cug
I'd love if there were regulations in place to actually incentivize people to use alternative modes of transport for their daily commute instead of promoting the inefficient use of private vehicles for the repetitive drive everyday.

And I'm actually affected by that as I live in that area the article talks about and see day in day out how horrible traffic has become over the last 10 years. And it was bad to begin with.
We have this. We pay gasoline taxes that were intended to be targeted for building and maintaining roads but actually gets spent on:
Originally Posted by cug
better bike paths, a workable public transport system, discouraging of massive individual vehicles for single person transport etc.
Every public transportation system in this country is massively subsidized. The New York City subway system was largely built by private companies and made money until the government took it over, it now loses billions.

Meanwhile, our roads suck because the government is spending the money intended for roads on the things you want but don't attract enough ridership to cover the electricity bill.

You can't have a workable public transport system without density and a central business district where a lot of people work.
Old 04-14-2017, 04:03 PM
  #18  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,858 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cug
I'd love if there were regulations in place to actually incentivize people to use alternative modes of transport for their daily commute instead of promoting the inefficient use of private vehicles for the repetitive drive everyday.
.
Or you could just price the services on a market basis and let the market decide.

Problem is, many of the alternative forms of transportation out there would be way more expensive if they were priced at the true cost of service, excluding subsidies. Some would go away entirely.
Old 04-14-2017, 04:48 PM
  #19  
cug
Instructor
 
cug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by randr
Better bike paths? How do you take your kids to preschool/school? How do you get to 5 or 6 business meetings in a day?
They do the same thing I did: they take the bus or they walk or take the bicycle. We are training a generation of clueless, over-protected, under-educated, entitled morons right now. Actually, that started a while ago and they are applying for jobs and I see their resumes (and the people) show up here. What a nightmare.

I actually go to enough meetings (walk, take a shuttle, or use AVCN, or phone conferences). But I'm also not a spoiled brat that has to drive 200 meters to get their de-caf, non-fat, non-dairy, three-pump sugar-free vanilla latte.

Originally Posted by randr
Incentives ahh yes, the Progressive agenda
I'm actually on the agenda of "what works". And self-organization, individual transport, capitalist health insurance etc don't work. So don't patronize, go out and do something useful.

I actually think the same thing about you that you are thinking about me: that you have no effing clue what you are talking about and just talk populist BS out of your rear.

Therefore, it's not that helpful that we keep discussing politics, let's get to Porsche cars again, let's ban Prius and other road obstacles, that would solve the traffic situation just as well.
Old 04-14-2017, 06:25 PM
  #20  
VintageRacer
Rennlist Member
 
VintageRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 17 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,262
Received 424 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

I am not sure about someone who joined 6 months ago and seems to know everything.

I am not using public transportation (its a crime-ridden POS here) since I prefer to drive a Porsche when I need to go to dinner or visit a friend. I control my business from my home.
Old 04-14-2017, 06:40 PM
  #21  
cug
Instructor
 
cug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
I am not sure about someone who joined 6 months ago and seems to know everything.
Your logic is kind of flawed as join date to a Porsche specific forum has nothing to do with knowledge/opinion/experience in terms of the social or transport aspects of a society.

The Porsche owner demographic is not really what I would consider a group of people that actually know much about the day-to-day issues of public transport though ... and it's kind of inspiring that people who "control their businesses from home" join the conversation on commute options ... it feels exactly like congress discussing what the low income group needs for social security.
Old 04-14-2017, 08:43 PM
  #22  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,668
Received 1,300 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

What am I reading here? The Rich or Non Rich. What? I had to double check to make sure I was on Rennlist.
Old 04-14-2017, 09:04 PM
  #23  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,298 Likes on 886 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cug
... and it's kind of inspiring that people who "control their businesses from home" join the conversation on commute options.
It should be inspiring. For most people, driving to work at 9 and home at 5 should be a relic of the past. But no one in power, from corporate management to urban planners, seems to understand that.

Here in the supposedly-forward-thinking Seattle area, we just instituted a tolling system that's carefully engineered to reward drivers who live 10+ miles from their workplace. And we wonder why congestion just gets worse and worse.
Old 04-15-2017, 04:10 AM
  #24  
Porscheforever
Racer
 
Porscheforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
I am not sure about someone who joined 6 months ago and seems to know everything.

I am not using public transportation (its a crime-ridden POS here) since I prefer to drive a Porsche when I need to go to dinner or visit a friend. I control my business from my home.
Sorry to hijack the thread....my wife is visiting Minneapolis and plan to use public transport (railway?) there next month. Is it safe riding public transport there like around downtown, mall of america or paisley park where the legend lived?
Old 04-15-2017, 04:49 AM
  #25  
dethred
Intermediate
 
dethred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porscheforever
Sorry to hijack the thread....my wife is visiting Minneapolis and plan to use public transport (railway?) there next month. Is it safe riding public transport there like around downtown, mall of america or paisley park where the legend lived?

No, all public transport is basically a ticket to rape and murder. I think I read that earlier in the thread.
Old 04-15-2017, 04:53 AM
  #26  
dethred
Intermediate
 
dethred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VintageRacer
I am not sure about someone who joined 6 months ago and seems to know everything.

I am not using public transportation (its a crime-ridden POS here) since I prefer to drive a Porsche when I need to go to dinner or visit a friend. I control my business from my home.

Winner of the "dumbest post in 991 section ever" award. Doubt the credentials of someone discussing an off-topic subject because they joined the forum after you, then proceed to admit that you have no experience with what is being discussed. Epic. Truly epic.
Old 04-20-2017, 02:34 AM
  #27  
dawgcatching
Burning Brakes
 
dawgcatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cug
Your logic is kind of flawed as join date to a Porsche specific forum has nothing to do with knowledge/opinion/experience in terms of the social or transport aspects of a society.

The Porsche owner demographic is not really what I would consider a group of people that actually know much about the day-to-day issues of public transport though ... and it's kind of inspiring that people who "control their businesses from home" join the conversation on commute options ... it feels exactly like congress discussing what the low income group needs for social security.
I ride my bike to work most days! Just thankful to arrive in 1 piece.
Old 04-20-2017, 02:40 AM
  #28  
dawgcatching
Burning Brakes
 
dawgcatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by randr
Better bike paths? How do you take your kids to preschool/school? How do you get to 5 or 6 business meetings in a day?
I don't know about the meeting part, or where you live, but my kindergartner and I ride to school most days. During the winter, we ski to school. As do 40% of the kids in this neighborhood.

What is so terrible about keeping congestion off the road? I like to drive for fun, not sit in traffic. Much better to be whistling past, on 2 wheels driven by my own propulsion.



Quick Reply: Stupid Economist Article



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:35 PM.