Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Went on a test drive in a 2017 991.2 S and...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2016 | 02:29 PM
  #1  
JoshuaKM1's Avatar
JoshuaKM1
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 25
From: Nashville, TN
Default Went on a test drive in a 2017 991.2 S and...

I loved it! Not really sure why there are so many haters out there. I know, I know ... the turbo vs. NA debate will rage on forever. Blah blah the 991.2 has so many steering guidance nannies that it feels like a video game ... blah blah. What horse crap.

Anyways my test vehicle was a gorgeous 991.2 S in GT silver & standard agate interior w/ PDK, sport exhaust, and a few other goodies. I had a blast taking it for a spin on a gorgeous day here in Charleston.

My general impressions:

(1) I loved being able to access substantial low-end torque & I thought the sport exhaust sounded quite good.

(2) Loved the new steering wheel and for some reason I felt the steering was a bit more precise than my 991.1 ... maybe that's only in my head?

(3) Loved the new navi screen .... google street view looked awesome!

I think new 991.2 owners are going to be very, very happy but I still hold on to a few opinions .... so don't flame me for saying these things b/c these are just MY opinions and may not be YOUR opinions.

(1) If I had 120k+ to spend on a new car I would much rather get the rocket ship (CPO Turbo S) .... obviously if you are rich as F and you only buy new cars then of course this will not work for you.


(2) I loved all the new changes on the 991.2 but not nearly enough to make a move from my 991.1 any time soon. In 3 years I may do the same thing I did with my 991.1 which is purchase a massively optioned 991.2 for about 82-85. Or at that point I may hold my 991.1 until the next generation 911 is released (and goes CPO after a few years).

Happy to answer any specific questions but I wanted to give two big thumbs up to the 991.2.

(Also included a picture of my car next to another 991.2 in the new graphite blue color - I liked the new blue but I still prefer sapphire blue which I think pops more)

Cheers from Charleston,

Josh
Attached Images    
Old 04-09-2016 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
mb1's Avatar
mb1
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 233
From: chicago
Default

Thanks for your post. Whenever I see graphite blue, I think too much blue and not enough graphite. So close to being an awesome color.
Old 04-09-2016 | 02:48 PM
  #3  
golfnutintib's Avatar
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 47
From: ..............
Default

i was at local dealer 991.2 launch party last night... they had a graphite blue car on floor with two tone beige perforated interior... truly gorgeous car.

graphite blue is a strikingly beautiful color - a real winner imho

despite my reservations seeing the press pics on line etc etc, i have to admit the car overall looks much much better in the flesh than in pics - really lovely...
Old 04-09-2016 | 02:59 PM
  #4  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,836
Likes: 3,643
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

look at the Ring time posted for the .2 'S'! spec one of those with PDK, PASM-S, RWS, Sport Chrono, and PCCB I would imagine that a 991 GT3 might have a hard time getting away from one ... or maybe even keeping up with it (on a track with a bunch of slow corners where low end torque on the exit would be beneficial)

I'd love to see an Evo video or article pitting these cars like this!
Old 04-09-2016 | 03:13 PM
  #5  
oalvarez's Avatar
oalvarez
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 54
From: los angeles
Default

Originally Posted by mb1
Thanks for your post. Whenever I see graphite blue, I think too much blue and not enough graphite. So close to being an awesome color.
exactly how i feel. saw a cabrio in graphite blue at my local dealer and immediately said "yuck." doesn't do much for me; it appears bland and has a borderline "elegant" look to it as opposed to a more sporting color. of course, if that's what one is after......
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
subshooter's Avatar
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 2,376
From: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Default

Thank you for your review. The exhaust note is the only part that I am concerned about. Since you own a 991.1 S, can you comment on the comparison further?

Did your 991 S have PSE?
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:21 PM
  #7  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

Josh, you're my buddy, and yes I've been one of the "haters", but you're comparing your .1 non PSE C2S, to a .2 S w/PSE.

As far as comparing the sound of the two, not a direct comparison.

Torque, sure, .2 has it beat. Most guys have written about losing that special touch as a trade off for the other changes.

Anyway, glad you got to drive it
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:36 PM
  #8  
R_Rated's Avatar
R_Rated
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 42
From: Where aspirations are natural
Default

For people that daily drive their cars the 991.2 is definitely a better car... The 991.1 is the better weekend toy though.

That being said - Singer is the only new P car that is universally accepted... We all B!tch everytime there is a change - too big, electric steering, etc. It's happened every time there has been a change to the 911 for 50 years!

Each new iteration will be faster and more advanced. Technology is gaining momentum faster than ever before. Faster and more advanced however does not mean more desirable.
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:40 PM
  #9  
JoshuaKM1's Avatar
JoshuaKM1
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 206
Likes: 25
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Haha STG my point was not to make a sound comparison - I'll leave that to the "exhaust experts." Yes I don't have PSE but honestly I care far more about speed/handling than sound. (Im sure that comment will make tons of 911 owners have a panic attack). I'd rather have a silent hybrid electric 911 that takes its cues from Porsche's Le Mans car. Of course there are tons of owners who would rather have a vintage 911 in manual with an amazing sounding exhaust note. Different strokes for different folks. My overall point is that it handles great.
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:43 PM
  #10  
R_Rated's Avatar
R_Rated
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 42
From: Where aspirations are natural
Default

Originally Posted by JoshuaKM1
Haha STG my point was not to make a sound comparison - I'll leave that to the "exhaust experts." Yes I don't have PSE but honestly I care far more about speed/handling than sound. (Im sure that comment will make tons of 911 owners have a panic attack). I'd rather have a silent hybrid electric 911 that takes its cues from Porsche's Le Mans car. Of course there are tons of owners who would rather have a vintage 911 in manual with an amazing sounding exhaust note. Different strokes for different folks. My overall point is that it handles great.
BAN!!!
Old 04-09-2016 | 04:48 PM
  #11  
Dewinator's Avatar
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 44
Default

Meh. I know I'm a grump too, but if I wanted more low end torque, I'd get a Z06. I've driven my buddy's and there's no way the .2 pulls that hard, but I still prefer the way my 3.8 builds as it revs. It's the higher redline on the GT3 that makes me jealous more than anything else.
Old 04-09-2016 | 05:07 PM
  #12  
K1600GT's Avatar
K1600GT
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 37
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Default

Let me chime in. I just finished a 30 minute test drive in a 17 991.2S, PDK and sport exhaust. I currently drive a 15 991.1 C4S, PDK and sport exhaust. Here are my initial thoughts.

1. The car looks much better in person than online. The car was painted Miami Blue which looked great. Overall the exterior design was well carried out including the rear vents. The interior was finished in Graphite Blue/Chalk which looked way too bland, and wouldn't be my choice with Miami Blue.
2. Loved the RS Spyder design wheels.
3. It sounded good but much quieter than my 991.1. In sport plus + it was even quieter. As others have said I think sports exhaust is a must have option.
3. Lot's of low end torque right away especially out of corners. I did notice some turbo lag but it was quite subtle. They really have it dialed in for everyday driving. I thought it was most noticeable on the highway at 70, when accelerating without down shifting, one Mississippi, two Mississippi, three Mississippi, gone.
3. In seemed to be a bit smoother on the comfort shock setting than the 991.1. I didn't notice any real difference with steering response which felt precise and tight.
4. It had the optional GT sport steering wheel which felt too small. I have the sport design steering wheel on my car and like it much better. I thought it looked cheap with too much plastic chrome.
5. New NAV and car play was a much needed update.

I'm looking forward to driving the base Carrera as a comparison.
Old 04-09-2016 | 05:11 PM
  #13  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Likes: 3,886
Default

Power and handling improvements don't surprise me. They're facts. What I'm still concerned about and won't be able to conclude on until I actually drive one is throttle response. The fact that some reviewers have commented on the classic difference between NA and turbo being present in this car, while others have not, makes me wonder what's up. Are some cars worse than others or do some people just not have a good feel for throttle response. Or are haters just making it up.

Other than not caring at all for the exterior styling tweaks, the only thing that would keep me from buying the .2 would be throttle response. Every single FI car I've ever driven in my life has had that disappointing subtle lag, followed by too much power, followed by a need to back off. Drives me nuts and there's no amount of power increase that would make me be willing to live with that in my car. So I'm anxious to drive one myself.
Old 04-09-2016 | 05:14 PM
  #14  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Likes: 3,886
Default

Originally Posted by K1600GT
3. Lot's of low end torque right away especially out of corners. I did notice some turbo lag but it was quite subtle. They really have it dialed in for everyday driving. I thought it was most noticeable on the highway at 70, when accelerating without down shifting, one Mississippi, two Mississippi, three Mississippi, gone.
This is what I'm concerned about. Not so much the freeway part, though that isn't fun either, it's just lag in general, even a little, drives me nuts. And it's not just the lag, its how the car makes power once it spools up. Is it easily modulatable or when driving hard do you find it difficult to get just the right amount of power without having to constantly back off. That's what I'm curious about.

My wife's Q7 with the top tune has a ton of power and it's smooth as silk, but once you try to drive it hard it's like driving a car with an on/off switch for a throttle. I found the same thing with my A6 3.0T.
Old 04-09-2016 | 05:18 PM
  #15  
Dewinator's Avatar
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Every single FI car I've ever driven in my life has had that disappointing subtle lag, too much power, followed by a need to back off. Drives me nuts and there's no amount of power increase that would make me be willing to live with that in my car. So I'm anxious to drive one myself.
That's exactly how I feel! I can't even stand to drive the stupid PDK in auto mode, because maybe I just want full throttle in my current gear, not a pause while it downshifts and then way more push than I wanted.


Quick Reply: Went on a test drive in a 2017 991.2 S and...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:12 AM.