Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dropping my 2015 F80 M3 for a 2015 991 3.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2016, 07:16 PM
  #61  
RichAA
Racer
 
RichAA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slingshot60
?... You guys have 'S' envy...
I do not have 'S' envy. But I absolutely have Sport Techno envy...
Old 03-14-2016, 11:05 PM
  #62  
slingshot60
Rennlist Member
 
slingshot60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 340
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
Right I have 'S' envy. Perhaps you should check my post history before making an aśś out of yourself.
I honestly could care less about your 'post history'... Only one person making an *** of himself in this discussion--and it's not me. This is not a "mine is bigger than yours" discussion. Simply about getting a near-new or new Base 991 vs getting a CPO 2-3 yr old 991S. You have your opinion and I have mine. However--if you honestly think a Base 991 will pull harder on the top end than an S... Well, you're just wrong.
Old 03-14-2016, 11:33 PM
  #63  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,870 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
High end RPM pull of the 'S?' Don't think so. The 3.4 revs faster in the high RPM range compared to the 3.8. Mid range torque comes with displacement but fast revving comes with lighter pistons like the 3.4 has. The 3.4 pull is much edgier and downright scary compared to the more composed and luxurious 3.8 at high RPM. .
While I love the base car and it's more than enough power, this is just nonsense. While the 3.4 revs quick, the 3.8 stomps it everywhere, particularly in the midrange on the street. Both great cars, but the S is noticeably quicker in every situation. I'd still recommend the OP get that base car.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:44 AM
  #64  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slingshot60
I honestly could care less about your 'post history'... Only one person making an *** of himself in this discussion--and it's not me. This is not a "mine is bigger than yours" discussion. Simply about getting a near-new or new Base 991 vs getting a CPO 2-3 yr old 991S. You have your opinion and I have mine. However--if you honestly think a Base 991 will pull harder on the top end than an S... Well, you're just wrong.
I'm sure you 'could care less.' I'm not the one throwing around false accusations. You are.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:55 AM
  #65  
Chris C.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 3,165
Received 535 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azula
OP
[*]The F80 responds to mods much better and would definitely be quicker in a straight line. Also more bells/whistles (head up display is awesome)
It's not, it would be close but only if the M4 could hook up the rear tires.

It does have more bells/whistles, if you care about lane departure warning systems and HUD

Originally Posted by azula
Resale value would be better on the F80 since I am the first owner. I presume I would take a massive hit on depreciation being the 2nd owner of any P car. (Correct me if I'm wrong).[/LIST]
This makes no sense. Both cars depreciate, but a 3-year old Porsche should depreciate less all things being equal
Old 03-15-2016, 02:58 AM
  #66  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
While I love the base car and it's more than enough power, this is just nonsense. While the 3.4 revs quick, the 3.8 stomps it everywhere, particularly in the midrange on the street. Both great cars, but the S is noticeably quicker in every situation. I'd still recommend the OP get that base car.
No one argued otherwise about the 3.8 down low or in the middle. We're talking about the high range RPMs. Do you know the difference between lap times (Nürburgring, Hockenheimring, etc.) of the base and the 'S?' The 'S' doesn't stomp the base in anything, not even in 0-60 times. That's the real nonsense. Most who test drove both couldn't tell much difference. Particularly in the high end. I don't care what anyone drives, but I'm tired of this two tiered discussion where the base is criticised by people who don't know better (not you in particular). I can see all the 'S' boys loving the torquey 991.2 'S'. It feels like it can pull a train, so it must be better, right?
Old 03-15-2016, 03:55 AM
  #67  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,870 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
No one argued otherwise about the 3.8 down low or in the middle. We're talking about the high range RPMs. Do you know the difference between lap times (Nürburgring, Hockenheimring, etc.) of the base and the 'S?' The 'S' doesn't stomp the base in anything, not even in 0-60 times. That's the real nonsense. Most who test drove both couldn't tell much difference. Particularly in the high end.
Total BS. I've driven them back to back multiple times. Anyone who can't tell the difference should find a new hobby. The S has more down low, more in the middle and more hp up top. It is very noticeable.

And the Ring time gap between these two cars is 24 seconds! That's a f$&king eternity on the Ring.
Old 03-15-2016, 04:34 AM
  #68  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Total BS. I've driven them back to back multiple times. Anyone who can't tell the difference should find a new hobby. The S has more down low, more in the middle and more hp up top. It is very noticeable.

And the Ring time gap between these two cars is 24 seconds! That's a f$&king eternity on the Ring.
Good for you for feeling such a difference - let's see what the acceleration times are.

Base
0 - 10 mph 0.8 s
0 - 20 mph 1.5 s
0 - 30 mph 2.1 s
0 - 40 mph 2.7 s
0 - 50 mph 3.4 s
0 - 60 mph 4.1 s
0 - 70 mph 5.1 s
0 - 80 mph 6.3 s
0 - 90 mph 7.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.8 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...11-carrera-991

S
0 - 10 mph 0.7 s
0 - 20 mph 1.3 s
0 - 30 mph 1.8 s
0 - 40 mph 2.4 s
0 - 50 mph 3 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 70 mph 4.5 s
0 - 80 mph 5.6 s
0 - 90 mph 6.9 s
0 - 100 mph 8.5 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...-carrera-s-991

You know what's BS? I will leave the data up and I am sure you can 'feel' half second to a second differences.

Lap times? The average speed at the 'Ring' was about 100 mph for the 'S' and about 95 mph for the base. Guess you can feel 5 mph difference also. Simple calculation.

Those same links will lead you to other lap times that show how the 'S' 'stomps' the base.
Old 03-15-2016, 10:15 AM
  #69  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris C.
It's not, it would be close but only if the M4 could hook up the rear tires.

It does have more bells/whistles, if you care about lane departure warning systems and HUD



This makes no sense. Both cars depreciate, but a 3-year old Porsche should depreciate less all things being equal

I like to think people that drive Porsches are skilled enough to stay in their lane... I would like a HUD... too bad it'll never be a thing - ever in a 3.8
Old 03-15-2016, 10:23 AM
  #70  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
Good for you for feeling such a difference - let's see what the acceleration times are.

Base
0 - 10 mph 0.8 s
0 - 20 mph 1.5 s
0 - 30 mph 2.1 s
0 - 40 mph 2.7 s
0 - 50 mph 3.4 s
0 - 60 mph 4.1 s
0 - 70 mph 5.1 s
0 - 80 mph 6.3 s
0 - 90 mph 7.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.8 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...11-carrera-991

S
0 - 10 mph 0.7 s
0 - 20 mph 1.3 s
0 - 30 mph 1.8 s
0 - 40 mph 2.4 s
0 - 50 mph 3 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 70 mph 4.5 s
0 - 80 mph 5.6 s
0 - 90 mph 6.9 s
0 - 100 mph 8.5 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...-carrera-s-991

You know what's BS? I will leave the data up and I am sure you can 'feel' half second to a second differences.

Lap times? The average speed at the 'Ring' was about 100 mph for the 'S' and about 95 mph for the base. Guess you can feel 5 mph difference also. Simple calculation.

Those same links will lead you to other lap times that show how the 'S' 'stomps' the base.

For people that like nice cars and don't look for them as a driving experience or ever push them - there is no difference in the performance. I agree that for a street car that there is little benefit... but people that drive cars can absolutely feel the difference in how a car pulls when the difference in .5 seconds to 60mph. The spread in your data only increases in the top range providing data that the S is in fact significantly stronger up top.

Data and facts awesome.

The Gforces would be additional data to support that you can quantify the feeling.
Old 03-15-2016, 10:38 AM
  #71  
slingshot60
Rennlist Member
 
slingshot60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 340
Received 50 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
Good for you for feeling such a difference - let's see what the acceleration times are.

Base
0 - 10 mph 0.8 s
0 - 20 mph 1.5 s
0 - 30 mph 2.1 s
0 - 40 mph 2.7 s
0 - 50 mph 3.4 s
0 - 60 mph 4.1 s
0 - 70 mph 5.1 s
0 - 80 mph 6.3 s
0 - 90 mph 7.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.8 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...11-carrera-991

S
0 - 10 mph 0.7 s
0 - 20 mph 1.3 s
0 - 30 mph 1.8 s
0 - 40 mph 2.4 s
0 - 50 mph 3 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 70 mph 4.5 s
0 - 80 mph 5.6 s
0 - 90 mph 6.9 s
0 - 100 mph 8.5 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...-carrera-s-991

You know what's BS? I will leave the data up and I am sure you can 'feel' half second to a second differences.

Lap times? The average speed at the 'Ring' was about 100 mph for the 'S' and about 95 mph for the base. Guess you can feel 5 mph difference also. Simple calculation.

Those same links will lead you to other lap times that show how the 'S' 'stomps' the base.
Thank you for proving my point with your numbers. If you really can't feel the difference back to back when driving a car that runs 0-100 mph in 8.5 seconds and one that runs it in 9.8--maybe you should be driving something else... Like others have mentioned, I too drove the two cars 30 minutes apart over the same test drive loop. Both were PDK equipped with Sport Chrono. IN MY OPINION (which I guess by your standards I'm not allowed to have or voice... ) the S felt noticeably stouter mid range and pulled harder on the top end. I'm NOT bashing the Base 991--it is a very nice car, handles well and runs good. Just not as good as an S model IN MY OPINION.
Old 03-15-2016, 10:45 AM
  #72  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slingshot60
Thank you for proving my point with your numbers. If you really can't feel the difference back to back when driving a car that runs 0-100 mph in 8.5 seconds and one that runs it in 9.8--maybe you should be driving something else... Like others have mentioned, I too drove the two cars 30 minutes apart over the same test drive loop. Both were PDK equipped with Sport Chrono. IN MY OPINION (which I guess by your standards I'm not allowed to have or voice... ) the S felt noticeably stouter mid range and pulled harder on the top end. I'm NOT bashing the Base 991--it is a very nice car, handles well and runs good. Just not as good as an S model IN MY OPINION.
Basically the point that I made - there's probably factual data out there about Gforces in acceleration and cornering to support and quantify this factually.

Your opinion is no longer relevant because we have empirical, heuristic principals to support as fact.
Old 03-15-2016, 01:55 PM
  #73  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,870 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 997s07
Good for you for feeling such a difference - let's see what the acceleration times are.

Base
0 - 10 mph 0.8 s
0 - 20 mph 1.5 s
0 - 30 mph 2.1 s
0 - 40 mph 2.7 s
0 - 50 mph 3.4 s
0 - 60 mph 4.1 s
0 - 70 mph 5.1 s
0 - 80 mph 6.3 s
0 - 90 mph 7.9 s
0 - 100 mph 9.8 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...11-carrera-991

S
0 - 10 mph 0.7 s
0 - 20 mph 1.3 s
0 - 30 mph 1.8 s
0 - 40 mph 2.4 s
0 - 50 mph 3 s
0 - 60 mph 3.6 s
0 - 70 mph 4.5 s
0 - 80 mph 5.6 s
0 - 90 mph 6.9 s
0 - 100 mph 8.5 s
http://accelerationtimes.com/models/...-carrera-s-991

You know what's BS? I will leave the data up and I am sure you can 'feel' half second to a second differences.
Are you serious? You don't think a full half second difference in 0-60 times is noticeable? Do you actually drive these cars? It's absolutely noticeable. As is 1.3 seconds difference to 100mph, as is 24 full seconds on the Ring, which is a massive difference in Ring Terms. The base Carrera doesn't even break 8 minutes there.

Again, it's a great car in it's own right and nobody needs anything more than it, but its simply not comparable to the S in terms of power. It's a level below, as was/is intended by Porsche. They're different cars.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:22 PM
  #74  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

So much Porsche vs. Porsche S angst, I'd hate to see Porsche vs. Corvette.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:48 PM
  #75  
n2cars
Three Wheelin'
 
n2cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado/California
Posts: 1,462
Received 234 Likes on 134 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by slingshot60
Thank you for proving my point with your numbers. If you really can't feel the difference back to back when driving a car that runs 0-100 mph in 8.5 seconds and one that runs it in 9.8--maybe you should be driving something else... Like others have mentioned, I too drove the two cars 30 minutes apart over the same test drive loop. Both were PDK equipped with Sport Chrono. IN MY OPINION (which I guess by your standards I'm not allowed to have or voice... ) the S felt noticeably stouter mid range and pulled harder on the top end. I'm NOT bashing the Base 991--it is a very nice car, handles well and runs good. Just not as good as an S model IN MY OPINION.
Proclaiming one car better than another is always a slippery slope. Consumer Report would beg to differ. A couple years ago they reported that the Base car was more reliable than the S. So I guess the Base is really the better car. The one thing the S is good at is extracting money from the buyer's wallet. Costs more to buy and loses more on depreciation. But hey, you can't put a price on that 1/2 second faster to 60 mph ;-) S owners should be careful about bashing Base cars. The new 991.2 Base is as fast if not faster than the 991.1 S. And it still costs less than the 991.1 S.
I'm off on a rant here but ..... 50 years from now.... will the 2016 C2 be the car to own at Barrett-Jackson? I believe I read in Panamera Magazine that 9 out of 10 911s that Porsche sells are S and Turbo models. Also, 9 out of 10 are PDK. Looks like the smart buy is the 2016 C2 with a manual.


Quick Reply: Dropping my 2015 F80 M3 for a 2015 991 3.4



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:34 PM.