Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: In favor of a separate 991.2 forum?
Yes
104
56.22%
No
76
41.08%
Neutral
5
2.70%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

In favor of a separate 991.2 forum?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2015, 08:51 PM
  #46  
oalvarez
Three Wheelin'
 
oalvarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,341
Received 54 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

i voted no before even reading this thread. i'm a moderator at an italian motorcycle forum and this kind of thing comes up all the time. the two cars will share parts, they're both 991s, and forum members CAN learn and be taught to label their headers as they should (991.2). IF they don't, that's where the MODERATORS are SUPPOSED to step in to either re-title the subject lines, or provide guidance, support, and direction as needed. i think it's good to keep the community together as opposed to thinning it out, at least at this juncture.
Old 12-12-2015, 09:00 PM
  #47  
STG
Race Director
 
STG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 0
Received 200 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Not that they care all that much. They're clearly on a mission- sorry, e-mission- and the 911 just ain't all that anymore.

Yup! Sad, but true.
Old 12-12-2015, 09:40 PM
  #48  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

It isn't there fault. They have to comply with big brother. I can see the day when petroleum vehicles will only be driven on weekends and special events due to regulations. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/...climate-accord
Old 12-12-2015, 10:14 PM
  #49  
Dude174
Racer
 
Dude174's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I voted no because there are other parts of the car that are the same that doesn't warrant its own subforum. The cayenne forum is the original, facelift AND the new plus the newest facelift. If you guys are so offended by the .2 talk that it shoots your wheels off, just don't read the ones pertaining to it. Aren't we all one big family?
Old 12-13-2015, 12:18 AM
  #50  
bernpep
Instructor
 
bernpep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Except this is just not true, as I pointed out in the last debate about this topic. The two motors share almost no identical parts at all. There is an article I linked to in that thread that compares the motors and outlines the differences. Pistons, valve trains, cams, intake, exhausts, new cylinder liners, new crankcase, new oil pan, new oil pump, everything is new. And the turbo is obviously a big change that will make the motor perform very differently. And the RWS is new. And the electric power steering has been revamped, and the PCM is all new, and the drive mode selector and modes are new, and...

Yes, they're both flat sixes of very similar design, which one would expect, but it is a new motor with new components throughout.
Yes, NEW engine. Not yet proven. Who knows?
Old 12-13-2015, 01:06 AM
  #51  
CP911
Rennlist Member
 
CP911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

997.1 and 997.2 are lumped together despite the "drastic" change in motor between .1 and .2. No one is complaining there. It sounds like the purists are just butt hurt over the turbo-only 911 and want to make a fuss over nothing. It's still a 991 and therefore one forum is appropriate.
Old 12-13-2015, 01:15 AM
  #52  
aggie57
Rennlist Member
 
aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,332
Received 2,871 Likes on 1,512 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CP911
997.1 and 997.2 are lumped together despite the "drastic" change in motor between .1 and .2. No one is complaining there. It sounds like the purists are just butt hurt over the turbo-only 911 and want to make a fuss over nothing. It's still a 991 and therefore one forum is appropriate.
Exactly. I voted no because of this. Had a 997.1 and a 997.2. Quite different cars. Different engine, different transmission (in the auto at least), different sheet metal, different console and PCM. But both are still 997s and a 991.2 is still a 991.
Old 12-13-2015, 02:41 AM
  #53  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,872 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CP911
997.1 and 997.2 are lumped together despite the "drastic" change in motor between .1 and .2. No one is complaining there. It sounds like the purists are just butt hurt over the turbo-only 911 and want to make a fuss over nothing. It's still a 991 and therefore one forum is appropriate.
Please. What a load of crap. The motivation for splitting the forum would simply to make it more efficient for members to share information relevant to them. Given the significant difference in these cars, there are going to be a lot of threads that are only relevant to one of the two owner groups. That's the reason why it might make sense to split them. Nothing more than that.
Old 12-13-2015, 08:32 AM
  #54  
gloom
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
gloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 102
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
The motivation for splitting the forum would simply to make it more efficient for members to share information relevant to them. Given the significant difference in these cars, there are going to be a lot of threads that are only relevant to one of the two owner groups. That's the reason why it might make sense to split them. Nothing more than that.
Agreed. It's a usability matter more than anything else.
Old 12-13-2015, 09:32 AM
  #55  
911sccab
Racer
 
911sccab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 404
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

United we stand, divided we fall.

There is so much overlap in the ownership experience of the .1 and .2 that the difference is like, well, 0.1!

Thee are truly different variations of the same car. As more .2's hit the road the novelty will fade and the common traits will naturally unite the groups.
Old 12-13-2015, 10:44 AM
  #56  
c_Gio
Burning Brakes
 
c_Gio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The guys who have a .2 ought to weigh in.... If I had a .2, it may be very handy to drill into the most topical info. Doesn't matter which is *better*. They are both best! Both 911. Forums are about info, chatter, and (for me) learning about my car from others. The more specific the Intel is to my model, the more helpful & relevent the forum is. And I think, helpful/relevent is the lifeblood of this whole deal: lose that and the membership dies. Nothing sadder than watching a forum dry up because they lost relevance/community interest.

In other words, if another forum takes the lead on helpful .2 conversation, that's the beginning of the end for the ones unable to keep up.

Afterthought: votes speak for themselves. Give the people what they want
Old 12-13-2015, 10:47 AM
  #57  
stealthboy
Burning Brakes
 
stealthboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I voted no because I feel like there is still enough similarity between the two that both camps would still gain knowledge from each other. When you split boards, you lose volume on the old one (of course), so we may lose the critical mass needed to really keep things going. This is just my humble opinion.
Old 12-13-2015, 10:55 AM
  #58  
sandbar
Instructor
 
sandbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by stealthboy
I voted no because I feel like there is still enough similarity between the two that both camps would still gain knowledge from each other. When you split boards, you lose volume on the old one (of course), so we may lose the critical mass needed to really keep things going. This is just my humble opinion.
While I appreciate the desire to add a sub forum, what you stated is why I voted no as well.
Old 12-13-2015, 12:13 PM
  #59  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,986
Likes: 0
Received 11,718 Likes on 5,120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STG991
I think this must be the most active Porsche board there is, isn't it?
I believe the 991 GT3/RS board is.
Old 12-13-2015, 12:16 PM
  #60  
997s07
Burning Brakes
 
997s07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

A lot of people here have real issues ignoring threads that are irrelevant / uninteresting to them. I have been following rennlist for a much longer time than I have been participating. This 991 forum has some characters that will essentially dry it up. I'm from the GT forums, I've learned a lot about my 997 GT3s from 996 GT guys. There are so many OT threads here, whether watches, Steve McQueen, etc., than I've ever seen anywhere else. People ask for help, and more than often get śhit on. So many non value adding posts, people chiming in just to chime in, and this thread is no different.

Get over it. The .1 & .2 are 991 cars. With many many similarities. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't know Porsche.


Quick Reply: In favor of a separate 991.2 forum?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:13 PM.