Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 "undisguised"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2015 | 09:06 PM
  #541  
MKW's Avatar
MKW
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 144
From: Norcal
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Only 911 generation that I truly disliked. The 964 is just an awful looking car IMO. It looked like what Chrysler would have done if they bought the rights to produce the 911 at the time.
Its one of those things that as one who personally transitioned from the last " old school 911 " i.e., no power steering, no ABS , no airbags...to the " new and finally modern " 964,can understand . Yes it was faster and safer but also lost the lithe feel and the heavy plastic front and back that replaced the accordian bumpers made it look the way it felt !

I hear the market is warming to the 964,..probable buyers may be those who were still in preschool back then !

Same goes for the millennial love of all things " mid-century " right now incl the cheap plastic " potato chip " chairs that was the sign of living on the wrong side of the tracks and the craptastic made to fall apart ranch or Palm Springs style houses to meet the post WW2 needs. Yecch then and yecch now !
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 04:29 AM
  #542  
Chris3963's Avatar
Chris3963
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 1,263
From: Antipodes
Default

The Singer 964 is the most achingly beautiful Porsche you can buy today IMHO. If I could afford one, I would do it in a heart beat.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 01:37 AM
  #543  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
I agree. I think the 997.2 taillights are the worst ever put on a 911. I think the whole tail looks bad on that car. Like a dog trying to tuck its tail between its legs.
LMFAO Archimedes. Like a dog trying to tuck its tail between its legs. OMG. I have to agree with you. But that is so funny as heck!
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 01:44 AM
  #544  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by NoGaBiker
My last Turbo was a 996TT X50 (450hp/467tq), with headers and exhaust. A wicked, powerful beast that was a blast to drive. Immediately before buying it I had a beautiful Boxster S for a few years.

One day my wife said to me, "You know, I don't see you going out to drive just for fun with the Turbo like you did with previous 911s or your Boxster. Have you just not bonded with it?"

I thought about it and she was right. The power was addictive and amazing, and when I did go to the mountains and flog it it was a remarkably good sportscar on our amazing southeastern mountain roads. But in the end, I didn't enjoy driving it as much around town as I had previous NA Porsches. Every day I walk to the garage and choose a set of keys for what I want to drive that day. It includes a built Wrangler that's a lot of fun, and a 68 Cadillac convertible. I had gotten to where I was driving the Porsche about once a week, and rarely taking it to the mountains.

So I went into the dealer to buy a new 991TT, figuring the advances in the chassis and power delivery were the answer. In the process, I wound up testing a full-boat 991S with all the boxes checked including PDCC (no powerkit or Ceramics). That's when I realized, "Duh! It's the turbo-vs-NA thingy that's got you going ho-hum. Why not order a GTS, keep the Turbo a little just to make sure, and then sell Turbo if your instincts were right."

So I did. I never drove the Turbo again after getting the GTS. Sure, I miss the 150 ft-lb delta in torque occasionally. But honestly, I'm just enjoying working the 'box and the throttle so much more, and hearing those glorious sounds on acceleration or the burble/cough/sputter/blat on overrun after a downshift. Sold the Turbo last month and haven't looked back.

Yeah, 991TTs are different beasts than 996TTs, but it wasn't lack of power or even lag that spurred my decision, and the 991TT didn't solve the other problems.

Of course, YMMV and all that.

Cheers
I had a Nissan GTR twin turbo black edition. That car wold suck your eyeballs in you head. Than I drove a NA Carrera S and did the same thing. Actually traded for a GTS. Still slower than my GTR but the sounds and refinement I loved better in the Carrera.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 10:31 AM
  #545  
jimbo1111's Avatar
jimbo1111
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 38
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by stratocaster69
I had a Nissan GTR twin turbo black edition. That car wold suck your eyeballs in you head. Than I drove a NA Carrera S and did the same thing. Actually traded for a GTS. Still slower than my GTR but the sounds and refinement I loved better in the Carrera.
I wouldn't bet on that! From experience, that is.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 01:48 PM
  #546  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 208
From: FL
Default Very insecure here ...

Originally Posted by cloud9blue
All I have to say is that almost all of the overwhelming negative responses here are from brand new 991.1 owners with less than a year of forum history. Just seems like a bit of insecurity is in play here



Wrong for the 1,000+ time ... Not insecure here

Sorry, missed the u's!
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 06:51 PM
  #547  
CommonProject's Avatar
CommonProject
Advanced
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 76
Likes: 2
Default

The front looks better to me, more aggressive. However, the rear is soooo badddddd. What were they thinking.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 07:04 PM
  #548  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
I wouldn't bet on that! From experience, that is.
Wouldn't but on what. Enquiring minds need to know lol No the Carrera didnt have they eyeball effect. Kinda said that wrong lol
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 09:27 PM
  #549  
jimbo1111's Avatar
jimbo1111
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 38
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by stratocaster69
Wouldn't but on what. Enquiring minds need to know lol No the Carrera didnt have they eyeball effect. Kinda said that wrong lol
NA cars feel different "slower" than turbos. Less torque but more hp in higher revs. I usually rev out the engine to just before the fuel cut out. In the GTS its at 8k. True story. GTR lost. If you want details pm me.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 09:41 PM
  #550  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
NA cars feel different "slower" than turbos. Less torque but more hp in higher revs. I usually rev out the engine to just before the fuel cut out. In the GTS its at 8k. True story. GTR lost. If you want details pm me.
See, I have learnt something. I don't really drive fast. Just like the 0 to 60 to get around people. Or launch once in a blue moon with no traffic.

I sure will P.M. you. If I am thinking what u are going to tell me is what I am thinking lol. I am stoked lol
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2015 | 12:19 AM
  #551  
n4v4nod's Avatar
n4v4nod
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 1,866
From: PNW
Default

Hope this isn't a repost. Looks like this is the first official image of the 991.2?

Reply
Old Sep 1, 2015 | 12:24 AM
  #552  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

The dead give away is the bbq grill on the back. Nose up attitude for the weenies to slide off lol. Just kidding man. We are all on the same team here. No harm no fowl and cool pic!
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2015 | 12:46 AM
  #553  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
I wouldn't bet on that! From experience, that is.
You're not seriously claiming that a Carrera GTS is faster than a Nissan GTR, are you?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2015 | 12:51 AM
  #554  
stratocaster69's Avatar
stratocaster69
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 882
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
You're not seriously claiming that a Carrera GTS is faster than a Nissa GTR, are you?
I am waiting to hear back. But as I told him, the GTR would kill it in the 1/4. I know on the other forum some guys were posting 10.9 to 11.3 second runs I am almost positive. With stock cars.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2015 | 12:56 AM
  #555  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Likes: 3,919
Default

Originally Posted by stratocaster69
I am waiting to hear back. But as I told him, the GTR would kill it in the 1/4. I know on the other forum some guys were posting 10.9 to 11.3 second runs I am almost positive. With stock cars.
The GTR is a second quicker than the GTS to 60 and almost a second quicker through the quarter mile. It's not even close.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:46 AM.