G-Force gauge as a driving tool
#17
I didn't even realize that the G-meter kept track of maximums. So when I was out this morning I had to check what they were. This 2014 TTS with 2600 miles on it (2000 of that on winter tires). No track driving, just having some fun every now and then.
L&R - both 0.98
Braking - 0.94
Acceleration - 1.30!! Launch Control FTW
L&R - both 0.98
Braking - 0.94
Acceleration - 1.30!! Launch Control FTW
Last edited by chuck911; 04-13-2014 at 01:51 PM. Reason: link
#20
Its an excellent tool to record, or document success - or failure - to quote Senna:
"Each driver has its limit. My limit is a little bit further than other’s"
Or Carl Edwards of NASCAR after spinning at Michigan:
"We broke something, I think it was traction…"
It won't measure failure - just success right up to the point of impending doom...
or, as Buddy Baker put it best:
"He ran out of talent about halfway through the corner"
"Each driver has its limit. My limit is a little bit further than other’s"
Or Carl Edwards of NASCAR after spinning at Michigan:
"We broke something, I think it was traction…"
It won't measure failure - just success right up to the point of impending doom...
or, as Buddy Baker put it best:
"He ran out of talent about halfway through the corner"
#21
I didn't even realize that the G-meter kept track of maximums. So when I was out this morning I had to check what they were. This 2014 TTS with 2600 miles on it (2000 of that on winter tires). No track driving, just having some fun every now and then.
L&R - both 0.98
Braking - 0.94
Acceleration - 1.30!! Launch Control FTW
L&R - both 0.98
Braking - 0.94
Acceleration - 1.30!! Launch Control FTW
If it is as you indicate, this is exceptional!
#23
Anyway, the 1.3 g is a peak value. The average value will show more deceleration, i.e. it stops from 100 mph faster than it will get there. But that 1.3 g surge off the line, wow!
#24
Also, note that with the engine in back and with much wider tires in back (305s vs 245s), grip for acceleration is likely to be greater than grip for breaking.
#25
no, not really useful. In racing, on a track, with racecar, we use TraqDash data sometimes to assess grip and so forth. Mostly after we pit. The only time I can think of on-track is when in very long sweepers. (like the lightbulb at NJMP).....occasionally, I'll reference it to see how my tires are doing.
#26
With those 1.24 numbers was the rear sliding at some point. It seems like once pushed to the limit there must be a cut off point like maybe 1.3 mentioned earlier . When conditions are ideal- good road surface and sticky tires what is the highest value that has been recorded for lateral force. I realize that the gauge is not a something to watch while driving like oil temp. or rpm but it is interesting to look at after a alpine run.
#28
I can routinely pull numbers close to 1.3 G similar to what Ma 991 post shows and I run street tires and am not that great of a driver so I always figured the G meter was not really all that accurate.
Engine in back or not I get much higher numbers breaking then accelerating.
Engine in back or not I get much higher numbers breaking then accelerating.