Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Apples v Oranges : 991 C2 v 135/335

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2013, 07:27 PM
  #31  
zirrah
Drifting
 
zirrah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,039
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MAHack
Originally Posted by zirrah
The 335 lacks the edge that Porsche's have. For BMW's you gotta look at the M cars, especially the M3.
I just sold my 2010 M3. Even it lacked the edge that the 991S has. That V8 did make some great sounds but the hp is similar and the M3 is 700 lbs heavier. Comfort on a long trip could be a toss up however.
Agreed actually. The E46 had more of an edge than the E92. Great engine in the E92 though.
Old 03-01-2013, 10:13 PM
  #32  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArashApollo
Wait what?? Even an old old ford fiesta does 30-50 faster than 12.6s. Am I reading this wrong?
I assumed that was a mistype. My stock f150 4wd crew cab can beat that 30-50 time at half throttle. I checked today. 11.4 s.
Old 03-01-2013, 10:17 PM
  #33  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArashApollo
Wait what?? Even an old old ford fiesta does 30-50 faster than 12.6s. Am I reading this wrong?
I assumed that was a mistype. My stock f150 4wd crew cab can beat that 30-50 time at half throttle. I checked today. 11.4 s. unofficial using an iPhone stopwatch and a ford speedometer. But still. No way a base 991 even driven by my 78 year old mother is that slow.
Old 03-02-2013, 03:24 AM
  #34  
Gruson
Instructor
 
Gruson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I drove a 2011 M3 and 2012 335. It has been a year since I drove them and there is no comparison. The Porsche is much more fun and exciting. I was surprised that the M felt boring in comparison to a 997 or 991. I remembered it being more fun.

Plus it felt a lot more crammed than a Porsche. The 335 was about the same but it didn't have the sport seats so actually felt more comfy than the M.

Porsche wins.
Old 03-02-2013, 05:14 AM
  #35  
ww007
Instructor
 
ww007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie140
Wifey drives a 335i cab.

It's horrid. Feels like prison.
I beg to differ. I had a 2011 335i convertible with M-sport package and it was a great car. Awesome low end torque, excellent handling. The ride was a bit harsh but that was mainly due to the M-sport package and run-flat tires (dumbest decision ever by BMW, btw). And I loved the fact that it looked like a coupe with the top up.

I'm now patiently awaiting delivery of my C2S. I'd probably still be driving the BMW if I hadn't totaled it
Old 03-02-2013, 11:09 AM
  #36  
kcarrigan
2nd Gear
 
kcarrigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSST
I assumed that was a mistype. My stock f150 4wd crew cab can beat that 30-50 time at half throttle. I checked today. 11.4 s. unofficial using an iPhone stopwatch and a ford speedometer. But still. No way a base 991 even driven by my 78 year old mother is that slow.
As a base 991 owner, I regret to inform you that it's not a misprint. A combination of engine mapping and extremely tall gearing make the in-gear performance pretty poor. I've written a lot about it over at 6speed, but long story short, Porsche just got the mid-range performance of the car dead wrong. A new Boxster S (and my previous 2011 Spyder) has more around town performance.

Now don't get me wrong, I like the car a lot and it is a huge step on from the 335 and M3 I've had previously. But, don't be naive about it's performance around town, it will be a step back from those torquey BMWs. I wish someone had told me that before I had ordered my car; I still would have bought it, I just would have done so with my eyes open.

Now that I've read this post back, it sounds more negative that I had intended. So heres a track video to show why my next car will also be a 911. : )
Old 03-02-2013, 07:28 PM
  #37  
ArashApollo
Instructor
 
ArashApollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CA, NM
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kcarrigan
As a base 991 owner, I regret to inform you that it's not a misprint. A combination of engine mapping and extremely tall gearing make the in-gear performance pretty poor. I've written a lot about it over at 6speed, but long story short, Porsche just got the mid-range performance of the car dead wrong. A new Boxster S (and my previous 2011 Spyder) has more around town performance.

Now don't get me wrong, I like the car a lot and it is a huge step on from the 335 and M3 I've had previously. But, don't be naive about it's performance around town, it will be a step back from those torquey BMWs. I wish someone had told me that before I had ordered my car; I still would have bought it, I just would have done so with my eyes open.

Now that I've read this post back, it sounds more negative that I had intended. So heres a track video to show why my next car will also be a 911. : )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5_fpzvWlSI
Is it April fools day or something? I regret to inform you that a base 911 (991) does NOT do 30mph-50mph in 12.6seconds unless you are coasting downhill or something. Maybe you're driving in 7th gear? 12.6s is more like a 1/4 mile time for a C2. Am I still misreading something here?

Sorry to steer away from the point, but I do believe the driving dynamics of a sports car vs a sports sedan is very different, regardless of power. Whatever you think you will miss in the 335i will be more than drowned out by a 911.
Old 03-02-2013, 10:06 PM
  #38  
cmb13
Racer
 
cmb13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 496
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

It's a top gear acceleration test. It's irrelevant.
Old 03-02-2013, 11:24 PM
  #39  
fast1
Race Car
 
fast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,899
Received 221 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cmb13
It's a top gear acceleration test. It's irrelevant.
and meaningless. I thought that this was a Porsche forum but I'm getting to learn about Vettes, BMWs, and Lexus. Rennlist is becoming the UN of car forums.
Old 03-03-2013, 06:13 AM
  #40  
MacAna
Racer
 
MacAna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: South Africa
Posts: 276
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

My DD was a 335i Coupe for about 3yrs, I then moved up to the M3 Cab which I've been driving daily for about 14mths now.

I just ordered the 991S (my first Porsche) and while the plan was to keep the M3 as my DD, based on what I've read, and the test drives I've done, I fear I won't be using the M3 as much as I was planning to.

Incidentally, the 335i is an awesome sports sedan, in fact I found it a bit better as a DD than the M3 (which has a Remus exhaust and is a much "rougher" car to drive daily), but it isn't exhilarating like the M3, and I expect that excitement/exhilaration to go another notch up with the 991.

I haven't heard of anyone being disappointed switching form any BMW to a 991, but that doesn't mean some of the Bavarian cars aren't excellent, and I think the 335 (especially Coupe) was one of their best.
Old 03-03-2013, 10:28 AM
  #41  
SSST
Drifting
 
SSST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bastrop By God Texas
Posts: 2,255
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ArashApollo
ISorry to steer away from the point, but I do believe the driving dynamics of a sports car vs a sports sedan is very different, regardless of power.
Nobody is claiming otherwise.

I think we can all agree on that.



Quick Reply: Apples v Oranges : 991 C2 v 135/335



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:53 AM.