Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Has anyone ordered the Carrera S 991 IPD Plenum?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 12:48 PM
  #16  
chuckbdc's Avatar
chuckbdc
Race Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 346
From: Maryland USA
Default

Originally Posted by TTCarrera
We agree. The RS60 Spyder came with the extra exhaust throughput over the standard 981S. That's why I added the plenum and the ECU remap and got the "maybe 10 HP", per your recognition above.
I had an RS-60 and can assure you that the advertised increase in power over the Boxter S had nothing to do with the sport exhaust, which was an option for any Boxter in 2008.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #17  
chuckbdc's Avatar
chuckbdc
Race Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 346
From: Maryland USA
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Was just wondering, for the sake of argument say, if maybe a lot of us hold the underlying assumption that every motor model Porsche builds is somehow a perfectly optimized example of all that can be done at a given price point- which often seems to be the unspoken assumption- and if maybe that assumption is not so well founded. What I'm getting at is that it very well could also be that Porsche KNOWS it would only take a simple part change to gain 15 hp,.....
Everything mass produced by a profit-making company worth its salt is optimized (to what )can be done at a given price point.

But looking at the many internal engine mods needed to get to an additional 30 or so HP out of a 400HP 3.8 normally aspirated engine, it seems very unlikely that just a plenum could get half way there. Modern production methods at leading edge companies no longer leave smoothing castings, porting and polishing and matching component weights on the cutting room floor - for high perfomance cars (optimized for power or mileage or both- like modern Porsches). Put it another way- you already paid for that.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 01:13 PM
  #18  
Dr_KarlB's Avatar
Dr_KarlB
Pro
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 1
Default

Long ago on another forum this same discussion came up...

Turns out that a 10 HP increase on a 996 was about the same effect on performance as driving with 1/3 Tank of gas compared to a full tank....

Its cheaper than a plenum too and doesnt void your warranty :-)
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 01:23 PM
  #19  
rpilot's Avatar
rpilot
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 723
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Dr_KarlB
Long ago on another forum this same discussion came up...

Turns out that a 10 HP increase on a 996 was about the same effect on performance as driving with 1/3 Tank of gas compared to a full tank....

Its cheaper than a plenum too and doesnt void your warranty :-)
So, basically what the Doc is saying is.. If you long for the plenum stuff for your 991 , try eating less and exercising more first.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 01:48 PM
  #20  
chuckbdc's Avatar
chuckbdc
Race Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 346
From: Maryland USA
Default

That principle is evident in F1. But riding around on fumes on the street may be going a bit far, or less far, or something. So, if the plenum fits, wear it.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 02:24 PM
  #21  
chuck911's Avatar
chuck911
Race Car
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 62
Default

How many plenums will I need to make up for the backseat beer fridge?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 03:09 PM
  #22  
ThePartsMan's Avatar
ThePartsMan
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Default

Hi Chuck,

With all due respect, I do hope that you have considered a "concealed" beer dispensing option just to keep it legal. We could start with this and go from there.

Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 03:17 PM
  #23  
chuck911's Avatar
chuck911
Race Car
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 62
Default

When it comes to beer (H) I hold concealment secondary to quality. How's that thing going to maintain adequate carbonation?? Obviously we're talking party pig here.

Last edited by chuck911; Jan 28, 2014 at 06:51 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2012 | 03:26 PM
  #24  
chuckbdc's Avatar
chuckbdc
Race Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 346
From: Maryland USA
Default

Originally Posted by ThePartsMan
Hi Chuck,

With all due respect, I do hope that you have considered a "concealed" beer dispensing option just to keep it legal. We could start with this and go from there.

I hope there is not another application for that where one sits on it on long trips and... (see Garry post re finding gas stations with restrooms). In any case, make sure you wash it carefully before using.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #25  
HotLap's Avatar
HotLap
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 295
Likes: 1
From: SoCal - Ventura County
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Was just wondering, for the sake of argument say, if maybe a lot of us hold the underlying assumption that every motor model Porsche builds is somehow a perfectly optimized example of all that can be done at a given price point- which often seems to be the unspoken assumption- and if maybe that assumption is not so well founded. What I'm getting at is that it very well could also be that Porsche KNOWS it would only take a simple part change to gain 15 hp, BUT that if they did that then it would set ripples in motion that would spread across their entire marketing program where at some point suddenly it becomes VERY EXPENSIVE to keep,say, the GT2 or Turbo S an appropriate number of hp above the model just below.

If this is true it would explain a lot of things. It would explain what Gary just mentioned about an engine being initially overbuilt so as to facilitate future hp gains. They get big economies of scale doing that up front. Then they get big marketing profits by dialing in incremental hp as the years and models go by. Virtually all those gains COULD have been done from the beginning. But that would leave marketing dollars on the table. And, in fairness, they learn a LOT more about reliability taking the incremental approach.
Chuck, I think you're on to something here...for years we've seen many of the manufacturer's do this with their engines, take the Mustang and Camaro, excellent examples of manufacturers' "tweaking" intake/exhaust/ignition mapping, etc., to add that incremental hp over the life of the model (to fuel additional sales) and help keep interest...while not changing the basic engine a bit. Well Spoken!
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #26  
chuck911's Avatar
chuck911
Race Car
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by HotLap
Chuck, I think you're on to something here...for years we've seen many of the manufacturer's do this with their engines, take the Mustang and Camaro, excellent examples of manufacturers' "tweaking" intake/exhaust/ignition mapping, etc., to add that incremental hp over the life of the model (to fuel additional sales) and help keep interest...while not changing the basic engine a bit. Well Spoken!
Thanks. And when you think about it, it really is very strange that here in the United States we all seem to have forgotten that the business of business is business. Which when first quoted everyone knew that business means THE PURSUIT OF PROFITS! Not the optimization of the thing being made, but the optimization of the PROFIT ON the thing being made. And THAT is what leaves room for the aftermarket and race tuner guys to come along and make a profit selling stuff that fills in the little niches like plenums and backseat beer (H) fridges.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 02:28 PM
  #27  
GSIRM3's Avatar
GSIRM3
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 74
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by TTCarrera
Then Porsche forgot to tell me when they continued to honor it.
What type of engine related warranty claim did you make that was honored by Porsche?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 06:04 PM
  #28  
solomonschris's Avatar
solomonschris
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 5
From: Southern Maryland
Default

I am reminded of a quote of Bruce Anderson's which I can only paraphrase. "The problem with modding a 911 is that often the new part isn't as good as the one you removed."
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #29  
STG's Avatar
STG
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,799
Likes: 208
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
Was just wondering, for the sake of argument say, if maybe a lot of us hold the underlying assumption that every motor model Porsche builds is somehow a perfectly optimized example of all that can be done at a given price point- which often seems to be the unspoken assumption- and if maybe that assumption is not so well founded. What I'm getting at is that it very well could also be that Porsche KNOWS it would only take a simple part change to gain 15 hp, BUT that if they did that then it would set ripples in motion that would spread across their entire marketing program where at some point suddenly it becomes VERY EXPENSIVE to keep,say, the GT2 or Turbo S an appropriate number of hp above the model just below. If this is true it would explain a lot of things. It would explain what Gary just mentioned about an engine being initially overbuilt so as to facilitate future hp gains. They get big economies of scale doing that up front. Then they get big marketing profits by dialing in incremental hp as the years and models go by. Virtually all those gains COULD have been done from the beginning. But that would leave marketing dollars on the table. And, in fairness, they learn a LOT more about reliability taking the incremental approach.

Was looking up info on the IPD Plenum after thinking about getting one. Found the above theory by Chuck very interesting, and reading about the new GTS even more interesting.

Any comments from you mechanical guys?



http://flatsixes.com/cars/porsche-99...s-new-991-gts/


Quote:


3. How the Powerkit makes its 30 extra horsepower over the standard engine: I was curious how the Powerkit engine made its 430 horsepower versus the standard Carrera S 400 horses. Porsche gave us the opportunity to sit down with Friederich Seiler, the company's Engine Tuning Engineering Manager. If anyone could tell us, it'd be this guy! Seiler estimated that the Powerkit's revised intake manifold was responsible for somewhere around 50% of the power gain, replacing the engine's standard plastic intake for a custom made complicated dual-plenum aluminum intake. It is difficult to describe in words, but there is a large flapper at the top of the intake tract to keep the left bank separate from the right bank until higher RPM, and then a little flapper in each of the cylinder runners that opens up to take advantage of oscillating tube pressure at high RPM to provide a less restrictive flow to each cylinder above . The way it was described, it basically allows the air that is pushed back from the closing of an intake valve to flow into other open cylinders, rather than providing a pressure differential that prevents high flow from entering each cylinder unimpeded. This system is said to help promote torque through shorter intake runners at low RPM, and then when open, allows more horsepower at higher RPM. Hopefully this cutaway diagram will help.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2014 | 07:58 PM
  #30  
OMG Noooooo....'s Avatar
OMG Noooooo....
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Silverstone, Great Britain.
Default

Originally Posted by STG991
Was looking up info on the IPD Plenum after thinking about getting one. Found the above theory by Chuck very interesting, and reading about the new GTS even more interesting
I was thinking the same thing..

Most mass produced products are built around compromise, there is always room for development and improvement by small specialist companies. Induction is just as important as exhaust.....
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:03 PM.