Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C&D road test & comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2012 | 04:54 PM
  #31  
rodsky's Avatar
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 881
From: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 911dev
Ha, that is laughable. Uninformed posts like this make me feel like I'm back on the m3post or NAGTROC forum.

The 991 is a street car whereas the gt3/RS is a street built car meant to handle track duty. Any way you slice it the GT cars will withstand track usage far better than the non-GT 991 ever will. Any car can have issues at the track, however, the 991 in non-GT form will have more. The brakes are not up to repeated track usage nor is the suspension to name just two items. This is simple fact.
I dont think his post was laughable or uninformed - he even said that the .1 or .2 GT3's were better track cars than Carrera's of any ilk. No one would deny that. He is simply buying a car that is fun for him on the street or on the track and that happens to be a 991. Most 911's can handle pretty good track duty. GT3's obviously better. But a 991 will last more than a lap - perhaps even so far as two.
Old 01-05-2012 | 05:07 PM
  #32  
911dev's Avatar
911dev
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 8
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally Posted by rodsky
I dont think his post was laughable or uninformed - he even said that the .1 or .2 GT3's were better track cars than Carrera's of any ilk. No one would deny that. He is simply buying a car that is fun for him on the street or on the track and that happens to be a 991. Most 911's can handle pretty good track duty. GT3's obviously better. But a 991 will last more than a lap - perhaps even so far as two.
Okay, maybe 2, let's go 3, geeezz.

After re-reading his post, you're right,. I read it wrong, my bad!!! I thought he said that he doubts the gt3 is superior to the 991 at the track.

Sorry, sorry, and sorry.
Old 01-05-2012 | 05:58 PM
  #33  
Salj's Avatar
Salj
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 493
Likes: 137
From: Austin TX
Default

Sooo much emotion here... I'll let you know how it runs after break-in March 24/25 @Sebring. btw, I love Porsche GT cars...
Old 01-05-2012 | 08:09 PM
  #34  
clembo's Avatar
clembo
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 10
From: MA & FL
Default

Salj- if my car is delivered by 3/24 I'll meet you there. I ordered a Stick car which will be built the first week of March so the dealer can't set a delivery date yet. Ordered in SWFL as well, maybe from the same place, enjoy your car.
Old 01-05-2012 | 10:51 PM
  #35  
tgcrun's Avatar
tgcrun
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 440
Default

Originally Posted by allegretto
first point is subjective

second point pure speculation without an ounce of proof

third point, an admitted guess

A while back Porsche had a look and feel that stood out from the crowd. Wasn't necessarily the "best" at anything but making users smile. True enthusiasts owned them because of all that. It was quirky, hard to handle, but true believers got what they expected.

Now... might as well be a Jag or A-M. But for your $135K you better be prepared to be pistol-whipped in performance category and depend more on "exclusivity", whatever that's worth. I'm afraid that VW is now banking on cachet since it's lacking what made the marque great in the first place. It's not that much different from many other GT's. That's not necessarily a bad thing, just not what made it famous.
Please note that points 1 and 2 were prefaced by "In my opinion", which is exactly why I will never own either the Chevy or the Nissan. I'm sure plenty of people love those cars, I'm just not one of them. I'm planning to order a lightly optioned 991S Cab at a cost of around $117,000. For me, spending that kind of money on a Porsche makes way more sense than spending a tad less on a Chevy or a Nissan. I'll just make sure I don't get into a drag race with either of them. That way I won't have to worry about any "pistol-whippings".
Old 01-06-2012 | 04:34 AM
  #36  
rodsky's Avatar
rodsky
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 881
From: West Los Angeles & Truckee, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 911dev
Okay, maybe 2, let's go 3, geeezz.

After re-reading his post, you're right,. I read it wrong, my bad!!! I thought he said that he doubts the gt3 is superior to the 991 at the track.

Sorry, sorry, and sorry.
No harm no foul, All's good
Old 01-06-2012 | 10:21 AM
  #37  
Salj's Avatar
Salj
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 493
Likes: 137
From: Austin TX
Default

Hey Clembo, good deal. I ended up ordering from Suncoast. Mar 24/25 is with Chin @Sebring.
Old 01-06-2012 | 07:55 PM
  #38  
clembo's Avatar
clembo
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 10
From: MA & FL
Default

Salj - Ft Myers. My car probably will not be in by then, but one never knows.
Old 01-06-2012 | 11:01 PM
  #39  
Waxer's Avatar
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 818
From: Central New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by allegretto
all these "differences" are somewhat humorous.

First - they are irrelevant on the street. All recent P-cars have more than enough to defy the Laws of Physics and Man on the street. Throw in traffic...

Two- Salj, you'd better be a better driver than the guy in the 997 (or 993 for that matter) or you'll just be pointing by at slightly greater speed.

If I had a .2 GT-3 you will have a very hard time keeping up. And then, there is always a faster car. A Z-06 and a good driver will leave you for dead. All this stuff... the only winners are the manufacturers and the nonsense is kept up by the Rags.

At $130K it is overpriced... no doubt.
+1

0-60 times largely a product of LC w/PDK.

The electric nannies are off the charts on the test car. The only vehicle w/ more electric nannies was the space shuttle.

Read between the lines. It's a great performer w/ less driver needed. It's big, less "intimate" (read less like a sports car) and has left behind or damn near eliminated the characteristics that defined the 911 since day 1.

Porsche is targeting a new market ala' Jag, Aston, GTR..performance 2+2s.

Bad?no. Depends on what you want. It's a clear evolution.

I'd be wlling to bet 0-60 times are real close for 6spd 991 and 997s. I bet the Ring times are close too. I don't buy their 14sec claimed difference apples to apples.

If a well optioned 991 is now $130k can't wait to see what the GT3 will go for. Sheesh!
Old 01-07-2012 | 01:21 AM
  #40  
Mspeedster's Avatar
Mspeedster
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 27
Default

What's with all the 991 hate? Aren't we all 911 friends here? While I am amused by how C&D came to their conclusion, I'm never the less glad to see the Porsche 911 proclaimed the best. It's been a while. No doubt in a few years or less it will be leap frogged by something else.
Old 01-08-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #41  
tangram's Avatar
tangram
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 368
Likes: 3
From: Toronto, ON
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
911dev, I'm certainly not trying to minimize the GT3's capabilities. I just get the sense (and maybe I'm wrong) that some owners seem offended that the abilities of the new car are even talked about in the same sentence as the GT3. The bottom line, AFAIC, is that it's pretty impressive that the new run-of-the-mill mass audience 911, details about specific equipment aside, is damn near as fast as the previous generation factory track-oriented car. Whether it's someone's particular cup of tea because of LC, PDK, PCCB's, lack of MT or whatever, is kind of beside the point. That's still quite an accomplishment. And it makes me very curious to see what the forthcoming 991 GT3 will be capable of.
This whole debate is moot unless you regularly track your car and my sense is that this is not the demographic of the 991 forum.

Both are amazing cars but if you are on public roads, not the track, why would anyone honestly care about this minutia? My 993 is 0-60 in 5.6 sec. and it's an absolute blast.
Old 01-27-2012 | 02:44 AM
  #42  
Rushman71's Avatar
Rushman71
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
911dev, I'm certainly not trying to minimize the GT3's capabilities. I just get the sense (and maybe I'm wrong) that some owners seem offended that the abilities of the new car are even talked about in the same sentence as the GT3.
This is always the case every time a new 911 comes along. It's just human nature. People don't like change and they get very emotionally attached to what they have so they take any threat to their own supremacy personally. I'm just glad they make all these wonderful cars so we can argue about these things.
Old 01-27-2012 | 02:15 PM
  #43  
gerenb's Avatar
gerenb
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

I've had a 2006 Cayman S for the last six years and even though it's substantially slower than many of the performance cars on the market, I have never felt a sense of inadequacy. In fact, every time I hit the gas from a red light I notice that everyone one else is way behind me within a few seconds.

I recently ordered a 991 after looking very closely at the competition. For a daily driver, nothing can touch the 991 in its class. It's extremely fast, has an unbelievably sophisticated suspension and looks really, really good. The only downside is the cost. I briefly considered a GTR but it's a very capable, gas guzzling beast that weighs too much and isn't a good daily driver.

Am I afraid of getting the car in its first model year? No. My 2006 Cayman S was a first model year car. It has been the most reliable car I've ever owned.
Old 01-27-2012 | 02:37 PM
  #44  
Mike in CA's Avatar
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 224
From: North Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by gerenb
Am I afraid of getting the car in its first model year? No. My 2006 Cayman S was a first model year car. It has been the most reliable car I've ever owned.
I agree with your POV on this. The issue of first year bugs is overblown IMO, certainly when it comes to a car that's undergone evolutionary changes like the 911 as opposed to a completely new and untested model. My '99 996 and current '09 997.2 were first year cars after major changes and there were/have been no real problems with either, despite warnings at the time. If there are problems, that's what warranties are for.

Besides, all of the 991's major mechanical components, with upgrades, are carryovers from the 997.2. There's nothing off-the-charts new there. Even the new 7 speed manual is just a deriviative of the proven PDK. A stretched wheelbase, new body panels and interior bits, PDCC (proven on the Cayenne and Panamera), even the electro-mechanical steering, are not likely to cause reliability headaches.

There may be other reasons why someone doesn't want a first year 991, but concern over reliability shouldn't be one of them.
Old 01-27-2012 | 02:43 PM
  #45  
street's Avatar
street
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by docfink
Considering its horsepower deficiency, it's amazing how the 991 performs. 3.6 seconds to 60?? That's unreal, folks--and it's not turbocharged, nor is it some 8 liter, 16 cylinder behemoth. It's also more refined than our cars. That's not necessarily a bad thing. The price is bordering on redonkulous, but you get what you pay for, usually.

Comparing my 997.1 to a friend's 997.2, I was underwhelmed and wouldn't consider upgrading, although the increased mileage is something I'd like. But the 991? Maybe when you guys let your's go off lease, I'll have to test drive it and decide!
German horses seem to be bigger, especially Porsche's.


Quick Reply: C&D road test & comparison



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:25 PM.