Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 info from the source!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2011, 08:57 PM
  #46  
mdrums
Race Director
 
mdrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 15,358
Received 179 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Thought PDK S is what is in the twin turbo, which is needed for higher BHP cars?

The Photoshop is pretty cool ... Although I am not loving the front that much ...

I still want to see a 9A1 variant engine in a race car before I buy a GT3 based on it ... 480bhp or not.
If you are questioning the 9A1 durability isn't the Cayman Insterseries running the 9A1 with zero issues the last few years? My 9A1 in my Carrera S is running well at the track. I'd think with less parts, lower center of gravity, no coolant part issues and IMS/RMS seal issues the 9A1 will grow into being accepted as a awesome engine.
Old 01-30-2011, 09:00 PM
  #47  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
quite interesting - what do they say in general about gt1 block removal reasons? i really do not understand, this engine is pretty much flawless, WHY do they want to replace it with 9A1? just for fuel efficiency?

overall nice news, I am getting ready to buy one in 2-3 years anyway and strip my current car for track fun, so to get a 480hp NA car with PDK will be just a freaking dream come true.
Originally Posted by mdrums
If you are questioning the 9A1 durability isn't the Cayman Insterseries running the 9A1 with zero issues the last few years? My 9A1 in my Carrera S is running well at the track. I'd think with less parts, lower center of gravity, no coolant part issues and IMS/RMS seal issues the 9A1 will grow into being accepted as a awesome engine.
With 480bhp? No offense I still want to see a 911 race car cup or RSR compete with one ...
Old 01-30-2011, 09:35 PM
  #48  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,338
Received 1,586 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

No offense I still want to see a 911 race car cup or RSR compete with one ...
+1.

Only years of road cars on track plus CUP cars running the same motor in 12 and 24 hour races will convince me..Not kinda the same special this and that in the CUP cars. The same like now..

Then all the shops have to get used to and learn the motor, setup new tub, etc...

I hope my trusty 'ol 997 will hold together long enough..
Old 01-30-2011, 09:46 PM
  #49  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

I suppose you could argue that if the 9A1 can be turbo charged successfully then it can certainly endure ...

Part of the mystique of the GT3 is it's connection to, and derivation from the GT1, Cup and RSRs ... You could argue that this is an illusion or irrelevant ... I still think it's a factor for me at least ... Let's see what the 991 GT3 brings to this particular game...
Old 01-30-2011, 09:57 PM
  #50  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I still think they will have to work some to extract an additional 40% output from the 9A1 to achieve 480bhp!
I think the 997 with X51 option (like the standard engine on the GTS model) makes 408hp, so it's only around 17.6% away from 480hp.
Old 01-30-2011, 10:00 PM
  #51  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
I think the 997 with X51 option (like the standard engine on the GTS model) makes 408hp SAE Net (Euro bhp measurement higher), so it's only around 15% away from 480bhp (by Euro Measurement).
Freakin iPad ... I meant 20% ... I really can do math ...
Old 01-30-2011, 10:06 PM
  #52  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Freakin iPad ... I meant 20% ... I really can do math ...
Fair enough

BTW, I revised my original post since I think the GTS motor is listed as 408hp in Europe and USA (so not sure why they're using the same standards, while the US rating is usually slightly lower).
Old 01-30-2011, 10:10 PM
  #53  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

I think they are going to have to work hard to find another 72bhp ... Clearly it's possible given the work Porsche have done with the Mezger engine ... Although even that stretches the reliability I can imagine that such an engine may be derived from an 9A1 block but it wil probably need some of the same magic applied to the GT1 block ... All of which were developed for motorsport 1st ...

107bhp/litre vs 126/litre ... I suppose its not beyond belief right?

beers on me!
Old 01-30-2011, 10:17 PM
  #54  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I think they are going to have to work hard to find another 72bhp ... Clearly it's possible given the work Porsche have done with the Mezger engine ... Although even that stretches the reliability I can imagine that such an engine may be derived from an 9A1 block but it wil probably need some of the same magic applied to the GT1 block ... All of which were developed for motorsport 1st ...

107bhp/litre vs 126/litre ... I suppose its not beyond belief right?

beers on me!
I wonder if they plan to increase displacement with the 9A1 GT3. That might allow them to make the quoted 480hp without stratospheric revs and hp/Litre (and without the expensive Ti Conrods). I think a Flat-8 will eventually be in the cards though as it's much easier to go beyond 4.0L with an 8-cyl than a 6-cyl and still maintain reasonably high HP/Litre.
Old 01-30-2011, 10:39 PM
  #55  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
I wonder if they plan to increase displacement with the 9A1 GT3. That might allow them to make the quoted 480hp without stratospheric revs and hp/Litre (and without the expensive Ti Conrods). I think a Flat-8 will eventually be in the cards though as it's much easier to go beyond 4.0L with an 8-cyl than a 6-cyl and still maintain reasonably high HP/Litre.
Can they go to 3.9 or 4.0+?
Old 01-30-2011, 10:55 PM
  #56  
A430v
Racer
 
A430v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCali
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
The GT1 engine is MUCH more expensive to produce - it's about profitability. It will be interesting to see what mods to the 9A1 they employ to create 480hp (Displacement increase?, Ti Conrods?, True Dry Sump?, How high will it rev?).
Originally Posted by GrantG
I wonder if they plan to increase displacement with the 9A1 GT3. That might allow them to make the quoted 480hp without stratospheric revs and hp/Litre (and without the expensive Ti Conrods). I think a Flat-8 will eventually be in the cards though as it's much easier to go beyond 4.0L with an 8-cyl than a 6-cyl and still maintain reasonably high HP/Litre.
The reality is upon us. Part of it is about $$$, but that's not the entire story. You'll never see a flat-8 in a 911. Why?... US regulations require a combined fleet MPG of 34.1 by 2016 and in Europe it's even stricter, at 42+ MPG. Porsche would never achieve this with the Mezger/GT1 block or a flat-8. To meet regulations, switching to the 9A1 engine is inevitable, as is using turbochargers or some type of forced induction to increase power. Look at BMW, all the ///M V-10s and V-8s will be phased out after this generation in favor of forced induction to meet MPG requirements. Sad - but that is the reality upon us.
Old 01-30-2011, 10:58 PM
  #57  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,537
Received 3,441 Likes on 2,248 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by A430v
The reality is upon us. Part of it is about $$$, but that's not the entire story. You'll never see a flat-8 in a 911. Why?... US regulations require a combined fleet MPG of 34.1 by 2016 and in Europe it's even stricter, at 42+ MPG. Porsche would never achieve this with the Mezger/GT1 block or a flat-8. To meet regulations, switching to the 9A1 engine is inevitable, as is using turbochargers or some type of forced induction to increase power. Look at BMW, all the ///M V-10s and V-8s will be phased out after this generation in favor of forced induction to meet MPG requirements. Sad - but that is the reality upon us.
Good points ... But surely the 991 won't be forced induction?
Old 01-30-2011, 11:05 PM
  #58  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A430v
The reality is upon us. Part of it is about $$$, but that's not the entire story. You'll never see a flat-8 in a 911. Why?... US regulations require a combined fleet MPG of 34.1 by 2016 and in Europe it's even stricter, at 42+ MPG. Porsche would never achieve this with the Mezger/GT1 block or a flat-8. To meet regulations, switching to the 9A1 engine is inevitable, as is using turbochargers or some type of forced induction to increase power. Look at BMW, all the ///M V-10s and V-8s will be phased out after this generation in favor of forced induction to meet MPG requirements. Sad - but that is the reality upon us.
The fleet average is computed among all the cars sold by a manufacturer. The number of Flat-8 GT3's would be almost insignificant in the context of all Porsches (including future 4-cyl and hybrid models).
Old 01-30-2011, 11:45 PM
  #59  
A430v
Racer
 
A430v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SoCali
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
Good points ... But surely the 991 won't be forced induction?
Who knows - look at where Audi/BMW/MB are going with forced induction.

Originally Posted by GrantG
The fleet average is computed among all the cars sold by a manufacturer. The number of Flat-8 GT3's would be almost insignificant in the context of all Porsches (including future 4-cyl and hybrid models).
True - but just not cost effective. I doubt Porsche will run 2 different engines for the 911 line.

Enthusiasts like us, always want one thing - but the government typically has other plans, and to stay in business, the manufacturer must meet these regulations.
Old 01-31-2011, 12:07 AM
  #60  
Richie18
Instructor
 
Richie18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

With an automaker like Porsche where the volume of cars is low, Porsche will continue to not meet CAFE regulations and pay a small per vehicle fine just like they have in the past, along with Ferrari, Maserati, Volkswagen and BMW.
While Porsche is obviously pushing for better fuel economy,especially in base models, don't be quick to think their going to change their philosophy and start turbocharging GT3's or something similarly contrary.


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 info from the source!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:35 AM.